UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Anti-Diarrhoeal Activity and Toxicity Trial of Methanolic Fruit-Pulp Extract of Aegle Marmelos (L.) Correa in Sprague-Dawle Rats

Santanu Ghorai Kalyan Sarma Parimal Roy Choudhury Gunjan Das Damodar Singh Girin Kalita Jitendra Choudhury Rahul Singh Arya
Vol 8(9), 326-337
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180215113413

The present study was designed to determine the toxicity as well as anti-diarrhoeal effect of the unripe methanolic fruit-pulp extract of Aegle marmelos in sprague drawle rat (SD rat). Qualitative Phytochemical analysis of methanolic unripe fruit-pulp extract of Aegle marmelos was done as per standard method. Extracts of methanolic unripe fruit-pulp extract of Aegle marmelos were evaluated at doses of 15mg/kg, 30mg/kg, 120mg/kg and 1600mg/kg in SD rats for anti diarrhoeal effect in castor oil induced diarrhoea. For toxicity effect, 5000 mg/kg of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos was administered orally to three female rats at first with 0.02% tween 80 vehicles and observed for any abnormal condition up to 14days. Qualitative analyses of different phytochemicals of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos showed that the presence of tannin and terpenoids were highly positive whereas alkaloid was moderately positive and flavonoid was slightly positive. The study revealed that the dose of 30mg/kg BW and 1600 mg/kg BW of methanolic extract of A. marmelos showed same treatment response with Loperamide against castor oil induced diarrhoea in rats. It can be concluded that methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos may be effective in reducing diarrhoea in animals.


Keywords : Aegle marmelos Anti-Diarrhoea Phytochemicals Rats

Therapy of diarrhoea can be done by anti-secretory drugs like as bencetimide and loperamide alone or in combination with antibacterial agents (Solis et al., 1993; Straw et al., 2006). As a supportive therapy of diarrhoea electrolyte replacement through orally to prevent fluid loss can also be given (Straw et al., 2006). Indiscriminate antibiotic treatment often associated with generation of resistant bacterium and needless to say in day one of treatment it is very difficult to establish pathogen – disease association and determine pathogens resistance pattern to its conventional chemotherapies. Antibiotics like tetracycline, chloramphenicol, aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolones produces hepato toxicity, bone marrow depression, nephrotoxicity and G. I. disorders respectively (Rang et al., 2007).

Generally people use allopathic medication to treat diseases of their animals, but there are many adverse effects related to dose, site of administration, drug interaction and anaphylactic reactions. Rang et al. (2007) described that loperamide, an anti-secretory drug has unwanted side effects like abdominal cramp, constipation, drowsiness, dizziness. In view of low residual contamination, low environmental pollution of natural raw materials, a increasing number of studies are focusing on phylogenic products that comprise a wide variety of herbs, spices, and essential oils (Windisch et al.,  2008). Alternative herbal therapy is one of the alternatives as there is less chance of toxicity, easy availability and also economical. Indian subcontinent is full of plant species having medicinal values, so people can exploit this advantage for treatment of diarrhoea.  Bael, Aegle marmelos (Linn.) is an important medicinal plant found all over India. Leaves, fruits, stem, bark and roots of Aegle marmelos have been used in ethnomedicine to exploit its medicinal properties.  Methanolic unripe fruit pulp extract of Aegle marmelos has already been explored for anti-diarrhoeal effect against castor oil induced diarrhoea in mice (Sarin and Bafina, 2012; Shoba and Thomas, 2001). Patel and Asdaq (2010) reported that methanolic extract of fruit pulp of Aegle marmelos was acutely non-toxic up to 0.02000 mg/ kg in Wister albino rats.  In this study the toxicity as well as anti-diarrhoeal effect of the unripe methanolic fruit-pulp extract was investigated in SD rats to further substantiate its clinical use.

