NAAS Score 2020

                   5.36

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Effect of Clinical Mastitis on the Milk Yield in Dairy Cows in India

Yogesh C. Bangar Med Ram Verma Vijay Bahadur Sharma
Vol 8(8), 171-177
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180104021459

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of clinical mastitis along with associated factors on milk yield in dairy cows in India by collecting the data from three organized cattle farms for the period of 2012-13. The overall prevalence of mastitis in dairy cows was observed as 29.27 %. The results of paired t test showed the significant reduction in daily milk yield after the occurrence of mastitis. The results of general linear model showed that the overall daily mean reduction in milk after the occurrence of mastitis was observed as 1.64 kg. The crossbred cows (2.37 kg/day) and aged cows (2.09 kg/day) showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher reduction in milk yield due to mastitis than their indigenous (0.91 kg/day) and young lactating cows (1.19 kg/day), respectively. The longer duration of mastitis was found to be associated with higher milk losses in dairy cows.


Keywords : Breed Cow General Linear Model Mastitis Milk Yield Season

Mastitis is characterized by physical, chemical and bacteriological changes in the milk and pathological changes in the glandular tissue of the udder (Radostits et al., 2000). Mastitis is costly disease in dairy farms because of it causes heavy economic losses by reducing milk production (Biffa et al., 2005) and ultimately affect the economy of the country. Annual losses in the dairy industry due to mastitis was approximately 2 billion dollars in USA and 526 million dollars in India (Varshney and Naresh, 2004). The prevalence of clinical mastitis in crossbred cows ranges between 5 to 37 % (Bangar et al., 2016) and it is associated with many animal-level and environmental-level factors (Van den Borne et al., 2010).

Mastitis commonly occurs in cows with high milk production and has a long lasting effect on milk yield. The cow once affected with mastitis never reached to pre-mastitis milk yield and produces less milk throughout the rest of lactation (Lescourret and Coulon, 1994). Several studies stated that clinical mastitis has a detrimental effect on milk yield and various factors are associated with milk loss in lactating cows (Bartlett et al., 1991; Houben et al., 1993; Grohn et al., 2004). Since the losses due to mastitis may varied from farm to farm and also may depends upon various cow-level and environmental factors, the combined statistical analysis is necessary to study the effect of mastitis on milk yield in cows across farms. Furthermore, the study of temporary fluctuation in milk yield due to mastitis, which is limited to the duration of the disease rather than whole lactation yield have special importance to examine the immediate losses due to mastitis. Duration-specific analysis of milk losses due to mastitis can avoid the overlapping of the effects of other diseases on milk yield in same lactation in dairy cows.

Therefore, the present study was carried out to study prevalence of clinical mastitis and to study effect of mastitis along with various factors on milk yield, using data of daily milk yields in dairy cows maintained at three organized cattle farms in India.

Material and Methods

Details of Farms

The data on mastitis in dairy cows were collected from three organized cattle farms from different geographical locations of India. The details of three cattle farms are as follows:

  1. Cattle & Buffalo farm, LPM Section, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh),
  2. RCDP on cattle, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Rahuri (Maharashtra) and
  3. Livestock Research Center, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal (Haryana).

The managemental practices at three farms were almost same. The reference period for the study was 2012 to 2013.

Data Variables

The data on clinical mastitis in dairy cows were collected from animal history sheets, disease register and daily milk yield registers from three cattle farms. The breed of dairy cows reared at three farms was classified in to two categories i.e. crossbred and indigenous. The age at calving for each cow was recorded in years and then converted in to two categories i.e. less 5 years ( < 5 yrs) and 5 and above (≥ 5 yrs). The season in which mastitis occurred was classified into three categories as summer (March-June), rainy (July-October) and winter (November-February). The stage of lactation was considered as early (0-3 months), mid (3-6 months) and late (6-9 months). The duration of mastitis infection was classified as up to 5 days (≤ 5), 6 to 10 days and above 10 days (> 10). Daily milk yield in cows was obtained from one week prior to diagnosis of mastitis to last day of the duration of mastitis. The reduction in milk yield (kg/day) for each cow was calculated by subtracting mean milk yield (kg/day) during the period of mastitis from mean milk yield (kg/day) of week before the diagnosis of mastitis. The incomplete milk records were excluded in the analysis.

