NAAS Score 2020

                   5.36

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Poultry in India

Rahul Yadav and Sunil Maherchandani
Vol 10(3),141-151
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20200116051419

The present study was conducted for detection of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates of poultry origin in India. Highest (100%) antibiotic sensitivity was observed for chloramphenicol and aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin) whereas high antibiotic resistance was observed against β-lactam antibiotics and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, nalidixic acid and norfloxacin) in in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing and MIC determination as well. The gyrB gene which codes for proteins responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance was detected in 100% of the isolates followed by gyrA gene (95.34%). The gyrA gene-based phylogeny represented close homology of our C. jejuni isolates with isolates from Europe and didn’t represent homology with isolates from India in public domain.


Keywords : Antibiotic Resistance Campylobacter jejuni Poultry

Campylobacter jejuni is considered as most emerging food borne zoonotic pathogen and had received serious attention due to high floroquinolones and macrolide resistance in many parts of the world (Epps et al., 2013). Poultry are the major reservoir of this bacterium and responsible for transmission of infection through poultry products. Supplementation of antibiotics in poultry feed have evolved bacterial strains to be multidrug resistant (Mani et al., 2018). Campylobacter species are intrinsically resistant to a number of antibiotics, including cefoperazone, cephalothin, bacitracin, vancomycin, rifampin and trimethoprim (Acheson and Allos, 2001), some of these are utilized in selective media for isolation. Resistance may be chromosomal or plasmid-borne, and represent a combination of endogenous and acquired genes viz. modification of the antibiotic’s target and/or its expression (DNA gyrase mutations), inability of the antibiotic to reach its target (expression of the major outer membrane protein or MOMP), efflux of the antibiotic (multidrug efflux pumps such as cmeABC), modification or inactivation of the antibiotic (β-lactamase production) (Iovine, 2013).

In last few decades, intensive rearing of poultry along with indiscriminate use of antibiotics such as fluoroquinolone as feed additives, growth enhancer and therapeutics has resulted in emergence of multiple antibiotic resistant Campylobacter strains in habitat (Wieczorekand Osek, 2013). The resistant bacteria can be transmitted through contaminated poultry meat and eggs into humans (El-baky et al., 2014). World health organization has given advisory for limiting the use of floroquinolones in poultry sector as therapeutic and feed supplement in most of the western countries a decade ago. US Food and Drug Administration also have withdrawn use of fluoroquinolone from poultry since 2005 (Nelson et al., 2007). Monitoring drug resistance pattern among the Campylobacter isolates not only gives vital clues to the clinician regarding the judicious therapeutic regime to be adopted against individual cases, but also an important tool to devise a comprehensive chemoprophylactic and chemotherapeutic drug schedule within a geographical area among human and animal origin isolates (Siddiqui et al., 2015).

Antibiotic resistance patterns may vary on source of infection and geographical area. There is only few reports published from Indian origin isolates regarding antibiotic resistance of C. jejuni isolates in public domain (Chatur et al., 2014). Therefore, present study was carried out for detection of antibiotic resistance profile of C. jejuni isolates from poultry origin in India.

Material and Methods

Determination of In vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility Test with MIC

A number of 43 C. jejuni were isolated from local poultry farms in and around Bikaner, Rajasthan, India (Yadav et al., 2016). Antibiotic sensitivity testing was done against 24 antibiotics belonging to different class, generation and mechanism of action as per the method described by Bauer et al. (1966) following the guidelines of Clinical laboratory standard institute (Wayne, 2010; 2011) and European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility (Kahlmeter, 2006). Due to poor visibility of zone of inhibition on M-H plates; for the present study 0.5 McFarland concentrations of Campylobacter enrichment broth culture (Preston enrichment broth base, Himedia) supplemented with Campylobacter supplement IV (Himedia) and 7% lysed horse blood was then swabbed on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) plate including Campylobacter supplement V (Himedia) with the help of sterile cotton swab. On this medium the visibility of zones of inhibition was clearer. Variations in standard disk diffusion method have been approved by Wayne (2010) for Campylobacter isolates (Beek et al., 2010). MIC determination was done by Ezy MIC™ strips of six antibiotics (amikacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) with similar procedure as described above. Zone of inhibition for an antibiotic were interpreted as per the standards of Enterobacteriaceae (Shin et al., 2015) defined by clinical laboratory standards institute (Wayne, 2011). All Multidrug resistant isolates were evaluated for their multiple antibiotics resistance (MAR) index (Krumperman, 1983).