Materials and Methods

Plant Identification and Preparation of Extract

Collected fruits and plant parts of Aegle marmelos were washed and then dried under shed and herbarium was prepared according to the standard herbarium making procedure and sent to Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, India for identification. The fruit pulp was harvested manually by hand and seed was separated in the same way. Then fruit pulp was sliced into very small pieces and dried in the hot plate using 370C for 38-42 hrs. Then the dried up fruit pulp was mechanically grinded. The resulted powder was extracted by soxhlate extractor at 420C using methanol as a solvent until there was colourless dropping of methanol from siphon of the extractor followed by 2 step condensation of the obtained extracts were done. First condensation occurs in soxhlate extractor during solvent recovery phase followed by second condensation occurs in vacuum evaporator at 400C until there was a brown residue sticking the bottom of the jar. Now this sticky extract was kept in a dark room for 36 hrs for further solidification. Before vacuum evaporation the solvent separated extract was filtered through Whattman filter paper No.1. Then the dried extracts were dissolved in 0.02% aqueous tween 80 by vigorous vortexing for 90-130.02 min (Hood et al., 2003). The maximum concentration achieved @ 760 mg/ml was used as stock solution for experiment.

Phytochemical Estimation of the Extract

Qualitative phytochemical analysis was done according to the method described by Edoga et al. (2005) and Kasolo et al.  (2010).

Test for Tannin

0.0.02 gm of sample was boiled with 20 ml double distilled water in a water bath and filtered. To the filtrate few drops of 0.1% ferric chloride solution was added. The solution was observed for brownish green or blue black colouration, which was indicative of tannin.

Test for Flavonoid

Approximately 2 gms of plant powder was heated with 10 ml ethyl acetate in a steam bath for 3 minutes and filtered. 4 ml of the filtrate was shaken with 1 ml dilute ammonia solution. Presence of yellow coloration was indicative of flavonoid.

Test for Terpenoids

0.02 ml of extract, 2 ml of chloroform and 3 ml of sulphuric acid were added carefully to form layers. Reddish brown coloration of inter-phase of 2 layers indicated presence of terpenoids.

Test for Anthraquinones

0.0.02 gm of extract was boiled with 10 ml sulphuric acid and filtered hot. The filtrate was shaken with 0.02 ml chloroform. The chloroform layer was pipetted into another test tube and 1 ml of dilute ammonia was added. The resulting solution was observer for colour changes.

Mayer’s Test for Alkaloids

To solvent evaporated extract dilute Hcl was added and filtered. To 2-3 ml of this filtrate add few drops of Dragendroff ‘s reagent yellowish white precipitate indicate presence of alkaloids.

Procurement and Housing of SD Rats

The adult healthy SD rats were procured for this study. The permission of Institutional Animal Ethics Committee was taken (CVSC/CAU/IAEC /13-14/R28) for this study. 39 adult Sprague Dawle rats (100-200 gm) were kept in experimental animal shed of College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, CAU, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram with standard feeding and management. Before trial all the rats were reared for 10 days for acclimatization. Feed and water were sterilized by autoclaving and additional vitamins were supplemented.

Anti-Diarrhoeal Activity Test

Castor oil induced diarrhea in rat model was used as per the method described by Shoba and Thomas (2001). Rats were divided into six groups having six rats in each group and treated with as follows –

S. No. Group (n=6) Treatment
1 Gr A Castor oil @ 1ml/rat +0.02% tween 80 vehicle @1ml/rat orally
2 Gr. B Castor oil @ 1ml/rat +loperamide @3mg/kg orally
3 Gr. C Castor oil @ 1ml/rat +Extract of A. marmelos @15 mg/kg orally
4 Gr. D Castor oil @ 1ml/rat + Extract of A. marmelos @30 mg/kg orally
5 Gr. E Castor oil @ 1ml/rat + Extract of A. marmelos @120 mg/kg orally
6 Gr. F Castor oil @ 1ml/rat + Extract of A. marmelos @1600 mg/kg orally

Rats were placed in cages and the floor of each cage was lined with blotting paper along with 18 hr feed restriction. The treatment was applied on 17th hr of fasting and castor oil was applied on 18th hr. The floor lining was changed every hour and 1hour after the above treatment, the total numbers of feces excreted by the animals and fecal consistency in all the groups were recorded in every one hour interval up to 4hours. A numeric score based on the faecal consistency was assigned as follows: dry (1), semi dry (2) and wet (3). The number of diarrheal feces and percentage of Inhibition of diarrheal feces was calculated (Mani et al., 2011). Percentage inhibition was calculated as follows-

PI= Mean defecation (control-treated group) x100/ Mean defecation of negative control group.

