UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Comparative Efficacy of Two Different Synchronization Protocol in Postpartum Dairy Cows

Hirole P.D. Deshmukh S. G. Ingawale M.V. Kuralkar S. V. Thorat M. G. Ratnaparkhi A. R. Godbole P.V.
Vol 8(11), 283-290
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20171121115040

The study was undertaken to find out the efficacy of Ovsynch and Double PGF2α protocol in terms of estrus induction, time required for onset of induced estrus, duration of induced estrus and conception rate in postpartum dairy cows. Total twelve cows with 40-60 postpartum days from 2nd to 4th lactation were selected and divided into two groups comprising six cows in each group. In Group-I cows received Ovsynch protocol with 18 to 20 hrs. fixed TAI. In Group-II cows were treated with Double PGF2α protocol and inseminated after detected estrus. The first service conception rate was recorded on day 60 post insemination. The percent induced estrus response recorded in Ovsynch group was 83.33 and Double PGF2α group 100 percent, respectively. The time required for onset of induced estrus and duration of induced estrus observed in Ovsynch and Double PGF2α protocol was 53.20±1.8; 21.2±0.58 and 50.67±1.54; 21.33±0.49, respectively. The first service conception rate was 33.33 percent observed in Ovsynch and double PGF2α group, respectively. The percent induced estrus response was numerically higher in PGF2α group as compared to Ovsynch group whereas the first service conception rate in Ovsynch and double PGF2α group was at par.


Keywords : Conception Rate Double PGF2α Estrus Synchronization Ovsynch Postpartum

Most estrus synchronization programs in dairy cattle mainly involve the use of the luteolytic agent prostaglandin or analogues. A double prostaglandin protocol applied 11-14 days apart seems to be capable of bringing most cows to estrus. PGF2α controls life span of the corpus luteum, but cannot alter the course of follicular waves. Estrus will form due to changes at the developmental stage of preovulatory follicles during the post-injection period of PGF2α and the ensuing ovulation may take a week. Therefore, due to the continuation of a need for estrus detection in PGF2α applications, insemination time cannot be controlled (Twagiramungu et al., 1995; Pursley et al., 1997a; Pursley et al., 1997b; Guilbault et al., 1998). Ultimately, reproductive physiologists have developed methods that limit estrus observation where ovulation which named as “Ovsynch” (Pursley et al., 1995; Pursley et al., 1997b). This protocol is a successful method of synchronization that has been tried intensively in cows at lactation and positive results have been obtained. Cervical mucus is a visco-elastic secretion of constantly secreting mucus producing cells of endo-cervix (Glover, 1960) and acts as a mechanical barrier to prevent intruding organisms. Colour, appearance, pH and electrical conductivity along with other rheological properties like spin barkeit value, elasticity, viscosity and fern (arbonisation) pattern are the most important properties in relation to fertility (Pandey et al., 1983). The occurrence of crystallization is common to all types of mucus. But degree of crystallization or arbonisation pattern in cervical mucus is under the control of two ovarian hormones viz. estrogen and progesterone. The phenomenon of crystallization in cervical mucus progresses under the influence of estrogen whereas progesterone dimishes the formation of arbonisation pattern (Tsiligianni et al., 2001). Thus it can be quite useful in predicting the onset of estrus, different stages of estrus and ovulation time in cattle and buffaloes (Alena et al., 2008). Hence the present investigation was carried out to study the induced estrus response, time required for onset of induced estrus, duration of induced estrus and conception rate in Ovsynch and Double PGF2α group.

Material and Methods

The present study was conducted on 12 postpartum dairy cows from 40-60 days postpartum at Livestock Instructional Farm PDKV, Akola and Gorakshan Sanstha, Gorakshan road, Akola and Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Post Graduate Institute of Veterinary and Animal sciences, Akola, Maharashtra. All these cows had good body condition score, normal genitalia and cyclic cows from 2nd to 4th lactation. Heat detection was done by visual observations in the morning 7.00 a.m. and evening 6.00 p.m.

Treatment Procedure

The selected dairy cows were treated with injection Ivermectin @ 1 ml per 50 Kg body weight s/c (only once), injection vitamin AD3EH 5 ml I/M (5 days apart), injection sodium acid phosphate 40.3% w/v per ml@ 5 ml I/M(5 days apart), chelated mineral mixture 50 gm daily orally for 10 days. After initial treatment these cows were randomly divided into two groups comprising six cows.

