NAAS Score 2019

                   5.36

Declaration Format

Please download DeclarationForm and submit along with manuscript.

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Biofilm: An Alarming Niche in Dairy Industry

Parul Singh Gourab Basak Barkha Sharma Udit Jain Raghavendra Mishra Vaishali
Vol 9(4), 10-24
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20190207061546

Biofilm is an aggregation of microbial cells interconnected by extracellular polymeric substances which accelerate growth on different material surfaces adversely affect the dairy industry. This polymicrobial community contains altered phenotype which differs them from planktonic microbes physiologically. It affects the quality and safety of raw materials and their products. Thus, producing serious problems directly affecting human health. Colonisation at the surfaces of open and closed piping systems, floors, waste, walls, ceilings of the production halls play a major role as barrier in the selection of effective sanitation agents for their control. As a result, the sector is forced to face a havoc economical loss. In fact, the condition is aggravating day-by-day. As microbes growing in a biofilm are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents and host’s immune system, it is obligatory to employ effective methods to retard the biofilm formation. Therefore, immediate appropriate precautionary measures should be adopted to combat the condition and prevent further complications.


Keywords : Biofilm Biofilm Formation Bacillus Pseudomonas Listeria Streptococcus Lactobacillus E. coli Prevention and Control of Biofilm

The existence of biofilm has been explored for several years in the food industry. The first documentation was done roughly 75 years back in 1943 (Zobell, 1943). Biofilms are sessile microbial communities where microbes live together in association with each other on biotic or abiotic substrates which are bounded by extracellular polysaccharides, proteins, lipids and DNA (Sim˜oes et al., 2010). In other words, simply, biofilms represent an important mode of bacterial life colonizing most of the surfaces in nature. Wet solid surfaces promote biofilm production as the biotic and/or abiotic materials present in the liquid settle over the solid counterpart and attract active microbes to form biofilms (Mu et al., 2014). Wet exteriors are generally covered with extracellular matrix which further aid the attachment of microbes (Bardiau et al., 2016). This matrix enhances microbial survival and even protects them from antimicrobial agents (Chen et al., 2007). Thus, biofilms act as a crucial defensive biota where microbes possess a secure live, multiply invariably and able to yield thermal-resistant enzymes and spores (Felipe et al., 2017).

Characteristics of Biofilm

Biofilms are complex, dynamic and remarkably heterogeneous structures. Different biofilms exhibit different chemical and electrical properties. Moreover the genetic expression is also different in biofilm bacteria as compared to the planktonic bacteria (Costerton et al., 1999; Fox et al., 2005). The cells are able to coordinate among each other via intercellular communication using biochemical signalling molecules (Flemming et al., 2010). Besides, these are generally impervious to nutritional and oxidative stresses, desiccation, UV light exposure and sanitizing agents (Fatemi and Frank, 1999). Stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane are the prolific surfaces for biofilm attachment when they come in contact with food materials (Mustapha and Liewen, 1989; Midelet and Carpentier, 2002). The biofilm associated microbes are also much less susceptible to antimicrobial agents than those present in planktonic state. As a result, it becomes difficult to get rid of biofilms from the contact surfaces of food (Simões et al., 2006).

Biofilms endorse intraspecies and/or interspecies interaction and some of them may be formed by aggregation of many bacterial genuses and are known as mixed biofilms (Sim˜oes et al., 2010). A wide variety of foodborne pathogens are also able to attach, colonize and form biofilms, such as the O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC), S. enterica, L. monocytogenes, etc. (Wang, 2019).

Vulnerable Zones of Biofilms Formation            

Almost all branches of food industry are affected with it. But it is of utmost concern especially in food processing plants and considerably in dairy industry (Frank et al., 2003; Jessen and Lammert, 2003). In dairy plant, biofilms can develop on floors, walls, drains, interior and exterior of dairy equipment and machines, transporting pipes and even working surfaces are prone to biofilm formation (Krysinski et al., 1992; Hood and Zottola, 1997; Gibson et al., 1999; Sinde and Carballo, 2000; Verran, 2002). These can be seen in almost all product contact surfaces like milk cups at dairy farms to heat exchangers at the processing plants. This poses a great risk to safety, security and quality of dairy products and to the health of consumers who get exposed to such products (Flint et al., 1997; Scheldeman et al., 2005; Burgess et al., 2010., Bayoumi et al., 2012).

 

Process of Biofilm Formation

The formation process of biofilms by various microbes undergoes a number of phases till its maturation (Stoodley et al., 2002; Breyers and Ratner, 2004; Johnston, 2004). Thus, for accomplishment of the scenario it gradually passes through different steps, viz. 1. Attachment process (reversible and irreversible) 2. Biofilm polymer/microcolony formation 3. Maturation and replication and 4. Cell dispersion or detachment. Under these major steps, the following sequential steps are also involved in biofilm formation. These include- a) substratum pre-conditioning by ambient macromolecule; b) cell deposition; c) cell adsorption; d) desorption; e) cell-to-cell signalling and onset of exopolymer production; f) convective and diffusive transport of O2 and nutrients; g) replication and growth; h) secretion of polysaccharide matrix, and i) detachment, erosion and sloughing (Simoes et al., 2010).