Amplification of Virulence Associated Genes

Molecular detection of various antibiotic resistance genes i.e. tetracycline, aminoglycosides, multidrug resistance efflux and integrons were done using earlier reported primer sets and/or primer set designed for the present study (Table 1). The primers were designed by primer 3 tool of NCBI for cmeRABC (multidrug efflux pump) and aph3 (aminoglycosides resistance) gene in this study. All PCR amplifications were performed in a mixture (25 μl) containing: 2.5μl of the 10X PCR buffer, 2.5μl of MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.5 μl of dNTPs (10 mM), 1 μl of each primer (100 μM), 0.5 μl (1U) of the Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), 3 μl of the bacterial template DNA and 14 μl nuclease free water. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel for 1 h at 100V. The gel was then visualized under UVP gel documentation system (BioDoc-It Imaging System).

Sequence Analysis of gyrA Gene

PCR products of partial gyrA gene partial cds from nine representative of C. jejuni isolates were sequenced (DNA Sequencing Facility, Delhi University). The sequences obtained were subjected to NCBI nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search tool (BLAST) to determine the similarity with the already prevalent gene sequences. The nucleotide sequences (accession number KY084915 to KY084923) were submitted to NCBI genebank. The sequences were also aligned using Bio edit and MEGA6 software to study the variations in the nucleotide sequences and their phylogenetic cluster analysis (Bikandi et al., 2004).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1: PCR primers and conditions for detection of antibiotic resistance genes

S. no Antibiotic resistance gene Gene name Primer sequence A. temp (°C) Size (bp) Reference
Antibiotic Resistance genes
1 Tetracycline resistance  genes tetO F-AACTTAGGCATTCTGGCTCAC 56 515 Abdi-Hachesooet al. (2014)
R-TCCCACTGTTCCATATCGTCA
2 tetA F-GTAATTCTGAGCACTGTCGC 57 956 Wilkerson et al. (2004)
R-CTGCCTGGACAACATTGCTT
3 tetB F-CTCAGTATTCCAAGCCTTTG 52 414
R-ACTCCCCTGAGCTTGAGGGG
4 tetC F-GGTTGAAGGCTCTCAAGGGC 62 505
R-CCTCTTGCGGGATATCGTCC
5 tetD F-CATCCATCCGGAAGTGATAGC 57 485
R-GGATATCTCACCGCATCTGC
6 tetE F-TGATGATGGCACTGGTCA 57 262
R-GCTGGCTGTTGCCATTA
7 tetG F-GCAGCGAAAGCGTATTTGCG 62 662
R-TCCGAAAGCTGTCCAAGCAT
8 Aminoglycoside resistance genes aph3 F-TTCTAGCCACGACCAAAAAG 56 363 Current study
R-CGTGAGCCATAAAGTCTAGC
9 strA F-CCAATCGCAGATAGAAGGC 55 286 Scholz et al. (1989)
R-CTTGGTGATAACGGCAATTC
10 aadA2 F-ATTTGCTGGTTACGGTGACC 59 451
R-CTTCAAGTATGACGGGCTGA
11 Fluoroquinolone resistance genes gyrA F -GAAGAATTTTATATGCTATG 50 235 Chatur et al. (2014)
R-TCAGTATAACGCATCGCAGC
12 gyrB F-ATGGCAGCTAGAGGAAGAGA 53 382
R-GTGATCCATCAACATCCGCA
13 parC F-CTATGCGATGTCAGAGCTGG 59 285
R-TAACAGCAGCTCGGCGTATT
Multidrug resistance determinants genes
14 Efflux pump (cmeABC operon) genes cmeRABC, Strain F-CAATCTTCAATCAGGGGCAA 56 625 Current study
R-TCGCAAAAAGAGTGCACATA
15 Integron genes int1F F-CCTCCCGCACGATGATC 55 280 Moura et al. (2007)
int1R` R-TCCACGCATCGTCAGGC
16 int2F F-TTATTGCTGGGATTAGGC 50 233
int2R R-ACGGCTACCCTCTGTTATC
17 int3F F-AGTGGGTGGCGAATGAGTG 50 600
int3R R-TGTTCTTGTATCGGCAGGTG