 

 

Group I (Ovsynch)

Ovsynch protocol were carried out with administrating 10 ug of GnRH analogue (Buserlin acetate) at any stage of estrus cycle (day 0) followed by 500 ug Cloprostenol (day 7) and second GnRH inj. 48 hrs after PGF2α administration and fixed time A.I. done at 18 to 20 hrs post second GnRH administration.

Group II (Double PGF2α)

Cows were received two injections of PGF2α (500 µg Cloprostenol) 14 days apart and inseminated according to detected estrus.

The induced estrus response was calculated on the basis of number of cows responded (exhibited estrus symptoms) after PGF2α injection. The time required for estrus induction was calculated from time of PGF2α injection to first detection heat symptoms by visual observations and the duration of induced estrus was calculated from expression of first sign of behavioural symptoms of estrus to the cessation of behavioural symptoms of estrus. The estrual cervical mucus was collected from dairy cows who exhibited estrus and collected in petri dish before the insemination. The collected estrual cervical mucus was used to study the fern pattern, hydrogen ion concentration (pH) and spinbarkeit value. In fern pattern examination two to three drops of well mixed cervical mucus was spread uniformly over grease free glass slide and air dried. The air dried slide was examined under microscope using low power objective 10x for crystallization pattern of cervical mucus, known as arbonization pattern. The arbonization pattern of observed mucus was grouped as per Dodamani et al. (2010) into typical and atypical type of fern pattern. In Hydrogen ion examination the cervical mucus was determined by Himedia pH indicator papers with 0.5 range difference, immediately after collection. The change of colour of pH indicator paper was matched with standard colour, to determine hydrogen ion concentration (pH). In spinbarkeit value examination two to three drops of collected cervical mucus was taken on a grease free glass slide and another grease free glass slide was placed over it. The mucus was stretched between two slides by moving second slide away from first one, until mucus breaks. The distance between two slides just before the breakage of mucus, string was measured through a scale (cm scale).

Statistical Analysis

The data was analysed by unequal completely randomized design online software of Web Agri Star Package 2.0.

Results and Discussion

The number of cows responded to treatment in Ovsynch group was 5 out of 6 (83.33 %) within 65.5 postpartum days and 6 cows out of 6 exhibited estrus from double PGF2α group (100%) within 70.1 postpartum days (Table 1).

Table 1: Efficacy in term of induced estrus response with Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocol

S. No. Groups (n=6) Mean AI days Postpartum No. of cows treated (n=6) No. of cows exhibited estrus No. of cows responded (%)
1 Group-I (Ovsynch) 65.5 6 5 83.33
2 Group-II (Double PGF2α) 70.1 6 6 100

In the present study it was observed that the efficiency in terms of estrus response was higher in double PGF2α group as compare to Ovsynch group. The present findings for the induced estrus response in double PGF2α group are in accordance with Khamas et al. (2013) who observed 100% estrus response by using double PGF2α (cloprostenol 500 µg) injection 10 and 12 days apart and also reported 90.90% estrus response by using double PGF2α (Cloprostenol 500µg)  injection 11 days apart in Holstein heifers. Similarly, Sahatpure and Patil (2008) in crossbreed cows and Dherange (2000) in Red Kandhari cows reported 100% and 90% estrus response, respectively. The present findings for the induced estrus response in Ovsynch group (GI) is in accordance with Twagiramungu et al. (1992) who reported 85.20 % estrus response in beef cows, similarly, Sathiamoorthy and Subramanian (2003) and Ramkrishnan et al. (2012) also reported 80 and 83.33 percent estrus response in Gir cows, respectively which is in accordance with the present findings. All the cows who exhibited estrus are observed for time required for onset of estrus. The average time required for onset of estrus after last PGF2α injection observed in Ovsynch and double PGF2α were 53.20±1.8 and 50.67±1.54 hrs, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2: Mean time required for onset of induced estrus in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocol

Sr. No. Groups (n=6) No. of cows treated No. of  cows exhibited estrus Average time required for onset of estrus (hrs)
1 Group-I (Ovsynch) 6 5 53.20±1.8
2 Group-II ( Double PGF2α) 6 6 50.67±1.54

(Differences between means were found statistically non-significant)