The process begins with the adhesion of cells to the substratum and this adhesion to the adjoining surfaces is a crucial factor for the entire process (Vieira et al., 1993; Busscher et al., 1995; Donlan., 2002; Chae et al., 2006; Palmer et al., 2007; Patel et al., 2007; Oulahal et al., 2008;). The cell organelles like outer membrane proteins, capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharides, curli, pilli, fimbrillae, prosthecae, stalks and flagella create impact on cell charge and hydrophobicity as well as guide the adhesion during biofilm formation (Morris et al., 1997; Harbron and Kent, 1988; Sauer and Camper, 2001; Daniels et al., 2004; De Rezende et al., 2005). Hence, this preliminary conjunction is reversible as the bacterial interaction is weak and the attachment entails numerous morphological changes which are essential for biofilm formation as a result, there lies a possibility of detachment of many cells (Terraf et al., 2012). Thereafter the attachment turns to irreversible one and the bonding is permanent due to exopolysaccharides (EPS) secretion and subsequently the microcolonies form and expand on the surface (Stoodley et al., 2002). These microcolonies form by the cell-aggregation which in turn occurs through growth of microbes, enabling EPS production (Chmielewski and Frank, 2006). Microbial cells remain entrenched within the EPS matrix in multiple layers (cohesion) which provide nutrition for them. A bacterial EPS encompasses polysaccharide, proteins, lipids, nucleic acid, phosphor lipids and humic substances and may also carry the water channels (Jahn and Nielsen et al., 1998). Thus, EPS proves to be a boon for microbes as it provides more resistance within a biofilm (Davies et al., 1998; Sauer and Camper, 2001; Parsek and Greenberg, 2005). Besides, the microcolony aids substrate exchange within species and removes their end-products (Costerton et al., 1994). Progressively maturation and ordered construction occurs in a time period and ultimately detachment of cells occurs and the colonization at new areas crop up (Sauer et al., 2002; Stoodley et al., 2002).

 

 

 

Adherence
Colonisation & Maturation
Release

 

 

 

Fig.1: Flow diagram showing the major steps of biofilm formation

Factors Affecting Biofilm Formation

Although the process of biofilm formation does not go so smooth every time. Sometimes it may influence by multiple factors like bacterial strains, pH, nutrient concentration or level, surface texture, surface hydrophobicity, temperature, speed of liquid stream, osmotic pressure etc which affect the biofilm creation (Donlan and Costerton, 2002; Donlan, 2002; Nilsson et al., 2011). The degree of biofilm formation also varies highly with the inter-strain variation, increase in temperature, flow velocity or nutrient concentration. Though these factors may impart negative effect on the formation process if their critical levels are being exceeded (Stoodley et al., 1999; Pan et al., 2009). A pictorial presentation of factors which affect to biofilm formation is given below:

Temperature
Bacterial strain

 

 

 

 

Texture
pH

 

Biofilm

Osmotic pressure
Stream speed

Formation

 

 

Hydrophobicity
Nutrient concentration

 

 

 

Fig. 2: Factors affecting biofilm formation

Biofilm Forming Microbes of Dairy Industry

Microorganisms occurring in the food industry could be a source of secondary contamination in food products. Their attachment to food contact surfaces in dairy plants and subsequent biofilm formation pose a risk of contamination in milk and milk products (Flint et al., 1997; Sharma & Anand, 2002). Formation of multispecies bacterial biofilms is took place by many bacterial genera like Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas which allow the adhesion of other significant pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes (Sasahara & Zottola, 1993). In such biofilms, these microorganisms express an increased resistance to environmental stresses and can persist on food processing equipment (Zottola & Sasahara, 1994; Campanac et al., 2002). The other important biofilm forming genera of dairy industry are Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Listeria, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Coronobacter sakazakii etc. (Durango et al., 2004; Seifu et al., 2004; Kandhai et al., 2010).

Bacillus

Among the different bacterial genera the Bacillus is the predominant bacteria of the dairy plants as present in raw and even pasteurized milk because of its capability to produce heat-resistant spores (Wilkinson and Davies, 1973; Meer et al., 1991; Sharma and Anand, 2002; Ranieri et al., 2009; Shaheen et al., 2010). Within the Bacillus species, B. subtilis is the classical one which is able to form vigorous biofilms in dairy industry (Chu et al., 2006; Vlamakis et al., 2013). It requires mainly carbon and energy to make the biofilm and use a number of sugars, organic acids and different organic compounds for this task (Stanley et al., 2003; Chu et al., 2008; Fujita, 2009).

Pseudomonas

The genus Pseudomonas is another varied bacterial genera in which P. fluorescens is the most common one which is responsible for biofilm formation in the dairy processing units. It is well-known for this cause because of its high heat resistance and short generation time and these characteristics make it a successful biofilm former (Wiedmann et al., 2000; Pereira and Vieira, 2001; Dogan and Boor, 2003; Olofsson et al., 2007).

Listeria

Listeria monocytogenes is the chief player of the biofilm within this genera and its biofilm formation capability varies significantly among serotype/lineage and origin (di Bonaventura et al., 2008; Mu et al., 2014). Though the relationship between lineage and biofilm formation is controversial, as some of researcher states that strains of lineage I have more biofilm producing capacity than those of lineage II while som states just opposite to the above said (Djordjevic et al., 2002; Harvey et al., 2007; Combrouse et al., 2013). The biofilm creation by L. monocytogenes is mainly affected by temperature, strain origin and nutrient level (Nilsson et al., 2011). The L. monocytogenes also has the property of attachment to surfaces passively and its biofilms are primarily comprised of teichoic acids which can grow on polypropylene, steel, rubber and/or glass surfaces (Lemon et al., 2007; Silva et al., 2008; Tresse et al., 2009).

Staphylococcus

Staphylococcus is well recognised bacteria that may form biofilms on food contact surfaces in milk processing plants and especially Staphylococcus epidermidis has been recently described as a main biofilm forming species (Sharma & Anand, 2002; Vuong & Otto, 2002; Piette & Verschraegen, 2009). In the process of staphylococcal biofilm formation, the accumulation and development of a mature stage depend mainly on the polysaccharide intercellular adhesions (PIA) that promote bacterial accumulation, especially polysaccharide poly-N-succinylb- 1-6 glucosamine (PNAG) (Felipe et al., 2017).