 

Results and Discussion

Determination of In vitro Antibiotic Susceptibility Test with MIC

All the 43 isolates were subjected to antibiotic sensitivity testing against 24 antibiotics of different classes and generation. Highest (100%) sensitivity was observed for polymxin-B followed by chloramphenicol (97.67%), gentamicin (95.35%), amikacin (88.37%), aztreonam (83.72%), meropenem and imepenem (76.74%), kanamycin (72.09%), ceftriaxone (65.12%), erythromycin and ampicillin (53.49%). Isolates were 100% resistant to Penicillin-G, methicillin and rifampcin. Relatively lower level of resistance was detected against cephalothin (95.35%), vancomycin (93.02%), ciprofloxacin (90.70%), ofloxacin (79.07%), nalidixic acid (74.42%) and norfloxacin (72.09%). High resistance was observed against β-lactam antibiotics. Similarly, a very high resistance (100%) against fluoroquinolone group of antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, nalidixic acid and norfloxacin) was also seen.

In the present investigation, all 43 isolates were subjected to MIC determination for six antibiotics i.e. erythromycin (2 to 12 mcg/ml), gentamicin (0.38 to 6 mcg/ml), chloramphenicol (3 to 16 mcg/ml), amikacin (0.5 to 32 mcg/ml) by Ezy MIC™ Strip method. Erythromycin has highest average MIC value of 5.74 mcg/ml followed by chloramphenicol (4.80 mcg/ml), amikacin (0.86 mcg/ml) and gentamicin (0.23 mcg/ml). None of the isolate formed any zone of inhibition for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, considered them to be 100% resistant. On the basis of their average MIC value, isolates were detected as sensitive for amikacin and gentamicin, intermediate for erythromycin and chloramphenicol and resistant for ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.

Resistance against multiple antibiotics was observed by multiple antibiotic resistances (MAR) index which is an epidemiological tool used to assess the risk analysis of environment for bacterial contamination and acquisition of drug resistance through use of multiple antibiotics. If MAR index is greater than 0.2; it implies that strains of such bacteria originated from an environment where several antibiotics have been used (Krumperman, 1983). The average MAR index of the 43 isolates under study was 0.45 demonstrates high prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistant C. jejuni isolates from India (Table 2).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Detection of multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index value among isolates

MAR Index Value Type (MAR) Isolate I.D. No. of Isolate No. of antibiotic, which the isolate was resistant Total no of antibiotics MAR Index Value Significance
MAR1 C1,C18,C29,C30 4 7 24 0.29 43 (100%) isolates had 0.2 or more than 0.2 MAR index value with high risk potential source of spread MDR
MAR 2 C25,C28 2 8 24 0.33
MAR 3 C7,C12,C14,C16,C22,C23,C26,C31,C42 9 9 24 0.38
MAR 4 C24,C27,C36,C39,C40,C41 6 10 24 0.42
MAR 5 C4,C5,C21,C37,C43 5 11 24 0.46
MAR 6 C2,C3,C8,C13,C17,C20,C32,C34 8 12 24 0.5
MAR 7 C6,C9,C11,C19,C38 5 13 24 0.54
MAR 8 C35 1 14 24 0.58
MAR 9 C10,C15,C33 3 15 24 0.63
TOTAL 43   19.17  
  Average MAR Value 0.45  

In agreement to our observation, Ghimire et al. (2014) detected 77.8% of the isolates with MAR index value >0.2. Multiple mechanisms associated with antibiotic resistance have been identified in Campylobacter, but target mutations and drug efflux are most relevant to the resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides (Luangtongkum et al., 2009).