The lowest and highest herbal dosage which was act most like similar to loperamide treatment were regarded as anti-secretory anti-diarrheal dose rate of herbal extract.

Acute Toxicity Trial

5000 mg/kg of methanolic extract was administered orally to three female rats at first with 0.02% tween 80 vehicles. Then the general signs and symptoms of toxicity, intake of food and water and mortality were recorded for a period of 14 days. The weight of each animal was taken before extract administration and then weekly once and prior to euthanasia .Then all 3 of them were euthanatized and post mortem findings were recorded. The trial was conducted following Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED) 423, 2002 guideline.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysis as per standard procedure (Snecdecor and Cochran, 1989).

Result and Discussion

 

 

Phytochemicals

Qualitative analyses of different phytochemicals of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos depicted in Table 1.  Interpretation was done by negative (-), positive (+), moderately positive (++) and highly positive (+++) indicator. The analysed showed that the presence of tannin and terpenoids in methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos were highly positive whereas alkaloid was moderately positive (++) and flavanoid was slightly positive. On the other hand anthraquinone was not detected.

Table 1: Qualitative analysis of phytochemicals of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos

Phytochemical Qualitative values
Tannin +++
Flavonoid +
Terpenoids +++
Anthraquinone
Alkaloid ++

Anti-Diarrhoeal Effect of Methanolic Extract of Aegle marmelos

Number of Wet Faeces

The number of wet faeces of different groups is shown in Table 2. The no. of wet faeces in all the groups was counted every one hour interval for 4hours after castor oil induced diarrhoea. There was no any wet faeces was observed in all the treatment groups except Gr. C where 7 no. of wet faeces were observed in 1st hour only (Table 2).

Table 2: Antidiarrhoeal properties of different doses of methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos in terms of number of wet faeces

S. No. Group(n=6) No of Wet Faeces
Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4
1 Gr. A 32 23 18 15
2 Gr. B 0 0 0 0
3 Gr. C 7 0 0 0
4 Gr. D 0 0 0 0
5 Gr. E 0 0 0 0
6 Gr. F 0 0 0 0

Faecal Consistency

The faecal consistency of different groups is shown Fig. 1. The faecal consistency in all the groups was counted every one hour interval for 4 hours after castor oil induced diarrhoea. It was interpreted as dry (1), semi dry (2) and wet (3). There was no any wet faeces was observed in all the treatment groups except Gr. C whereas semi dry faeces was observed in 1st hour only in comparison to other groups. In Group A, rats showed wet faeces during the whole study period (Fig. 1).

.

Percentage of Inhibition of Diarrhoea

The percentage of inhibition of diarrhoea in different hours of different groups was recorded and calculated for every hour. All herbal groups except Gr. C and standard had given 100 % inhibition in all hours. In case of Gr. C the inhibition was 78.13% on 1st hour. Critical analysis revealed that the dose of 30mg/kg BW and 1600 mg/kg BW of methanolic extract of A. marmelos showed same treatment response with Loperamide, standard therapy against castor oil induced diarrhoea in rats.

Toxicity Trial of Methanolic Extract of A. marmelos

 

 

Clinical Signs and Body Weight of Experimental Rats in Toxicity Trial

Rats under study did not manifest any clinical signs and no mortality was recorded during 15 days of observation. The weights of animals prior to trial were 100 gm each. After 1 week the weights were 112.5 gm, 111.8gm and 111.5 gm and before euthanasia the weight were 125gm, 124.8gm and 124.5 gm.

Haemato-Biochemical Profile of Experimental Rats in Toxicity Trial

Mean ±SE of haemato-biochemical profile of rats during safety study shown in Table 3. Haemato-biochemical profile in all the rats were in normal range. Critical analysis of safety study did not show any side effects of high dose of A. marmelos therapy during rat model study.