Streptococcus

Mostly the cheese section of the dairy industry suffers the most due to the biofilms produced by Streptococcus, more specifically Streptococcus. thermophilus. In the heating chamber of the section where temperature remains within 30 to 730C lies, the maximum degree of biofilm formation occurs by the Streptococcus and thus pasteurized milk get contaminated (Couvigny et al., 2015). As a result the defects in milk and cheese quality like acidic flavour and undesirable texture are spotted (Hup et al., 1980; de Jong et al., 2002; Hood and Zottola, 1995; Palmer et al., 2007). Moreover, different strains of S. thermophilus from different dairy products show variable intensity of ability to produce biofilm ((Lortal et al., 2009; Couvigny et al., 2015; Scatassa et al., 2015).

Lactobacillus

Few strains of Lactobacillus like L. rhamnosus can form biofilms in vitro on the abiotic surfaces (glass or polystyrene) (Lebeer et al., 2007; Leccese et al., 2016). Unlike other bacteria, biofilm formation by Lactobacillus spp. is relatively beneficial because of its property of colonization and longer mucosal permanence of the host as these help in avoiding pathogenic bacterial colonization (Terraf et al., 2012).

  1. coli
  2. coli possesses the capacity to form biofilm structures both in vivo and in vitro. In fact among the facultative anaerobic bacteria of the GI tract, E. colican bloom in a multispecies biofilm environment having their structural characteristics (Costerton et al., 1995Probert and Gibson, 2002). The autoinducer-2 (AI-2) of E. coli O157:H7 act as supplementary force for biofilm production as AI-2 signals regulate chemotaxis, flagellar synthesis and motility of genes (Pillai and Jesudhasan, 2006). The E. coli O157:H7 yields exopolysaccharides (EPS) which helps in cell attachment and formation of 3D structures of biofilms (Ozer and Demirci, 2006).

Miscellaneous

Besides the above one there are various other microbes which form the biofilms in dairy like obligate and facultative thermophiles. The Obligate thermophiles include Anoxybacillus, Flavithermus, Geobacillus spp. which prefer higher temperatures (40-680C) to grow and the facultative thermophiles B. lichenformis, B. coagulans, B. pumilus, B. sporothermodurans also involve in biofilm formation (Ronimus et al., 2003; Schelderman et al., 2005; Scott et al., 2007).

Public Health Significance of Biofilms

The biofilms contribute in the deterioration of food quality due to the action of various microbial enzymes like lipases, proteases. In the dairy sector proteases enzyme play the major role in this regard and it is produced enormously by the different genera of bacteria (Celestino et al., 1997; Santos et al., 2003). Because of the catalytic reactions the biofilms persuade corrosion of metallic food surfaces (Vieira et al., 1993). Also, the microbial quality of the products becomes inferior due to remarkable decrease in the heat transfer efficiency of the surfaces (Mittelman, 1998). The bacterial biofilms can persist in dairy plants and can potentially reduce the self-life of the pasteurized milk, cream, cheese and the other milk products (Gopal et al., 2015; López et al., 2015; Tschiedel et al., 2015). Thus, majority of the food borne bacterial contamination leads to gastroenteritis creating a serious threat to public health and disbalance to the livelihood of mankind.

Prevention and Control Strategy of Biofilms

The easiest, cheapest and the most common measure of arresting the biofilm in the dairy industry is cleaning and disinfecting of the all sites, equipment and instruments especially in the alarming zones (Simões et al., 2006). It prevent the development and spread of biofilms on the surfaces and in the food items (Gibson et al., 1999; Verran, 2002). The efficiency and intensity of cleaning directly affect the final quality of the prepared products (Bremer et al., 2006). The poor cleaning procedures are the causes of retention of biofilms as disinfectants are unable to enter the matrix of biofilms (Simões et al., 2006).

In recent times, many natural compounds like various plant extracts, honey, essential oil (EO) etc. are found effective against microbial biofilm formation. These different natural products are used efficiently against different microbial biofilms in various successful experiments. For example, honey is a natural product having antimicrobial properties against about 60 species of bacteria and fungi (Massocks et al., 2012; Santangelo, 2013; Molan, 2013). It was found that honey helped in inhibiting Enterococcus spp. biofilm production and reducing biofilm formation of EHEC O157:H7 (Lee, 2011; Ng et al., 2014). Even a low concentration of honey can arrest the curling QS expression and virulence genes in bacteria (Lee, 2011). Similarly, essential oils (EOs) are also used against a wide range of pathogens since time immemorial as no antimicrobial resistance occurs (Hammer et al., 1999; Ohno et al., 2003; Ali et al., 2005). But now these are recognised too as an antibiofilm agent (Isman, 2000). As cumin oil and cinnamon oil, both are used in food industry for their aroma, are now also a potent antibiofilmers (Chang et al., 2001; Iacobellis et al., 2005). A few of such natural products are listed in the below table.

Table 1: Different natural elemental extracts effective against various microbial biofilms

Element(s) Extract Against References
Epimedium brevicornum Plant extract Propionibacterium acne Coenye et al., 2012
Malus pumila
Polygonum cuspidatum
Rhodiola crenulata
Dolichos lablab
Melia dubia Bark extract E. coli Ravichandiran et al., 2012
Capparis spinosa Plant extract E. coli Issac et al., 2011
Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
P. mirabilis
Lagerstroemia speciosa Fruit extract Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Singh et al., 2012
Apiaceae family Cumin seed EO Klebsiella pneumoniae Safoura et al., 2010
Cinnamon Cinnamon oil S. mutans & Lactobacillus plantarum Filoche et al., 2005
Cinnamon Cinnamon oil Staphylococcus epidermidis Nuryastuti et al., 2009
Cinnamomum cassia EO Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) & Oliveira et al., 2012
L. monocytogenes
Oregano Oregano EO Staphylococcus & E. coli Nebahat et al., 2010
Brazil nut Brazil nut oil Dental biofilm Filogônio et al., 2011