Amplification of Virulence Associated Genes

PCR assay successfully amplify only seven genes (tetO, aph3, gyrA, gyrB, cmeRABC, int1 and int2) out of 17 genes (Fig. 1). The gyrB gene which codes for proteins responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance was detected in 100% of the isolates followed by gyrA gene (95.34%), tetO and aph3 genes (74.41%) and cmeRABC (72.09%) isolates. Out of three integron genes only int1 (30.23%) and int2 (6.97%) were amplified.

Fig. 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis image of various antibiotic resistance genes of C. jejuni

Campylobacter multidrug efflux pump (cmeABC) genes are major player in theefflux of bile acids and plays a critical role in facilitating Campylobacter colonization of the intestinal tract (Lin et al., 2003; Elhadidy et al., 2018). The isolates from present study harbored the cmeABC genes responsible for multidrug resistance. Integrons are not common in Campylobacter and do not considered to play a major role in the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter. However, studies by Lee et al. (2002); O’Halloran et al. (2004) suggested the integrons-associated antibiotic resistance (aminoglycoside resistance genes (aadA2 and aacA4), in C. jejuni and C. coli. Usually resistance towards tetracycline antibiotic occurs due to expression of various tet genes types i.e tetA, tetB, tetC, tetE, tetg, tetO found in plasmid as well as chromosome of various Gram positive and Gram-negative organism. However, only tetO was reported as highly prevalent in Campylobacter species (Dasti et al., 2007). We also didn’t detect any of the tetracycline genes except tetO in present study.

Sequence Analysis of gyrA Gene

In addition, we also performed gyrA gene sequence based phylogenetic analysis. In addition to nine isolates from the current study, we selected 27 sequences (from across the world) of gyrA gene from the public domain. The phylogenetic analysis revealed three major clusters (Fig. 2). Five isolates from the present study grouped along with poultry and human isolates from Europe (Austria, Slovenia, Germany, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina), New Zealand and Japan. Rest four isolates (C22, C25, C31, and C32) were grouped under separate cluster (cluster II) that has majority of isolates form USA. The previously reported gyrA gene sequences from India were grouped in separate cluster (Cluster III) and didn’t represent close homology with the isolates from this study. Taken together gyrA gene-based phylogeny represented close homology of our C. jejuni isolates with isolates from Europe.

Fig. 2: Phylogenetic analysis of gyrA gene sequences

In this study, multidrug resistance was observed in more than 70% of the isolates and absolute resistance was determined for fluoroquinolones antibiotics by in vitro susceptibility testing, MIC determination, and detection of fluoroquinolones resistance genes i.e. gyrA and gyrB. While most microorganisms possess 2 fluoroquinolone-targets (DNA-Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV), Campylobacter spp. only possesses one of the DNA-Gyrases (Luangtongkum et al., 2009). Resistance to fluoroquinolone is believed to develop more rapidly in Campylobacter spp, than in other Gram-negative bacteria, mainly attributed to single-step point mutation in Thr-86-Ile of gyrA gene (Luangtongkum et al., 2009; Otigbu et al., 2018). gyrA gene-based phylogenetic analysis of present study isolates showed close homology with isolates from Europe, rather than isolates from India. High fluoroquinoles resistance has been reported by Chatur et al. (2014) in India previously. The reason for the high prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in India is unknown, but it might be driven by the use of fluoroquinolone in animal and poultry production (Collado et al., 2018). In this increasing trend of fluoroquinolone resistance in our and previous studies indicate the need of interventions to limit spread of resistant isolates.