In the present findings it was observed that mean time interval for onset of induced estrus show non-significant difference in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocols. The present findings of mean time interval for onset of induced estrus in Ovsynch group is in accordance with Sathiamoorthy et al. (2007) and Ahmed et al. (2016) who reported 56.40±8.40 hrs and 48.75±0.71 hrs average time interval for onset of estrus, respectively. The present findings of mean time interval for onset of induced estrus in double PGF2α group (GII) is in accordance with Sahatpure and Patil (2008) who recorded 54.40±2.60  and 55.58±3.28 hrs average time interval for onset of induced estrus in non-descript and crossbreed cows with double dose of PGF2α (lutalyse 25 mg) injection at 11 days apart. Also the cows who exhibited estrus observed for duration of induced estrus. The mean duration of   induced estrus recorded in Ovsynch and double PGF2α were 21.2±0.58 and 21.33±0.49 hrs, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3: Duration of induced estrus in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocol

Sr. No. Groups (n=6) No. of cows treated (n=6) No. of  cows exhibited estrus Duration of  estrus (hrs)
1 Group-I (Ovsynch) 6 5 21.2±0.58
2 Group-II ( Double PGF2α) 6 6 21.33±0.49

(Differences between means were found statistically non-significant)

There was no significant difference between the mean duration of estrus between the synchronized groups. The present findings for mean duration of estrus in Ovsynch group (GI) are in accordance with Sathiamoorthy and Subramanian (2003), Sathiamoorthy et al. (2007) and Ahmed et al. (2016) who reported 20.50±2.50, 18.40±2.60 and 21.083±0.78 hrs duration of estrus in cows, respectively. The present findings of mean duration of estrus in double PGF2α group (GII) are in accordance with Dherange (2000) in Red Kandhari cows, Patil and Pawshe (2011) who recorded 19.11±2.03 and 19.2±0.86 hrs duration of estrus in cows, respectively. In Ovsynch group, 5 cows was responded to last PGF2α injection but inseminate all the 6 cows in group as per fixed timed artificial insemination. The first service conception rate after 60 day of TAI was 33.33 % in Ovsynch and double PGF2α group (Table 4).

Table 4: The first service conception rate in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocol

S. No. Groups (n=6) No. of cows treated No. of cows responded No. of  cows conceived Conception rate (%)
1 Group-I (Ovsynch) 6 5 2 33.33
2 Group-II( Double PGF2α) 6 6 2 33.33

In the present study the first service conception rate in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocols was observed at par. The present findings for first service conception rate in Ovsynch group (GI) are in accordance with Moriera et al. (2001), Prajapati et al. (2015) and Peters and Pursley (2002) who recorded 34.4%, , 30% and 38.3% first service conception rate, respectively. In contrast, higher first service conception rate was reported by Ramkrishnan et al. (2012) and Dhami et al. (2015) who reported 50 percent in Gir and crossbreed anestrus cows, respectively. Whereas, lower first service conception rate (16.66%) reported by Naikoo et al. (2016) in Kankrej cows. The present findings for first service conception rate in double PGF2α are in accordance with Hassan et al. (2017) who reported 31% first service conception rate, respectively. The higher first service conception rate than present findings of double PGF2α group recorded by Venkataramana et al. (2013) who reported 67 percent first service conception rate in Ongole cows. The discrepancy in first service conception rate in present study with the earlier findings of various research workers might be due to variation in reproductive status of animal, breed, different feeding patterns, method of estrus detection and molecule of prostaglandin used. The cervical mucus attributes like the hydrogen ion concentration (pH), spinbarkeit value and fern pattern was carried out during the present study at the time of estrus to evaluate the cervical mucus attributes parameters (Table 5).

Table 5: The cervical attributes in postpartum dairy cows

Sr. No. No. of Cows Cervical Attributes
pH Spinbarkeit Value (cm) Fern Pattern (%)
Typical Atypical
1 20 7.5±0.19 12.45±0.35 80 20

In the present study, the mean pH, Spinbarkeit value during estrus observed were 7.5±0.19 and 12.45±0.35 cm, respectively. Similarly the type of fern pattern were observed 80% (16/20) typical and 20% (4/20) atypical fern pattern. The present findings of mean pH value on day of estrus are in accordance with Gupta et al. (1981), Rao and Rao (1982), Malik et al. (2013) and Bhat et al. (2015) who reported 7.8±3.60, 7.93, 7.35±0.16 and 7.48±0.09, respectively in normal cyclic cows. The present findings of mean spinbarkeit value of cervical mucus are in accordance with Pattabiraman et al. (1967) and Modi et al. (2011) who reported 14 and 15.03±0.51 cm mean spinbarkeit value, respectively in healthy cyclic cows. The present findings for type of fern pattern of cervical mucus are in accordance with Rao and Rao (1982) reported 85.37% (typical) fern pattern in crossbreed heifers. Similarly Adhalikar et al. (1986) reported 75.5% (typical) fern pattern in ovulated crossbreed cows.