Besides the plant extract, bio-cleaners (enzyme-based detergents) or green chemicals help extensively in this field and practice of mixture of enzymes promote quicker degradation of biofilm (Sim˜oes et al., 2010). Likewise, phages having polysaccharide degrading enzymes can destroy biofilms rapidly and up to 80% of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms can be destroyed by phages and the bacteriophage T4 found to be effective against E. coli biofilms (Doolittle et al., 1995; Sillankorva et al., 2004). Biosurfactants also use as preventive measures as biosurfactants from Lactococcus lactis 53 inhibit biofilm formation on silicon rubber of the equipments (Rodrigues et al., 2004). The Surfactin produced by Bacillus subtilis prevents Salmonella enterica, E. coli and Proteus mirabilis biofilms (Mireles et al., 2001). In dairy processing sectors biopreservatives like nisin, lauricidin, reuterin, pediocin protect from biofilm formation by various microbes including L. monocytogenes (Dufour et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2004). Moreover, quorum sensing property of the microbes can be inhibited in order to prevent biofilm production at its very early stage (Dong et al., 2002). The use of ultrasound is one of the most recent advances to control and prevent microbial biofilm generation (Kallioinen and Manttari, 2011).

Conclusion

Biofilm formation possesses profound implications and throws a major challenge to the dairy sector where they act as the principal reservoir of microbial contamination. These lead to financial crisis by impairment of raw material and its products. Therefore, choosing of a profound, prominent and efficient measure is in an urge in order to safeguard the whole sector from further deficiency and mitigating the present problem judiciously. The decision adopted should be in harmony with science, capital and time so that no turbulence can slow down its way.