Table 3: Haemato-biochemical parameters of rats receiving higher doses of A. marmelos during safety trail

S. No. Parameters Values (n=3)
1 Hb(g/dl) 13.97±0.18
2 PCV (%) 46.33±1.26
3 TEC(M/mm3) 8.43±0.34
4 TLC(m/mm3) 6.14±1.22
5 Platelet (m/mm3) 758.67±37.02
6 MCV(fl) 55.1±1.16
7 MCH(pg) 17.63±0.09
8 MCHC(g/dl) 34.73±0.58
9 Granulocyte (%) 9.53±1.57
10 Lymphocyte (%) 87.47±1.55
11 Monocyte (%) 3.00±0.25
12 BUN(mg/dl) 12.07±0.79
13 Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.53±0.09
14 ALT(U/L) 44.67±1.45
15 AST(U/L) 79.67±10.69

Gross Pathology of Rats in Necropsy of Experimental Rats in Toxicity Trial

On gross examination (Fig. 3), liver lobes revealed normal appearance in all the rats. There was no any gross change in spleen and kidney. The weight of the liver, spleen and kidney were 4.40±0.01gm, 0.48±0.01gm and 0.37±0.01gm respectively.

Discussion

The unripe fruit methanol extract showed the presence of  tannin, terpenoids, alkaloid and flavonoid which was corroborating with the findings of Rao et al. (2011) and Patel and Asdaq (2010). The phytochemical screening and quantitative estimation of the percentage of crude yields the most promising secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, proteins, tannin and carbohydrates. They are known to show medicinal activity as well as physiological activity (Hood et al., 2003). Tannin has been found to react with proline-rich protein to form irreversible complexes resulting in the inhibition of the cell protein synthesis. Fruits that have tannins as their major components are astringent in nature. They are used in treating intestinal disorders such as diarrhea and dysentery (Chrinius et al., 2011; Nisha et al., 2011). Tannins and flavonoids in general have been reported to have antidiarrhoeal activity through inhibition of intestinal motility and antisecretory effects (Brijesh et al., 2009). Steroids and terpenoids are reported to have antibacterial properties; terpenoids are known to weaken the membranous tissues, which results in dissolving cell wall of microorganisms. Alkaloids have shown to be analgesic, antispasmodic and antibacterial properties (Rao et al., 2003; Okwu and Okwu, 2004).

Traditionally, people use plant(s) or plant-derived preparations considering them to be efficacious against diarrheal disorders without any scientific basis (Atta and Mounier, 2005). These experimental models were therefore employed to validate antidiarrheal efficacy of methanolic extract of A. marmelos unripe fruit in the current study. Diarrhoea can be described as the abnormally frequent defecation of faeces of low consistency which may be due to a disturbance in the transport of water and electrolytes in the intestines. Instead of the multiplicity of etiologies, (i) increased electrolytes secretion (secretory diarrhea), (ii) increased luminal osmolarity (osmotic diarrhea), (iii) deranged intestinal motility causing a decreased transit time, and (iv) decreased electrolytes absorption may be responsible for pathophysiology (Umer et al., 2013).  Recent study claims that nitric oxide in castor oil is responsible for the diarrheal effect; although it is evidenced that ricinoleic acid produces diarrhoea through a hypersecretory response which is the most active component of castor oil (Vieria et al., 2000).  There are several mechanisms proposed to explain the diarrheal effect of castor oil including inhibition of intestinal Na+ K+ ATPase activity, consequently reducing normal fluid absorption (Imam et al., 2012), activation of adenylate cyclase or mucosal cAMP-mediated active secretion (Pinto et al., 1992), and stimulation of prostaglandin formation and platelet activating factor (Mascolo et al., 1994). Usually castor oil is metabolized into ricinoleic acid in the gut, which causes irritation and inflammation in the intestinal mucosa, resulting in the release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., prostaglandins and histamine). The released prostaglandins initiate vasodilatation, smooth muscle contraction, and mucus secretion in the small intestines. In our study, the overall antidiarrheal effect reveals the dose dependent activity. Methanolic extract of A.marmelos unripe fruit showed reduced amount of faeces in castor oil-induced rat at the doses of 30mg and 1600 mg/kg, respectively, and % inhibition of diarrhoea was 100 in both the groups. These results suggest that methanolic extract of A.marmelos unripe fruit contain antidiarrheal components. Also, from these results, it can be predicted that reduction of water and electrolytes secretion into the small intestine may enhance electrolyte absorption from the intestinal lumen consistent with inhibition of hypersecretion (Shah, 2004). Tannins and flavonoids in general have been reported to have antidiarrhoeal activity through inhibition of intestinal motility and antisecretory effects as in (Brijesh et al., 2009). However, previous studies also have shown that flavonoids have ability to inhibit intestinal motility and water and electrolytes secretion (Carlo et al., 1993). Moreover, in vivo and in vitro tests have also shown that flavonoids are able to inhibit prostaglandin E2 induced intestinal secretion and spasmogens induced contraction and also inhibit release of prostaglandins and autocoids (Dosso et al .,2011). So, the antidiarrheal activity of the methanolic extract of unripe fruit of A. marmelos could therefore be due to the presence of tannins and flavonoids.   A. marmelos has been used for centuries in India not only for its dietary purposes but also for its various medicinal properties (Chopra, 1982). Hence, it is generally considered safe and few studies have been carried out with respect to its toxicity. Acute toxicity studies have reported that a hydroalcoholic extract of A. marmelos fruit is non-toxic up to a dose of 6 g/kg body weight in mice (Jagetia et al., 2004). Pharmacological studies on animal models involving repeated doses of A. marmelos fruit extract over a period of up to 30 days have not reported any adverse effect up to a maximum dose of 250 mg/kg body weight (Jagetia et al., 2004).There were no remarkable changes noticed in body weight, behaviour, appetite in this studies after 5000 mg/kg body wt. of the extracts of A. marmelos when administered orally for 14 days successively. Pathologically, nor gross abnormalities was observed, but in histopathological observation, mild changes were observed. Collectively these data demonstrate that the extracts of the unripe fruit of A. marmelos have a high margin of drug safety (Veerappan et al., 2007).