Statistical Analysis

The descriptive analysis was done to examine the preliminary details of lactating cows and prevalence of mastitis at three cattle farms. The association of mastitis with breed, age group and parity at three farms was studied using Chi-square test. The effect of mastitis on milk yield by using daily milk yield before and after occurrence of mastitis was determined by using Paired t test. The other factors were also studied to examine their influence in milk reduction in mastitic cows. For this purpose, the data on milk reduction in the affected cows were used as dependent variable and fixed effects of farm (3 levels), breed (2 levels), age (2 levels), parity (2 levels), season (3 levels), stage of lactation (3 levels) and duration of disease (3 levels) considered as independent variables. The effects of various factors on reduction in milk yield (kg/day) in mastitic cows were evaluated using by a general linear model as follows:

Where,  represent the mean daily milk reduction (kg) due to mastitis in oth cow at ith farm;  represent overall mean; Fi, Bj, Ak, Pl, Sm, Ln, Do represent fixed effects of farm, breed, age group, parity, season of occurrence of mastitis, stage of lactation and duration category; and  is distributed normally with mean, 0 and variance, . All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software version 16.0.

Results and Discussion

The distribution of lactating cows along with prevalence of mastitis is given in Table 1.

Table 1: Prevalence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows at organized farms (2012-13)

Factor IVRI Farm MPKV Farm NDRI Farm
  Total Affected (%) Total Affected (%) Total Affected (%)
Overall 248 71 ( 28.63) 172 60 ( 34.88) 458 126 (27.51)
Breed * NS NS
  Crossbred 196 62 ( 31.63) 155 55 (35.48) 263 76 ( 28.90)
  Indigenous 52 09 ( 17.31) 17 05 ( 29.41) 195 50 ( 25.64)
Age ** NS **
  < 5 yrs 173 41 ( 23.70) 82 25 ( 30.49) 216 45 ( 20.83)
   ≥ 5 yrs 75 30 ( 40.00) 90 35 ( 38.89) 242 81 ( 33.47)
Parity ** * *
  Primiparous 110 18 ( 16.36) 50 11 ( 22.00) 135 28 ( 20.74)
  Multiparous 138 53 ( 38.41) 122 49 ( 40.16) 323 98 ( 30.34)

* Significant at 5 % level; ** Significant at 5 % level; NS-Non-significant

The overall prevalence of mastitis in dairy cows at three farms was observed as 29.27% (257/878). Overall prevalence of clinical mastitis was observed as 28.63% (71/248), 34.88% (60/172) and 27.51% (126/458) at IVRI farm, MPKV farm and NDRI farm, respectively. The chi-square analysis showed that the overall prevalence of clinical mastitis was not significant (p > 0.05) among farms. The results of overall prevalence are in accordance of findings reported by Jingar et al. (2014).

The prevalence of mastitis in crossbreds was higher than indigenous cows at three farms. However, chi-square analysis revealed significant (p < 0.05) association between mastitis prevalence and breeds only for IVRI farm. At MPKV and NDRI farm, prevalence of mastitis in both breeds was not statistically (p>0.05) different. In age-wise analysis, the prevalence of mastitis in cows with age less than 5 yrs was significantly lower at IVRI and NDRI farm than that of cows with age above than 5 yrs. The prevalence of mastitis was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in multiparous cows (ranged between 30.34 to 40.16 %) at three farms than in primiparous cows (ranged between 16.36 to 22.00%). The descriptive statistics of milk yield before and after incidence of mastitis is given in Table 2. There was significant (p < 0.05) reduction in milk yield after the incidence of mastitis at each farm. The overall milk yield due to mastitis was reduced from 10.37 kg to 8.01 kg. The significant reduction in milk yield after incidence of mastitis in dairy cows were also reported earlier (Firat 1993; Rajala and Grohn, 1998).