References

  1. Ali, S., Khan, A.A., Ahmed, I., Musaddiq, M., Ahmed, K.S., Polasa, H., Rao, L.V., Habibullah, C.M., Sechi, L.A. and Ahmed, N. (2005). Antimicrobial activities of eugenol and cinnamaldehyde against the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 4:20.
  2. Bardiau, M., Caplinb, J., Detilleuxc, J., Graberd, H., Moronie, P., Taminiaug, B., Mainila, J.G. (2016). Existence of two groups of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis based on biofilm formation, intracellular survival, capsular profile and agr-typing.  Veterinary Microbiology, 185, 1-6.
  3. Bayoumi, M. A., Kamal, R. M., Abd El Aal, S. F., Awad, E. I. (2012). Assessment of a regulatory sanitization process in Egyptian dairy plants in regard to the adherence of some food-borne pathogens and their biofilms. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 158, 225-231.
  4. , P.J., Fillery, S. and McQuillan, A.J. (2006). Laboratory scale clean-in-place (CIP) studies on the effectiveness of different caustic and acid wash steps on the removal of dairy biofilms. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 106,254-262.
  5. Breyers, J.D. and Ratner, J.P. (2004). Bioinspired implant materials befuddle bacteria. American Society for Microbiology News, 70, 232–237.
  6. Burgess, S.A., Lindsay, D. and Flint, S.H. (2010). Thermophilic bacilli and their importance in dairy processing. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 144, 215–225.
  7. Busscher, H.J., Bos, R. and Vander, M.H.C. (1995). Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 128, 229–234.
  8. Campanac, C., Pineau, L., Payard, A., Baziard-Mouysset, G. and Roques, C. (2002). Interactions between biocide cationic agents and bacterial biofilms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 46, 1469-1474.
  9. Celestino, E.L., Iyer, M. and Roginski, H. (1997). The effects of refrigerated storage of raw milk on the quality of whole milk powder stored for different periods. International Dairy Journal, 7, 119–127.
  10. Chae, M. S., Schraft, H., Truelstrup, L., & Mackereth, R. (2006). Effects of physicochemical surface characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains on attachment to glass. Food Microbiology, 23, 250–259.
  11. Chang, S.T., Chen, P.F. and Chang, C.C. (2001). Antibacterial activity of leaf essential oils and their constituents from Cinnamomum osmophloeum. J Ethnopharmacol, 77, 123–7.
  12. Chen, J., Rossman, M.L. and Pawar, D.M., (2007). Attachment of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to the surface of beef and a culture medium. Food Science and Technology, 40, 249–254.
  13. , R.A.N. and Frank., J.F. (2006). A predictive model for heat inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm on buna-N rubber. Food Science and Technology, 39, 11–19.
  14. Chu, F., Kearns, D.B., McLoon, A., Chai, Y., Kolter R, Losick R, (2008). A novel regulatory protein governing biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiolgy, 68, 1117–1127.
  15. Chu, F., Kearns, D.B., Branda, S.S., Kolter, R., Losick, R., (2006). Targets of the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiolgy, 59, 1216–1228.
  16. Coenye, T., Brackman, G., Rigole, P., DeWitte, E., Honraet, K., Rossel, B., Nelis, H.J. (2012). Eradication of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms by plant extracts and putative identification of icariin, resveratrol and salidroside as active compounds. Phytomedicine, 19, 409–12.
  17. Combrouse, T., Sadovskaya, I., Faille, C., Kol, O., Guérardel, Y., and Midelet-Bourdin, G. (2013). Quantification of the extracellular matrix of the Listeria monocytogenes biofilms of different phylogenic lineages with optimization of culture conditions. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 114, 1120–1131.
  18. Costerton, J.W., Stewart, P.S. and Greenberg, E.P. (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.Science, 284,1318e1322, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318.
  19. Costerton, J.W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D.E., Korber, D.R., Lappin-Scott, H.M. (1995). Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol, 49,711–745.
  20. Costerton, J.W., Lewandowski, Z., Debeer, D., Caldwell, D. and Korber, D. (1994). Biofilms, the customized microniche. Journal of Bacteriology, 176, 2137–2142.
  21. Couvigny, B., Thérial, C., Gautier, C., Renault, P., Briandet, R. and Guédon, E. (2015). Streptococcus thermophiles biofilm formation: a remnant trait of ancestral commensal life?PLoS One 10:e0128099. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128099.
  22. Daniels, R., Vanderleyden, J., & Michiels, J. (2004). Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 28, 261–289.
  23. Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998). The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science, 280, 295–298.
  24. De Jong, P., Te Giffel, M.C. and Kiezebrink, E.A. (2002). Prediction of the adherence, growth and release of microorganisms in production chains. International Journal of Food Microbiology.74:13–25. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00713-9.
  25. De Rezende, C.E., Anriany, Y., Carr, L.E., Joseph, S.W. and Weiner, R.M. (2005). Capsular polysaccharide surrounds smooth and rugose types of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71: 7345–7351.
  26. Di Bonaventura, G., Piccolomini, R., Paludi, D., D’Orio V, Vergara, A., Conter, M. and Ianieri, A. (2008). Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104, 1552–1561.
  27. Djordjevic, D., Wiedmann, M. and McLandsborough, L.A. (2002). Microtiter plate assay for assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68, 2950–2958.
  28. Dogan, B. and Boor, K.J. (2003). Genetic diversity and spoilage potential among Pseudomonas spp. isolated from fluid milk products and dairy processing plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 69,130–138.
  29. Dong, Y.H., Gusti, A.R., Zhang, Q., Xu, J.L. and Zhang, L.H. (2002). Identification of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactonases from Bacillus Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68, 1754-1759.
  30. Donlan, R.M. and Costerton, J.W. (2002). Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clinical Microbiolgy Rev, 15, 167–193.
  31. Donlan, R.M. (2002). Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces. Emerging Infectious Disase, 8, 881–890.
  32. Doolittle, M.M., Cooney, J.J. and Caldwell, D.E. (1995). Lytic infection of Escherichia coli biofilms by bacteriophage T4. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 41: 12-18.
  33. Dufour, M., Simmonds, R.S. and Bremer, P.J. (2004). Development of a laboratory scale clean-in-place system to test the effectiveness of “natural” antimicrobials against dairy biofilms. Journal of Food Protection, 67, 1438-1443.
  34. Durango, J., Arrieta, G. and Mattar, S. (2004). Presence of Salmonella as a risk to public health in the Caribbean zone of Colombia. Biomedica, 24, 89–96.