Conclusion

It was conclude that the percent induced estrus response was numerically higher in double PGF2α group as compared to Ovsynch. There was no significant difference in mean time interval for onset of induced estrus and mean duration of induced estrus between the synchronized groups.The first service conception rate in Ovsynch and double PGF2α protocols was observed at par. The mean values of pH and spinbarkeit were observed in normal range for optimum fertility.

Acknowledgement

We thank to Livestock Instructional Farm PDKV, Akola and Gorakshan Sanstha, Gorakshan road, Akola, Maharashtra for their kind permission, help and co-operation extended for taking up this work on their animals. We also express our deeply thanks to Dr. Sanjay Awghate, Regional Manager, Virbac Animal Health India, Private Limited, Mumbai for providing all help needed.

 

 

 

References

  1. Adhallikar VP.(1986).Studies on cervico-vaginal mucus physico-chemical properties of cross-bred cows at mid-oestrus for prediction of ovulation and fertility.:Indian J. Anim. Repro. 7(1), 152.
  2. Ahmed N,Kathiresan D, Ahmed FA, Lalrintluanga K, Mayengbam P and Gali JM .(2016). Pattern of induced estrus and conception rate following Ovsynch and Ovsynch based gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatments initiated on day 6 of estrus cycle in repeat breeding crossbreed cows: Veterinary World. 9(4), 342-345.
  3. Alena J, Ludek S, Mojmir V and Franstisek L. (2008). Factor affecting the cervical mucus crystallization, the sperm survival in cervical mucus and pregnancy rate in Holstein cows. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 9(2), 377-384.
  4. Bhat FA, Bhattacharyya HK, Fazili MR, Hussain SA and Khan MZ(.2015). Studies on estrual cervical mucus of repeat breeding cows with special reference to ovulatory disturbances and genital infection: Theriogenology Insight. 5(2), 113-123.
  5. Dhami A. J., Nakrani B. B., Hadiya KK, Patel JA and Shah RG.(2015). Comparative efficacy of different estrus synchronization protocols on estrus induction response, fertility and plasma progesterone and biochemical profile in crossbred anestrus cows: Veterinary World 8(11), 1310-1316.
  6. Dherange NP. (2000). Efficacy of PGF2a in treatment of postpartum suboestrus in Red Kandhari cows. M.V.Sc. Thesis submitted to M. A. U. Parbhani.
  7. Dodamani MS, Mohteshamuddin K, Awati SD, Tandle MK and. Honnappagol SS. (2010). Evaluation of pre and post artificial insemination effect of GnRH hormone on conception of repeat breeder Deoni cows: Veterinary World. 3(2), 209-211.
  8. Glover FA. (1960). The effect of ovarian hormone administration on the consistence of cervical secretion in the cow: J. Reprod. Fertil. 1,110-111.
  9. Guilbauilt LA, Pothier F, Twagiramunga H and Sirard MA. (1998). New technologies to improve the reproductive efficiency of dairy cattle: Can J. Anim. Sci. 78,113-129.
  10. Gupta KC, Vyas KK, Pareek PK and Dwaraknath PK. (1981). Note on sperm and cervical mucus incompatibility in repeat-breeding cows: Indian J. Anim. Sci. 51(10), 981.
  11. Hassan M, Husnain A, Naveed MI, Raiz U and Ahmad N. (2017). Effect of Ovsynch versus prostaglandin Fprotocol on estrus response, ovulation rate, timing of ovulation and pregnancy per artificial insemination in Sahiwal cows: Animal Sci. J. 88,445-450
  12. Khamas DJ, al-Hamedawi TM and Al-Jeburii KO. (2013). The effect of using different periods of estrus synchronization on the reproductive performance and subsequent haematological value before and during pregnancy in Holstein heifers: International J. Sci. and Nature. 4(1), 63-67.
  13. Malik I, Sharma U, Kumar S and Sharad K. (2013). Studies on physical properties of cervical mucus of repeat breeding crossbreed cows: Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction. 34(2), 6-8.