Table 2: Effect of mastitis on milk yield (kg/day) in dairy cows at three farms (2012-13)

Farm Number of Affected cows Mean milk yield (kg) before incidence Mean milk yield (kg) after incidence Paired t p value
IVRI 55 8.23 ± 0.50 6.47 ± 0.46 14.18 < 0.001
MPKV 39 10.75 ± 0.77 8.54 ± 0.72 6.96 < 0.001
NDRI 75 11.75 ± 0.64 8.86 ± 0.61 10.5 < 0.001
Total 169 10.37 ± 0.38 8.01 ± 0.36 15.55 < 0.001

The effects of various cow-level and environmental factors on daily reduction in milk yield (kg) are presented in Table 3. Mean daily reduction in milk yield (kg) was observed as 1.64 ± 0.22 kg. Rajala-Schultz et al. (1999) reported that the daily loss due to mastitis varied 1.0 to 2.5 kg in Finnish Ayrshire cows. In another study, Hortet and Seegers (1998) reported that average daily milk loss due to mastitis varied 0 to 3 kg. The farm had significant (p < 0.05) effect on mean daily reduction in milk in mastitic cows. The highest reduction in milk yield (kg/day) was observed at NDRI farm (2.46 ± 0.25 kg) followed by MPKV (1.25 ± 0.36 kg) and IVRI farm (1.20 ± 0.30 kg). The mean daily reduction in milk yield was higher in crossbred cows (2.37 ± 0.22 kg) than in indigenous cows (0.91 ± 0.33 kg). Higher milk losses in crossbred cows as compared to indigenous cows were also reported by Kumar et al., (2010). The high losses in crossbred cows may relate to high milk production. Additionally, crossbred cows are more susceptible to intra-mammary infection as compared to indigenous cows (Slettbakk et al., 1995; Radostits et al., 2000; Sharma and Maiti, 2010).

Table 3: Least-square estimates of milk reduction (kg/day) in mastitis affected cows due to various factors at organized farms (2012-13)

Factors Level N Mean Effect Std. Error
Grand Mean   169 1.64 0.22
Farm IVRI 55 1.20a 0.3
MPKV 39 1.25a 0.36
NDRI 75 2.46b 0.25
Breed Crossbred 135 2.37b 0.22
Indigenous 34 0.91a 0.33
Age (years) < 5 years 68 2.09b 0.25
≥ 5 years 101 1.19a 0.31
Parity Primiparous 29 1.34 0.38
Multiparous 140 1.93 0.21
Season of Incidence Summer 77 1.9 0.27
Rainy 51 1.26 0.31
Winter 41 1.76 0.32
Stage of Lactation Early 63 1.84 0.27
Mid 42 1.18 0.35
Late 64 1.9 0.28
Duration of Disease (days)

 

≤ 5 days 72 1.44a 0.28
6 to 10 days 51 1.19a 0.32
> 10 days 46 2.29b 0.31

Means bearing different superscripts (a, b) among levels for each factor differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Similarly, the age of mastitic cows was significantly associated with mean daily milk reduction (kg) and it was revealed that it was higher in cows with age above 5 years (2.09 ± 0.25 kg) than their counterparts (1.19 ± 0.31 kg). The parity and stage of lactation did not significantly affect the milk yield in mastitic cows. Additionally, season of disease occurrence did not differ the milk yield in mastitic cows. The duration of disease was studied to find impact of it on milk yield in cows and it was revealed that milk yield was extensively affected due to course of disease. The longer duration of disease caused higher mean daily reduction in milk yield in dairy cows. The cows with mastitis more than 10 days (2.29 ± 0.31 kg) had significantly (p < 0.05) higher mean daily reduction in milk yield other cows. The duration of mastitis of up to 5 or 10 days were at par in term of reduction in milk yield.

The estimates of milk losses from the present study indicate importance of prevention and control of mastitis at farm and field level. The high losses in dairy cows can be reduced by improving managemental and therapeutic measures (Petrovski et al., 2006; Rahman et al., 2009; Bangar et al., 2015).

 

Conclusion

The clinical mastitis causes huge reduction in milk yield in dairy cows. Furthermore, the crossbred cows had more losses in milk yield as compared to the indigenous cows which indicate that the losses may depends upon level of milk production. Higher milk losses due to mastitis were associated longer duration of disease. The study of the impact of clinical mastitis in dairy cows using the data from several locations provides the guidelines for monitoring the health status of productive animals and implementation of programs for prevention and control of this disease.