Conclusion

In our study, methanolic extract of A. marmelos unripe fruit showed reduced amount of faeces in castor oil-induced rat at the doses of 30mg and 1600 mg/kg, respectively, and % inhibition of diarrhoea was 100 in both the groups. These results suggest that methanolic extract of A. marmelos unripe fruit contain antidiarrheal components such as tannins and flavonoids which have antidiarrhoeal activity through inhibition of intestinal motility and antisecretory effects. Acute toxicity studies have reported that methanolic extract of A. marmelos fruit is non-toxic up to a dose of 5 g/kg body weight in rat.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in carrying out this study.

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks are extended to Dean, Collage of Veterinary Sciences and Animal husbandry, CAU, Selesih, Aizawl for funding assistance. Authors are also grateful to farm employees at LPM section, for their diligent support.

References

  1. Atta, A. H. and Mounier M. 2005. Evaluation of some medicinal plant extracts for antidiarrhoeal activity. Phytother Res. 19(6): 481-485.
  2. Brijesh S, Daswani P, Tetali P, Antia N. and Birdi T. 2009. Studies on the anti-diarrhoeal activity of Aegle marmelos unripe fruit: Validating its traditional usage. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 9: 47.
  3. Carlo D, Aoutre G, Izzo AA, Maibline P, Mascolo N, Voila P, Durino M. V. and Capasso P. 1993. Inhibition of intestinal motility and secretion by flavonoids in mice and rats: structure activity relationships. J Pharm Pharmacol. 45(12):1054-1059.
  4. Chopra R. 1982. Indigenous drugs of India. Academic publishers, Kolkata, pp-245-256.
  5. Chrinius H, Gray GY, Gideon AS, Asbe MM. and Abel SA. 2011. Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of methanol and aqueous extract of Agave sisalana. Acta Poloniae Pharmacutica-Drug Research. 68(4): 535-539.
  6. Dosso BB, Nguessan AP. and Bidie D. 2011. Antidiarrheal activity of an ethanol extract of stem bark of Piliostigma reticulum (Caesalpiniceae) in rats. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 9: 242-249.
  7. Edeoga HO, Okwu DE. and Mabaebie BO. 2005. Phytochemical constituents of some Nigerian plants. African Journal of Biotechnology. 4(7): 685-688.
  8. Hood JR, Wilkinson JM. and Cavanagh HMA. 2003. Evaluation of common antibacterial screening methods utilized in essential oil research. Journal of Essential Oil Research. doi:org/ 10.1080/10412905.2003.9698631.
  9. Imam MZ, Sultana S. and Akter S. 2012. Antinociceptive, antidiarrhoeal and neuropharmacological activities of Barringtonia acuangula. Pharmaceutical Biology. doi: org/10.3109/13880209.2012.656850
  10. Jagetia GC, Venkatesh P. and Baliga MS. 2004. Evaluation of radio protective effect of bael leaf (Aegle marmelos) extract in mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 80:
  11. Kasolo JN, Bimenya GS, Ojok L, Ochieng J. and Okeng JWO. 2010. Phytochemicals and uses of Moringa oleifera leaves in Ugandan rural communities. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research. doi:10.5897/JMPR10.492
  12. Mani M, Sachan N, Chandra P, Mahur KK. and Wahi AK. 2011. Anti diarrhoeal potential of methanolic extract of root bark of Ailanthus excelsa. J Pharmacy Res. 4:422-423.