Conclusion

Conclusively, C. jejuni isolates from present study are detected as multidrug resistant strains. High MAR values and MDR status of all the isolates is an indication of excessive use of antibiotics and is a point of concern. The antibiotic resistance patterns indicate that C. jejuni isolates have evolved themselves for resistance to fluoroquinolone group of antibiotics. The absolute fluoroquinolone resistance may acquire by cumulative effect of gyrA gene point mutation, efflux pump regulator CmeRABC gene and integrons. Such mutant strains are more stable as compared to fluoroquinolone sensitive strains and didn’t carry fitness burden.

Acknowledgment

The study was funded by Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (RAJUVAS), Bikaner as part of Ph. D dissertation of the first author Dr. Rahul Yadav under supervision of major advisor Prof. Sunil Maherchandani.

Conflict of Interest

Authors don’t have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdi-hachesoo, B., Khoshbakht, R., Sharifiyazdi, H., Tabatabaei, M., Hosseinzadeh, S., &Asasi, K. (2014). Tetracycline resistance genes in Campylobacter jejuni and coli isolated from poultry carcasses. Journal of Microbiology, 7(9), e12129.
  2. Acheson, D., & Allos, B. M. (2001). Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clinical infectious diseases, 32(8), 1201-1206.
  3. Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., & Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology45(4), 493-496.
  4. Beek, M. T., Claas, E. C. J., Mevius, D. J., Van Pelt, W., Wagenaar, J. A., &Kuijper, E. J. (2010). Inaccuracy of routine susceptibility tests for detection of erythromycin resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Clinical Microbiology and Infection16(1), 51-56.
  5. Bikandi, J., Millán, R. S., Rementeria, A., & Garaizar, J. (2004). In silico analysis of complete bacterial genomes, PCR, AFLP–PCR and endonuclease restriction. Bioinformatics20(5), 798-799.
  6. Chatur, Y. A., Brahmbhatt, M. N., Modi, S., & Nayak, J. B. (2014). Fluoroquinolone resistance and detection of topoisomerase gene mutation in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from animal and human sources. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science3(6), 773-783.
  7. Collado, L., Muñoz, N., Porte, L., Ochoa, S., Varela, C., & Muñoz, I. (2018). Genetic diversity and clonal characteristics of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter jejuni isolated from Chilean patients with gastroenteritis. Infection, Genetics and Evolution58,290-293.
  8. Dasti, J. I., Groß, U., Pohl, S., Lugert, R., Weig, M., & Schmidt-Ott, R. (2007). Role of the plasmid-encoded tet (O) gene in tetracycline-resistant clinical isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Journal of medical microbiology, 56(6), 833-837.
  9. El-Baky, R. A., Sakhy, M., &Gad, G. F. M. (2014). Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and genotyping of campylobacter species isolated from children suffering from gastroenteritis. Indian journal of medical microbiology32(3), 240.
  10. Elhadidy, M., Miller, W. G., Arguello, H., Álvarez-Ordóñez, A., Duarte, A., Dierick, K., &Botteldoorn, N. (2018). Genetic basis and clonal population structure of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from broiler carcasses in Belgium. Frontiers in microbiology9, 1014.
  11. Epps, S., Harvey, R., Hume, M., Phillips, T., Anderson, R., &Nisbet, D. (2013). Foodborne Campylobacter, infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10(12), 6292-6304.
  12. Ertaş, H. B., Çetinkaya, B., Muz, A., &Öngör, H. (2004). Genotyping of broiler-originated Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates using fla typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA methods. International Journal of Food Microbiology94(2), 203-209.
  13. Ghimire, L., Singh, D. K., Basnet, H. B., Bhattarai, R. K., Dhakal, S., & Sharma, B. (2014). Prevalence, antibiogram and risk factors of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in dressed porcine carcass of Chitwan, Nepal. BMC microbiology, 14(1), 85.
  14. Iovine, N. M. (2013). Resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni. Virulence4(3), 230-240.