  35. Fatemi, P. and Frank, J.F. (1999) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Pseudomonas biofilms by peracid sanitizers. Journal of Food Protection, 62, 761–765.
  36. Felipe, V., Morgante, C.A., Somale, P.S., Varroni, F., Vandevivere, P. and Kirchman, D. L. (1993). Attachment stimulates exopolysaccharide synthesis by a bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59: 3280–3286.
  37. Felipe, V., Morgante, C.A., Somale, P.S., Varroni, F., Zingaretti, M.L., Bachetti, R.A., Correa, S.G. and Porporatto, C. (2017). Evaluation of the biofilm forming ability and its associated genes in Staphylococcus species isolates from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy farms. Microbial Pathogenesis, 104, 278-286.
  38. Filoche, S.K., Soma, K. and Sissons, C.H. (2005). Antimicrobial effects of essential oil in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate. Oral Microbiol Immunol , 20, 221–5.
  39. Filogˆonio, C.F., Soares, R.V., Horta, M.C., Penido, C.V. and Cruz, R.A. (2011). Effect of vegetable oil (Brazil nut oil) and mineral oil (liquid petrolatum) on dental biofilm control. Brazilian Oral Research, 25,556–61.
  40. Flemming, H.C. and Wingender, J. (2010).The biofilm matrix, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8: 623e633, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0892701031000072190.
  41. Flint, S.H, Bremer, P.J and Brooks, J.D. (1997). Biofilms in dairy manufacturing plant—description, current concerns and methods of control. Biofouling, 11, 81–97.
  42. Forsythe, S.J. and Hayes, P.R. (1998). Food hygiene, microbiology and HACCP (3rd). Aspen Publishers.
  43. Fox, L.K., Zadoks, R.N., Gaskins, C.T. (2005). Biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus associated with intramammary infection, Veterinary Microbiology, 107, 295-299.
  44. Frank, J.F., Ehlers, J. and Wicker, L. (2003). Removal of Listeria monocytogenes and poultry soil-containing biofilms using chemical cleaning and sanitizing agents under static conditions. Food Protection Trends, 23, 654–663.
  45. Y., (2009). Carbon catabolite control of the metabolic network in Bacillus subtilis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 73, 245–259.
  46. Gibson, H., Taylor, J.H., Hall, K.E. and Holah, J.T. (1999). Effectiveness of cleaning techniques used in the food industry in terms of the removal of bacterial biofilms. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 87, 41–48.
  47. Gopal, N., Hill, C., Ross, P.R., Beresford, T. P., Fenelon, M. A. and Cotter, P.D. (2015). The prevalence and control of Bacillusand related spore-forming bacteria in the dairy industry. 6:1418. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01418.
  48. Hammer, K., Carson, C. and Riley, T. (1999). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. Journal of Applied Microbiolgy, 86,985–90.
  49. Harbron, R. S. and Kent, C. A. (1988). Aspects of cell adhesion. In L. F. Melo, T. R. Bott, & C. A. Bernardo (Eds.), NATO ASI series,145, 125–140.
  50. Harvey, J., Keenan, K.P. and Gilmour, A. (2007). Assessing biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes strains. Food Microbiology, 24, 380–392.
  51. Hood, S.K. and Zottola, E.A. (1997). Isolation and identification of adherent Gram-negative microorganisms from four meat-processing facilities. Journal of Food Protection, 60, 1135–1138.
  52. Hood, S.K. and Zottola, Z.E. (1995). Biofilms in food processing.Food Control, 6, 9–18.
  53. Hup, G., Bangma, A., Stadhouders, J. and Bouman, S. (1980). Growth of thermoresistant Streptococci in cheese-milk pasteurisers: I. Some observations in cheese factories. North Eur Dairy Journal,46,245–251.
  54. Iacobellis, N.S, Cantore, P.L., Capasso, F. and Senatore, F., (2005). Antibacterial activity of Cuminum cyminum L. andCarum carvi L. essential oils. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 53, 57–61.
  55. Isman, M.B. (2000). Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Protection, 19, 603–8.
  56. Issac, A.S.V., Palani, A., Ramaswamy, B.R., Shunmugiah, K.P. and Arumugam, V.R. (2011). Antiquorum sensing and antibiofilm potential of Capparis spinosa. Archives of Medical Research, 42, 658–68.
  57. Jahn, A., and Nielsen, P. H. (1998). Cell biomass and exopolymer composition in sewer biofilms. Water Science and Technology, 37, 17–24.
  58. Jessen, B. and Lammert, L. (2003). Biofilm and disinfection in meat processing plants. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 51, 265–269.
  59. Johnston, N. (2004). Debaffling biofilms studies follow transformations and detail a major signal. Scientist, 18, 34–35.
  60. Kallioinen, M. and Manttari, M. (2011). Influence of ultrasonic treatment on various membrane materials: areview. Seperation Science and Technology.46(9), 1388–95.
  61. Kandhai, M.C., Heuvelink, A.E., Reij, M.W., Beumer, R.R., Dijk, R., Van Tilburg, J.J.H.C., van, Schothorst, M., Gorris, L.G.M. (2010). A study into the occurrence of Cronobacter spp. in The Netherlands between 2001 and 2005. Food Control, 21 (8): 1127–1136.
  62. Krysinski, E.P., Brown, L.J. and Marchisello, T.J. (1992). Effect of cleaners and sanitizers on Listeria monocytogenes attached to product contact surfaces. Journal of Food Protection, 55, 246–251.
  63. Lebeer, S., Verhoeven, T.L.A., Perea Velez, M., Vanderleyden, J. and De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. (2007). Impact of enviromental and genetic factor son biofilms formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus Applied Environmental Microbiology, 3:6768–6775.
  64. Leccese, M., Juárez, M., Rault, L., Le, Loir. Y., Even, S. and Nader-Macías, M. (2016). Biofilms of vaginal Lactobacillus rhamnosusCRL 1332: Kinetics of formation and matrix chatecterization. Archives of Microbiology, 198,689–700.
  65. Lee, J.H. (2011). Low concentrations of honey reduce biofilm formation, quorum sensing and virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biofouling, 27:1095–104.
  66. Lemon, K.P., Higgins, D.E. and Kolter, R. (2007). Flagellar motility is critical for Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Journal of Bacteriology, 189: 4418–4424.
  67. López, A.C., Minnaard, J., Pérez, P.F. and Alippi, A.M. (2015). A case of intoxication due to a highly cytotoxic Bacillus cereusstrain isolated from cooked chicken. 46: 195–199. 10.1016/j.fm.2014.08.005.
  68. Lortal, S., Di Blasi, A., Madec, M.N., Pediliggieri, C., Tuminello, L., Tanguy, G., Fauquant, J., Lecuona, Y., Campo, P., Carpino, S. and Licitra, G. (2009). Tina wooden vat biofilm: a safe and highly efficient lactic acid bacteria delivering system in PDO Ragusano cheese making. International Journal of Food Microbiology,132:1–8.
  69. Meer, R.R., Baker, J., Bodyfelt, F.W. and Griffiths, M.W. (1991). Psychrotrophic Bacillus in fluid milk products: a review. Journal of Food Protection, 54, 969–979.
  70. Midelet, G. and Carpentier, B. (2002). Transfer of microorganisms, including Listeria monocytogenes, from various materials to beef. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68: 4015–4024.