  13. Mascolo N, Izzo AA, Autore G, Barbato F. and Capasso F. 1994. Nitric oxide and castor oil induced diarrhoea. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 268(1): 291-295.
  14. Nisha Y, Gunjan T, Deepak KJ. and Ranjana M. 2011. Rapid determinationof polyphenol, vitamins, organic acids and sugars in Aegle marmelos using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 4(3):717-719.
  15. Okwu DE. and Okwu ME. 2004. Chemical composition of Spondias mombin linn. Plant part. J Sustain Agric.Environ. 6 (2): 140-147.
  16. Patel P. and Asdaq SMB. 2010. Immunomodulatory activity of methanolic fruit extract of Aegle marmelos in experimental animals. Saudi pharmaceutical journal. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2010.05.006.
  17. Pinto A, Calignano A, Mascolo N, Autore G. and Capasso F. 1992. Castor oil increases formation of platelet activating factor and acid phosphatase release in rat. British J Pharmacol. 96(4): 872-874.
  18. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. and Flower RJ. 2007. Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology, 6th edition. Churchil livingstone, Edinburgh, pp-661-678.
  19. Rao CV, Ojha A SK, Mehotra S. and Puspangadan P. 2003. Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antiulcerogenic activity of unripe fruits of Aegle marmelos. Acta Pharmacutica Turica. 45: 85-91.
  20. Rao KVB, Sekar DK, Kumar G, and Karthik L. 2011. A review on pharmacological and phytochemical properties of Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr. Serr. (Rutaceae). Asian J Plant Sci Res, 1(2): 8-17.
  21. Sarin RV. and Bafina PA. 2012. Herbal anti-diarrhoeals: a review. International journal of research in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences. 3(2): 637-649.
  22. Shah S. 2004. Evaluation of diarrhoea: the challenges continues. Part- 1. Indian J Med Sci. 58: 75-78.
  23. Shoba FG. and Thomas M. 2001. Study of anti-diarrhoeal activity of four medicinal plants in castor oil induced diarrhoea. J Ethnopharmacol, 76, 73-78.
  24. Snecdecor GW. and Cochran WG. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames.
  25. Solis PN, Wright CW, Anderson MM, Gupta MP. and Phillipson JD. 1993. A microwell cytotoxicity assay using Artemia salina (brine shrimp). Planta Medica. 59: 250-252.
  26. Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, Allaire SD. and Taylor DJ. 2006. Diseases of swine, 9th edition. Blackwell, Iowa, pp 639-690.
  27. Umer S, Tekewe A. and Kebede N. 2013. Antidiarrhoeal and anti-microbial activity of Calpurnia aurea leaf extract. BMC Complementary and Alternative doi:10.1186/1472-6882-13-21.
  28. Veerappan A, Miyazaki S, Kadarkaraisamy M. and Ranganathan D. 2007. Acute and sub-acute toxicity studies of Aegle marmelos Correa. Ind Med Plant Phytomed. 14: 209-215.
  29. Vieria C, Evangelista C, Crillo R, Lippi A, Maggi CA. and Manzini S. 2000. Effect of recinolic acid in acute and subchronic experimental models of inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 9: 223-228.
  30. Windisch WM, Schedle, K., Plitzner C. and Kroismayr A. 2008. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J Anim Sci. 86: 140–148.
Full Text Read : 2264 Downloads : 457
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close