NAAS Score 2019

                   5.36

Declaration Format

Please download DeclarationForm and submit along with manuscript.

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Clinical and Haematobiochemical Changes in Cattle with Theileria orientalis Infection

N. Devadevi K. Rajkumar P. Vijayalakshmi S. Venkatesa Perumal
Vol 8(12), 258-263
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180321021002

Out of 110 animals suspected for theileriosis, 100 cattle were positive for T. orientalis infection. The predominant clinical signs were tick infestation (45%), anorexia (80%), pyrexia (22%), swollen lymph node (83%), pale conjunctival mucous membrane (73%), nasal discharge (65%), bruxism (43%), dyspnoea (67%), tachycardia (71%), reduced milk yield (62.35%) and lameness (12%). Haematological analysis revealed significant (P<0.05) decrease in haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (PCV), red blood cells (RBC) and platelets and significant (P<0.05) increase in mean corpuscular volume and eosinophil count. Serum biochemistry revealed significant (P<0.05) reduction in mean serum albumin and albumin: globulin ratio and significant (P<0.01) increase in mean total protein and globulin was observed in Theileria infected cattle to the control.


Keywords : Cattle Clinical Signs Haemato-biochemical Theileria orientalis

Theileriosis is a tick borne protozoan disease of cattle, sheep and goats caused by Theileria spp. Benign tropical theileriosis found worldwide is caused by T. buffeli/T. orientalis and T. sergenti and transmitted by the tick, Haemaphysalis spp. (Radostits et al., 2010). Theileria orientalis classified into eight genotypes (chitose = type 1, ikeda = type 2, buffeli = type 3 and types 4–8), based on DNA sequencing of PCR-amplified regions of the major piroplasm surface protein (MPSP) and/or small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA (SSU) genes. Ikeda and chitose genotypes were associated with pathogenic form, whereas other genotypes appear to relate to benign infections in cattle (Kakuda et al.,1998; Gubbels et al., 2000). The present study describes the clinical signs and haemato-biochemical alterations in cattle naturally infected with T. orientalis in the Puducherry state.

Materials and Methods

A total of one hundred and ten animals during a period from January to August 2014 comprising sixty two crossbred cattle, twenty five Holstein Friesian cross, fifteen Hallikar and remaining non-descript suspected for theileriosis were included in the study. Theileriosis was diagnosed based on the clinical signs (fever and enlarged lymph nodes), detection of parasites and polymerase chain reaction. Five milliliter of venous blood samples were collected aseptically in clean glass vials contain EDTA (1mg/ml of blood) for complete haemogram and were estimated as per standard methods. Five millilitre of the blood was collected and allowed to clot and the serum was separated by centrifugation (Hemi Pvt. Lt) (Col and Uslu, 2007). Serum was used for estimation of total protein, albumin by modified Biuret and Doumas method, creatinine, AST and ALT (Tietz, 1986) using semi autoanalyser (Secoman). A group of ten cattle which were apparently healthy and negative for theileriosis infections constituted control group.

Statistical Analysis

Data recorded in this study were subjected to statistical analysis using Graph Pad Prism 6. Student’s t-test was used to analyse haematological and biochemical values between healthy and diseased animals.

Result and Discussion

The incidence of theileriosis among cattle presented to Large Animal Medical Unit, Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry was 24.21 per cent (n=413). Out of 110 cattle with clinical manifestations suggestive of theileriosis, 100 cattle were found positive for Theileria infection which is in agreement with Keles et al. (2001) and Kamau et al. (2011) who reported that theileriosis in cattle was endemic in tropical regions, parts of Australia and north east China, whereas Chaisi et al. (2013) reported an incidence of Theileria orientalis was 5.8% in South Africa. The incidence of theileriosis was highest in cross breed Jersey (59%), followed by Holstein Friesian cross (23%) and Hallikar (13%) which is in concurrence with the report of Kachani et al. (1992), Radostits et al. (2010) opined that indigenous cattle breeds were less clinically affected than exotic breeds of cattle. The predominant clinical signs in these animals were swollen lymph node (83%), anorexia (80%), pale conjunctival mucus membrane (73%), tachycardia (71%), dyspnoea (67%), nasal discharge (65%), reduced milk yield (62.35%), tick infestation (45%), bruxism (43%), diarrhoea (37%), pyrexia (22%) and lacrimation & lameness (12%) which is in agreement with the reports of Col and Uslu (2006) and Ugalmugle et al. (2010) (Table 1). Hussein et al. (2007) observed corneal opacity as a result of white blood cells infiltration; anorexia could be attributed to persistent fever, enlargement of lymph nodes to lymphoid hyperplasia. In the present study, corneal opacity was reported in 3 percent of cases in cattle with theileriosis. In the present study in addition to the above said clinical manifestations, bruxism was reported in 43 per cent of cases.