  71. Mireles, J.R., Toguchi, A. and Harshey, R.M. (2001). Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium swarming mutants with altered biofilm-forming abilities: surfactin inhibits biofilm formation. Journal of Bacteriology, 183, 5848-5854.
  72. Mittelman, M.W. (1998). Structure and functional characteristics of bacterial biofilms in fluid processing operations. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 2760–2764.
  73. Molan, P.C. (2013). Honey as a tropical antibacterial agent for treatment of infectedwounds.http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2001/november/Molan/honey-as-topical-agent.html.
  74. Morris, C.E., Monier, J.M. and Jacques, M.A. (1997). Methods for observing microbial biofilms directly on leaf surfaces and recovering them for isolation of culturable microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 1570–1576.
  75. Mu, H., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., Niu, H. and  Duan, J.( 2014).  Inhibitory effects of chitosan in combination with antibiotics on Listeria monocytogenes biofilm. Food Control, 38, 215-220.
  76. Mustapha, A. and Liewen, M.B. (1989). Destruction of Listeria monocytogenes by sodium hypochlorite and quaternary ammonium sanitizers. Journal of Food Protection, 5 2, 306–311.
  77. Nebahat Bo., Leyla, V., Berna, D., Cigdem, S., Abamuslum,. G, Murat, G., Kemal, H.C.B. and Mine, K. (2010). Effect of oregano essential oil on biofilms formed by Staphylococci and Escherichia coli. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 16(suppl A):S23–9.
  78. Ng, W.J., Lim, K.Y., Chong, J.Y. and Low, K.L. (2014). In vitro screening of honey against Enterococcus spp. biofilm. Journal of Medical Bioengineering, 23–8.
  79. Nilsson, R.E., Ross, T., Bowman, J.P., 2011. Variability in biofilm production by Listeria monocytogenes correlated to strain origin and growth conditions. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 150, 14–24.
  80. Nuryastuti, T., van der Mei, H.C., Busscher, H.J., Iravati, S., Aman, A.T. and Krom, B.P. (2009). Effect of cinnamon oil on icaA expression and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 75, 6850–5.
  81. Ohno, T., Kita, M., Yamaoka, Y., Imamura, S., Yamamoto, T., Mitsufuji, S., Kodama, T. and Kashima, K., Imanishi. (2003). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter, 8(3):207–15.
  82. Oliveira, M.M., Brugnera, D.F., Nasciment, J.D., Batista, N.N. and Piccoli, R.H. (2012). Cinnamon essential oil and cinamaldehyde in the control of bacterial biofilm formed on stainless steel surfaces. European Food Research and Technology, 234,821–32.
  83. Olofsson, T.C., Ahrné, S. and Molin, G. (2007). Composition of the bacterial population of refrigerated beef, identified with direct 16S rRNA gene analysis and pure culture technique. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 118, 233–240.
  84. Oulahal, N., Brice, W., Martial, A., & Degraeve, P. (2008). Quantitative analysis of survival Staphylococcus aureus or Listeria innocua on two types of surfaces: propylene and stainless steel in contact with three different dairy products. Food Control, 19, 178–185.
  85. Ozer, N. P., & Demirci, A. (2006). Electrolyzed oxidizing water treatment for decontamination of raw salmon inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes Scott A and response surface modeling. Journal of Food Engineering, 72, 234-241.
  86. Palmer, J., Flint S. and Brooks, J. (2007). Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,34,577–588. doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0234-4.
  87. Pan, Y., Breidt, F. and Kathariou, S. (2009). Competition of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 1/2a and 4b strains in mixed-culture biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 75: 5846–5852.
  88. Parsek, M. R., and Greenberg, E. P. (2005). Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends in Microbiology, 13, 27–33.
  89. Patel, J. D., Ebert, M., Ward, R., & Anderson, J. M. (2007). S. epidermidis biofilm formation: effects of biomaterial surface chemistry and serum proteins. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 80, 742–751.
  90. Pereira, M.O. and Vieira, M.J. (2001). Effects of the interactions between glutaraldehyde and the polymeric matrix on the efficacy of the biocide against Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms. Biofouling, 17, 93–101.
  91. Piette, A., & Verschraegen, G. (2009). Role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in human disease. Veterinary Microbiology, 134, 45e54.
  92. Pillai, S.D., Jesudhasan, P.R., (2006). Quorum sensing: how bacteria communicate. Food Technology, 60, 42–50.
  93. Probert, H.M. and Gibson, G.R. (2002). Bacterial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology, 3, 23–27.
  94. Ranieri, M.L., Huck, J.R., Sonnen, M., Barbano, D.M. and Boor, K.J. (2009). High temperature, short time pasteurization temperatures inversely affect bacterial numbers during refrigerated storage of pasteurized fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4823–4832.
  95. Ravichandiran, V., Shanmugam, K., Anupama, K., Thomas, S. and Princy, A. (2012). Structure-based virtual screening for plant-derived SdiA-selective ligands as potential antivirulent agents against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 48,200–5.
  96. Rodrigues, L.R., van der Mei, H.C., Teixeira, J.A. and Oliveira, R. (2004). Biosurfactant from Lactococcus lactis 53 inhibits microbial adhesion on silicone rubber. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 66, 306-311.
  97. Ronimus, R.S., Parker, L.E., Turner, N., Poudel, S., Ruckert, A. and Morgan, H.W. (2003). A RAPD-based comparison of thermophilic bacilli from milk powders. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 85, 45–61.
  98. Safoura, D., Morteza, S. and Mohsen, B. (2010). Effect of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed essential oil biofilm formation and plasmid integrity of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 6, 57–61.
  99. Santangelo, E.F. (2013). Honey. http://flipper.diff.org/app/items/info/4617.
  100. Santos, M.V., Ma, Y., Caplan, Z. and Barbano, D.M. (2003). Sensory threshold of off-flavors caused by proteolysis and lipolysis in milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 1601–1607.
  101. Sasahara, K. C., & Zottola, E. A. (1993). Biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes utilizes a primary colonizing microorganism in flowing systems. Journal of Food Protection, 56, 1022-1028.
  102. Sauer, K., Camper, A.K., Ehrlich, G.D., Costerton, J.W. and Davies, D.G. (2002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. Bacteriology, 184, 1140–1154.
  103. Sauer, K., and Camper, A. K. (2001). Characterization of phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas putida in response to surface-associated growth. Journal of Bacteriology, 183, 6579–6589.