  15. Kahlmeter, G., Brown, D.F.J., Goldstein, F.W., MacGowan, A.P., Mouton, J.W., Odenholt, I., Rodloff, A., Soussy, C.J., Steinbakk, M., Soriano, F. &Stetsiouk, O. (2006). European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) technical notes on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical Microbiology and Infection12(6), 501-503.
  16. Krumperman, P. H. (1983). Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Applied Environmental Microbiology46(1), 165-170.
  17. Lee, M. D., Sanchez, S., Zimmer, M., Idris, U., Berrang, M. E., & McDermott, P. F. (2002). Class 1 integron-associated tobramycin-gentamicin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the broiler chicken house environment. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 46(11), 3660-3664.
  18. Lin, J., Sahin, O., Michel, L. O., & Zhang, Q. (2003). Critical role of multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in bile resistance and in vivo colonization of Campylobacter jejuniInfection and immunity71(8), 4250-4259.
  19. Luangtongkum, T., Jeon, B., Han, J., Plummer, P., Logue, C. M., &Zhang, Q. (2009). Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter, emergence, transmission and persistence. Future Microbiology, 4(2), 189-200.
  20. Mani, M., Pandey, R., Rautela, R.&Trivedi, R. (2018). Epidemiological Studies on Animals and Humans as Reservoirs of Thermophilic Campylobacters. International Journal of Livestock Research, 8(6), 203-211.
  21. Moura, A., Henriques, I., Ribeiro, R., &Correia, A. (2007). Prevalence and characterization of integrons from bacteria isolated from a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy60(6), 1243-1250.
  22. Nelson, J. M., Chiller, T. M., Powers, J. H., &Angulo, F. J. (2007). Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter species and the withdrawal of fluoroquinolones from use in poultry, a public health success story. Clinical Infectious Diseases44(7), 977-980.
  23. O’Halloran, F., Lucey, B., Cryan, B., Buckley, T., & Fanning, S. (2004). Molecular characterization of class 1 integrons from Irish thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 53(6), 952-957.
  24. Otigbu, A., Clarke, A., Fri, J., Akanbi, E., &Njom, H. (2018). Antibiotic sensitivity profiling and virulence potential of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from estuarine water in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15(5), 925.
  25. Scholz, P., Haring, V., Wittmann-Liebold, B., Ashman, K., Bagdasarian, M., &Scherzinger, E. (1989). Complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010. Gene75(2): 271-288.
  26. Shin, E., Hong, H., Oh, Y., &Lee, Y. (2015). First report and molecular characterization of a Campylobacter jejuni isolate with extensive drug resistance from a travel-associated human case. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy59(10), 6670-6672.
  27. Siddiqui, F. M., Akram, M., Noureen, N., Noreen, Z., & Bokhari, H. (2015). Antibiotic susceptibility profiling and virulence potential of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from different sources in Pakistan. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine8(3), 197-202.
  28. Wayne, P. A. (2010). Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria, approved guideline—. Document M45-A2.
  29. Wayne, P. A. (2011). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-first Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S21, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
  30. Wieczorek, K., & Osek, J. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms among Campylobacter. BioMed Research International, 2013.
  31. Wilkerson, C., Samadpour, M., van Kirk, N., & Roberts, M. C. (2004). Antibiotic resistance and distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in Escherichia coli O157: H7 isolates from humans and bovines. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy48(3): 1066-1067.
  32. Yadav, R., Gahlot, K., Yadav, J., Purva, M., Bhati, T., Deora, A., Kumar, P., Maherchandani, S., & Kashyap, S.K. (2016). Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter jejuni isolated from cloacal samples of poultry. Haryana Veterinary Journal. 55(2): 195-197.
Full Text Read : 624 Downloads : 153
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close