Table 1: Clinical manifestations in cattle with theileriosis

S. No. Clinical Manifestation Percentage (%) (n=100)
1 Opacity of eye 3
2 Diarrhoea 37
3 Nasal discharge 65
4 Lacrimation 12
5 Dyspnoea 67
6 Bruxism 43
7 Skin lesions 2
8 Tachycardia 71
9 Nervous signs 4
10 Lameness 12
11 Tick infestation 45
12 Anorexia 80
13 Pyrexia 22
14 Swollen lymph node 83
15 Pale mucus membrane 73

 

Fig. 1: Corneal opacity in cattle with T.orientalis infection Fig. 2: Severe tick infestation  in cattle with T. orientalis infection
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 3: Enlarged pre-scapular lymph node in cattle with theileriosis

The haematological values of apparently healthy cattle and cattle with theileriosis were given in Table 2. Haematological values revealed significant (P<0.05) decrease in mean Hb (8.8±1.95g/dl), PCV (27.5±0.5%), RBC (4.8±0.93×106cells/mm3) and mean platelet count (1.25±0.58×105cells/mm3) and significantly (P<0.05) increase in mean MCV (57.35±0.36fl) and eosinophil count (0.017±3.01×10³cells/ mm³) in cattle with theileriosis compare with control mean which is in agreement with Col and Uslu (2006) and Qayyum et al. (2010) reported significant (P<0.05) decrease in Hb, PCV and RBC count. Mean MCV was significantly (P<0.05) higher in cattle with theileriosis. Macrocytic normochromic anaemia was noticed in cattle with theileriosis which is in agreement with Muraleedharan et al. (2005).

Table 2: Haematology of cattle with theileriosis

Parameters Apparently Healthy Cattle (n=10) Cattle with Theileriosis  (n=100)  “t”
Haemoglobin (g/dl) 10.48±0.45 8.8±0.195 4.24*
Packed Cell Volume (%) 29.9±0.94 27.5±0.5 2.76*
RBC (106 cells/mm³) 5.47±0.26 4.8±0.93 5.56 *
MCV (fl) 54.19±2.15 57.35±0.36 2.36 *
MCH (pg) 18.34±0.77 18.61±0.25 0.32NS
MCHC (%) 33.6±0.54 32.42±0.37 0.98NS
WBC (10³cells/ mm³) 12±1.61 11.1±0.5 0.59NS
Neutrophils (10³cells/ mm³) 4.56±0.65 3.74±0.02 1.11NS
Lymphocytes (10³cells/ mm³) 7.46±1.18 7.20±0.39 0.34NS
Eosinophils (10³cells/ mm³) 0.004±2.6 0.017±3.01 1.33*
Monocytes (10³cells/ mm³)      0.0007±0.73 0.0083±1.7 1.4NS
Platelets (105cells/ mm³) 2.19±1.03 1.25±0.58 4.49 **

**Significant (P<0.01); * Significant (P<0.05); NS: Not significant (P>0.05)

The mean serum biochemical values of apparently healthy cattle and cattle with theileriosis in cattle are presented in the Table 3. Serum biochemistry revealed significant (P<0.05) reduction in mean serum albumin (20.44±0.91g/L) and alteration in albumin: globulin (0.52±0.4) ratio was observed to their control mean (22.74±3.12g/L and 0.67±0.12) which is similar to the findings of Aulakh and Singla (2006). A significant (P<0.01) increase in mean total protein (82.1±3.5 (g/L) and mean globulin (61.7±3.75g/L) was observed in cattle with theileriosis when compared to that of control mean (57.7±5.9g/L and 34.9±4.11g/L). The mean creatinine (1.17±0.04mg/dl), AST (133.3±38.84 IU/L) and ALT (79.6±26.11 IU/L) in these animals did not show any significant difference.