  14. Modi LC, Suthar BN, Nakhashi HC, Sharma VK and Panchasara HH. (2011). Physical characteristics of estrual cervical mucus and conception rate in repeat breeder Kankrej: IJAVMS. 5(4), 416-423.
  15. Moreira F, Orlandi C, Risco CA, Mattos R, Lopes F and Thatcher WW. (2001). Effect of Presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows: J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1646-1659.
  16. Naikoo M, Dhami AJ and Ramakrishnan A.(2016). Effect of estrus synchronization on plasma progesterone pofile and fertility response in postpartum suckled anestrus Kankrej cow: Indian J. Anim. Res. 50(4), 460-465.
  17. Pandey SK, Pandit RK and Chaudhary RA. (1983). Repeat breeding cows in relation to physical characteristics of cervical mucus, fertility and treatment: Indian Vet. J. 60(12), 946-947
  18. Pattabiraman SR, Venkataswamy V and Thangaraj TM. (1967). Physicochemical properties of oestrual mucus of cows: Indian Vet J. 44(5), 413-417.
  19. Patil SR. and Pawshe CH. (2011). Estrus induction and fertility following single dose of PGF2α in crossbreed cows and heifers: Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction. 32 (2).
  20. Peters MW and Pursley JR. (2002). Fertility of lactating dairy cows treated with Ovsynch after presynchronization injections of PGF2α and GnRH: J Dairy Sci. 85(9), 2403-2406.
  21. Prajapati KA, Sharma PK and Choudhry MK. (2015). Management of repeat breeding under field condition using Ovsynch protocol in cross bred cows.:J. KrishiVighyan. 4(1), 60-62.
  22. Pursley JR, Meeand MO and Wiltbank MC. (1995). Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH: Theriogenology. 44,915-923.
  23. Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC, Stevenson JS, Ottobre JS, Garverick HA and Anderson LL.(1997a). Pregnancy rates cows and heifers ineminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus: J. Dairy Sci. 80, 295-300.
  24. Pursley JR, Kosorok MR and Wiltbank MC. (1997b). Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation: J. Dairy sci. 80,301-306.
  25. Ramkrishnan A, Dhami AJ, Naikoo M, Parmar BC and Divekar BS. (2012). Estrus induction and fertility response in postpartum anestrus Gir cows: Indian J. Anim. Reproduction. 33(1).
  26. Rao SV and Rao AR. (1982). Characteristics of oestrual mucus and cytology of vaginal epithelium of cross-bred heifers: Indian Vet. J. 59, 400-401.
  27. Sahatpure SK and Patil MS. (2008). Synchronization of estrus with prostaglandin Fanalogue in non-decript cow.:Vet. World 1(7), 203-204.
  28. Sathiamoorthy T and Subramanian A. (2003). Effect of GnRH and PGF2α combination on fixed time breeding and fertility in dairy cows: Indian Vet. J. 80, 543-546.
  29. Sathiamoorthy T, Parthasarathy R and Kathirchelvan M. (2007). Estrus response and fertility rate in PGF2α, CIDR and Ovsynch treated cow: Indian Vet. J. 84,600-602.
  30. Tsiligianni T, Karagiannidis A, Brikas P and Saratsis P. (2001). Physical properties of bovine cervical mucus during normal and induced (progesterone and/or PGF2α) estrus: Theriogenology. 55, 629-640.
  31. Twagiramungu H, Guilbault LA, Proulx J, Villeneuve P, and Dufour JJ. (1992). Influence of an agonist of gonadotropin-releasinghormone (Buserelin) on estrus synchronization and fertility in beef cows: J. Anim. Sci. 70, 1904–1910.
  32. Twagiramunga H, Guilbult LA and Dufour JJ. (1995). Synchronization of ovarian follicular waves with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to increase the precision of estrus in cattle: A Review. J. Anim. Sci.73, 3141:3151.
  33. Venkataramana KK, Sadasiva Rao, Supriya K and Rajanna N. (2013). Effect of prostaglandin on estrus response and conception rate in lactating Ongole cows: Vet. World. 6(7), 413-415.
Full Text Read : 2305 Downloads : 439
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close