  104. Scatassa, M.L., Gaglio, R., Macaluso, G., Francesca, N., Randazzo, W., Cardamone, C., Grigoli Di, A., Moschetti, G. and Settanni, L. (2015). Transfer, composition and technological characterization of the lactic acid bacterial populations of the wooden vats used to produce traditional stretched cheeses. Food Microbiology, 52, 31–41.
  105. Scheldeman, P., Pil, A., Herman, L., De Vos, P. and Heyndrickx, M. (2005). Incidence and diversity of potentially highly heat-resistant spores isolated at dairy farms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71: 1480–1494.
  106. Scott, S.A., Brooks, J.D., Rakonjac, J., Walker, K.M.R. and Flint, S.H. (2007). The formation of thermophilic spores during the manufacture of whole milk powder. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 60, 109–117.
  107. Seifu, E., Buys, E.M., Donkin, E.F. and Petzer, I.M. (2004). Antibacterial activity of the lactoperoxidase system against food-borne pathogens in Saanen and South African indigenous goat milk. Food Control, 15, 447–452.
  108. Shaheen, R., Svensson, B., Andersson, M.A., Christiansson, A. and Salkinoja-Salonen, M. (2010). Persistence strategies of Bacillus cereus spores isolated from dairy silo tanks. Food Microbiology, 27, 347–355.
  109. Sharma, M. and Anand, S.K. (2002). Biofilms evaluation as an essential component of HACCP for food/dairy industry — a case. Food Control, 13, 469–477.
  110. Sharma, M., and Anand, S. K. (2002). Characterization of constitutive microflora of biofilms in dairy processing lines. Food Microbiology, 19, 627-636.
  111. Sillankorva, S., Oliveira, D.R., Vieira, M.J., Sutherland, I.W. and Azeredo, J. (2004). Bacteriophage Φ S1 infection of Pseudomonas fluorescens planktonic cells versus biofilms. Biofouling. 20: 133-138.
  112. Silva, S., Teixeira, P., Oliveira, R. and Azeredo, J. (2008). Adhesion to and viability of Listeria monocytogeneson food contact surfaces. Food Microbiology, 71: 1379–1385.
  113. Sim˜oes, M., Sim˜oes, L.C. and Vieira, M.J. (2010). A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies. Food Science Technology, 43:573–583.
  114. Simões, M., Simões, L.C., Machado, I., Pereira, M.O. and Vieira, M.J. (2006). Control of flow-generated biofilms using surfactants – evidence of resistance and recovery. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 84,338-345.
  115. Sinde, E. and Carballo, J. (2000). Attachment of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, rubber and polytetrafluorethylene: the influence of free energy and the effect of commercial sanitizers. Food Microbiology, 17, 439–447.
  116. Singh, B.N., Singh, H.B., Singh, A., Singh, B.R., Mishra. A. and Nautiyal, C.S. (2012). Lagerstroemia speciosa fruit extract modulates quorum sensing-controlled virulence factor production and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 158(2):529–38.
  117. Stanley, N.R., Britton, R.A., Grossman, A.D. and Lazazzera, B.A., (2003). Identification of catabolite repression as a physiological regulator of biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis by use of DNA microarrays. Journal of Bacteriology, 185, 1951–1957.
  118. Stoodley, P., Lewandowski, Z., Boyle, J.D. and Lappin-Scott, H.M. (1999). The formation of migratory ripples in a mixed species bacterial biofilm growing in turbulent flow. Environmental Microbiology, 1, 447–455.
  119. Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D.G. and Costerton, J.W. (2002). Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annual Review of Microbiology. 56: 187–209.
  120. Terraf, M.C., Juarez, M.S., Nader-Macias, M.E. and Silva, C. (2012). Screening of biofilm formation by beneficial vaginal lactobacilli and influence of culture media components. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113:1517–1529.
  121. Tresse, O., Lebret, V., Garmyn, D. and Dussurget, O. (2009). The impact of growth history and flagellation on the adhesion of various Listeria monocytogenes strains to polystyrene. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 55: 189–196.
  122. Tschiedel, E., Rath, P.M., Steinmann, J., Becker, H., Dietrich, R., Paul A. (2015). Lifesaving liver transplantation for multi-organ failure caused by Bacillus cereusfood poisoning. 19 E11–E14. 10.1111/petr.12378.
  123. Verran, J. (2002). Biofouling in food processing: biofilm or biotransfer potential? Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers. 80(C): 292–298.
  124. Vieira, M.J., Melo, L. and Pinheiro, M.M. (1993). Biofilm formation: hydrodynamic effects on internal diffusion and structure. Biofouling. 7: 67–80.
  125. Vlamakis, H., Chai, Y., Beauregard, P., Losick, R., Kolter, R., (2013). Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 11, 157–168.
  126. Vuong, C. and Otto, M. (2002). Staphylococcus epidermidis Microbes and Infection, 4: 481-489.
  127. Vuong, C., & Otto, M. (2002). Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes and Infection, 4, 481e489.
  128. Wang R. (2019). Biofilms and Meat Safety: A Mini-Review. International Association for Food Protection, doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-311.
  129. Way, S.S., Thompson, L.J., Lopes, J.E., Hajjar, A.M., Kollmann, T.R., Freitag, N.E. and Wilson, C.B. (2004). Characterization of flagellin expression and its role in Listeria monocytogenes infection and immunity. Cellular Microbiology, 6: 235–242.
  130. Wiedmann, M., Weilmeier, D., Dineen, S.S., Malyea, R. and Boor, K.J. (2000). Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Pseudomonas sp. isolated from milk. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66: 2085–2095.
  131. Wilkinson, G. and Davies, F.L. (1973). Germination of spores of Bacillus cereus in milk and milk dialysates: effect of heat treatment. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 36: 485–496.
  132. Zhao, T., Doyle, M.P. and Zhao, P. (2004). Control of Listeria monocytogenes in a biofilm by competitive-exclusion microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 46, 39-56.
  133. Zobell, C.E. (1943). The effect of solid surfaces upon bacterial activity. Journal of Bacteriology, 46: 39–56.
  134. Zottola, E. A., & Sasahara, K. C. (1994). Microbial biofilms in the food-processing industry should they be a concern. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 23, 125-148.
Abstract Read : 311 Downloads : 78
Previous Next

Submit Case Reports for Special Issue (Dec’19)

Recommend IJLR to include in UGC-CARE list

Download Completed format here

IJLR_UGC CARE Recommendation

And

Recommendations of new journals should be routed by universities and colleges as follows:

  1. Universities: IQAC cell to respective regional CARE University
  2. Affiliated colleges: College IQAC cell to parent university’s IQAC cell. Parent university IQAC cell will forward to respective regional CARE University.

You can find Zonal UGC-CARE address here https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/site/website/ugc-contact.aspx

Close