 

 

 

 

Table 3: Serum biochemistry of cattle with theileriosis

Parameters Apparently Healthy Cattle  (n=10) Cattle with Theileriosis (n=100) “t”
Total protein (g/L) 57.7±5.9 82.1±3.5 4.18**
Albumin (g/L) 22.74±3.12 20.44±0.91 2.03*
Globulin (g/L) 34.9±4.11 61.7±3.75 5.02**
Albumin: Globulin 0.67±0.12 0.52±0.4 0.095*
Creatinine (mg/ dL) 1.25±0.13 1.17±0.04 0.61NS
AST ( IU/ L) 119±38.7 133.3±38.84 1.12NS
ALT (IU/ L) 51.5±4.15 79.6±26.11 1.06NS

**Significant (P<0.01); * Significant (P<0.05); NS- Not significant (P>0.05)

Conclusion

The incidence of theileriosis in the present study was 24.21 per cent among the one hundred and ten animals registered in large animal medicine unit. Theileriosis was diagnosed based on the clinical signs (fever and enlarged lymph nodes), detection of parasites and polymerase chain reaction. From the present study the predominant clinical signs in theileriosis were enlarged lymphnode, pale mucous membrane, anorexia, tachycardia, dyspnoea, tick infestation and bruxism. Haematological alterations included macrocytic normochromic anemia, eosinophilia with thrombocytopenia. Serum biochemistry showed alteration in albumin: globulin ratio, hyperproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia with hyperglobulinemia in cattle with theleriosis.

References

  1. Aulakh GS and Singla, LD. 2006. Clinico-haematobiochemical observations on bovines naturally infected with Theileria annulata. J Vet Parasitol, 20:49-52.8.
  2. Chaisi ME, Janssens ME, Vermeiren L, Oosthuizen MC, Collins NE and Geysen D. 2013. Evalution of a real- time pcr test for the detection and discrimination of Theileria pecies in the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). PLOS ONE, 10:
  3. Col R and Uslu U. 2006. Hematological and coagulation profiles during severe tropical theileriosis in cattle. J Vet Anim Sci, 30: 577-582.
  4. Gubbels MJ, Hong Y, Weide MV, Qi B, Nijman IJ, Guangyuan L and Jongejan F.  Molecular characterisation of the Theileria buffeli/orientalis group. International Journal Parasitology, 30: 943-952.
  5. Hussein AH, Mohammed, NAES and  Mohammed  2007. Theileriosis  and Babesiosis in cattle: haemogram and some biochemical parameters. ISAH Tartu Estonia, 18: 143-150.
  6. Kachani M, Oliver RA, Brown CGD, Ouhelli H and Spooner RL. 1992. Common and stage specific antigens of annulata. Vet Immun Immunopath, 34: 221-234.
  7. Kakuda T, Shiki M,  Kubota S,  Sugimoto C,  Brown WC, Kosum C,  Nopporn S and Onuma M. 1998. Phylogeny of benign Theileria species from cattle in Thailand China and the U.S.A. based on the major piroplasm surface protein and small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. Int J Parasitol, 28:1261.
  8. Kamau J, Vos AJD, Playford M, Salim B, Kinyanjul P and Sugimoto C. 2011. Emergenceof new types of Theileria orientalis in Australian cattle and possible cause of theileriosis outbreaks. Parasites & Vectors, 4: 22.
  9. Keles I, Deger S, Altug N, Karaca M and Akdemir C. 2001. Tick borne disease in cattle: clinical and haematological findings, diagnosis, treatment, seasonal distribution, breed, sex and age factors and the transmitters of the disease. YYU. Vet Fak Derg, 12:26-32.
  10. Muraleedharan K, Ziauddin KS, Hussain PM, Puttabyattappa R and Seshadri 2005. Haematological observations on Theileria annulata infection in cattle and buffaloes. J Vet Parasitol, 19: 71-72.
  11. Qayyum A, Farooq U, Samad HA and Chauhdry  2010. Prevalence, clinico-therapeutic and prophylactic studies on theileriosis in district Sahiwal (Pakistan). The J Ani &Plant Sci, 20: 266-270.
  12. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW and Constable PD. 2010. Veterinary Medicine, A textbook of the diseases of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and horses. 10th ed., Book power Saunders, London, New York, pp: 1526-1531.
  13. Tietz 1986. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry, W.B. Saunders. pp: 589.
  14. Ugalmugla SS, Jayraw AK and Gatne ML. 2010. Prevalence and clinical pathology of bovine tropical theileriosis in cross-bred population of Ahmednagar district of Maharashtra. J Vet Parasitol, 24:141-145.

 

Abstract Read : 572 Downloads : 90
Previous Next

Recommend IJLR to include in UGC-CARE list

Please recommend IJLR to include in UGC-CARE list

Download Completed format here

IJLR_UGC CARE Recommendation

And

Recommendations of new journals should be routed by universities and colleges as follows:

  1. Universities: IQAC cell to respective regional CARE University
  2. Affiliated colleges: College IQAC cell to parent university’s IQAC cell. Parent university IQAC cell will forward to respective regional CARE University.

You can find Zonal UGC-CARE address here https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/site/website/ugc-contact.aspx

Close