Acknowledgement

The authors are highly thankful to Director of Research, I.V.R.I., Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh); Director of Research, M.P.K.V., Rahuri, (Maharashtra) and Joint Director (Research), N.D.R.I., Karnal (Haryana) for permission to use data on mastitis from the cattle farms of their institutes/university. The authors also express their gratitude to the learned referee and the Editor-in- Chief for their valuable comments on the original version of the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Bangar YC, Singh B, Dohare AK and Verma MR. 2015. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in India, Tropical Animal Health Production. 47 (2):291-297.
  2. Bangar, YC, Verma MR, Dohare AK and Mukherjee R. 2016. Meta-analysis of Prevalence of Clinical Mastitis in Crossbred Cows in India (1995-2014) Journal of Animal Research. 6(6):933-938.
  3. Bartlett PC, Van Wijk J, Wilson DJ, Green CD, Miller GY, Majewski GY and Heider LE. 1991. Temporal patterns of lost milk production following clinical mastitis in large Michigan Holstein herd. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(5):1561-1572.
  4. Biffa D, Debela E and Beyene F. 2005. Prevalence and risk factors of mastitis in lactating dairy cows in Southern Ethiopia. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine. 3(3): 189-198.
  5. Firat MZ. 1993. An investigation into the effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science. 36:311-321.
  6. Grohn YT, Wilson DJ, Gonzalez RN, Hertl JA, Schulte H, Bennett G and Schukken YH. 2004. Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 87(10):3358-3374.
  7. Hortet P and Seegers H. 1998. Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 37: 1–20.
  8. Houben EHP, Dijkhuizen AA, van Arendonk JAM and Huirne RBM. 1993. Short- and long-term production losses and repeatability of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 76(9):2561–2578.
  9. Jingar SC, Mehla RK, Singh M and Singh PK. 2014. Effect of stages and level of milk production on mastitis incidence in cows and murrah buffaloes. Journal of Bio Innovation. 3(3):117-123.
  10. Kumar GSN, Apannavar MM, Surnagi MD and Kotresh AM. 2010. Study on incidence and economics of clinical mastitis. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science. 23(2):407-408.
  11. Lescourret F and Coulon JB. 1994. Modelling the impact of mastitis on milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 77(8):2289-2301.
  12. Petrovski KR, Trajcev M and Buneski G. 2006. A review of the factors affecting the costs of bovine mastitis. Journal of South African veterinary Association. 77(2): 52–60.
  13. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Blood DC and Hinchkliff KW. 2000. A Text Book of Veterinary Medicine. 9th Ed. W.B. Saunders, New York.
  14. Rahman MA, Bhuiyan MMU, Kamal MM and Shamsuddin M. 2009. Prevalence and risk factors of mastitis in dairy cows. Bangladesh Veterinarian. 26(2):54-60.
  15. Rajala PJ and Grohn YT. 1998. Disease occurrence and risk factor analysis in Finnish Ayrshire cows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 39(1):1-13.
  16. Rajala-Schultz PJ, Grohn YT, McCulloch CE and Guard CL. 1999. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82(6):1213-1220.
  17. Sharma N and Maiti SK. 2010. Incidence, etiology and antibiogram of subclinical mastitis in cows in durg, Chhattisgarh. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research. 19:45-54.
  18. Slettbakk T, Jorstad A, Farver TB and Holmes JC. 1995. Impact of milking characteristics and morphology of udder and teats on clinical mastitis in first and second lactation in Norwegian cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 24:235–244.
  19. Van den Borne BH, van Schaik G, Lam TJ and Nielen M. 2010. Variation in herd level mastitis indicators between primi- and multiparae in Dutch dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 96(1-2):49-55.
  20. Varshney JP and Naresh R. 2004. Evaluation of a homeopathic complex in the clinical management of udder diseases of riverine buffaloes. Homeopathy. 93(1): 17-20.
Full Text Read : 1967 Downloads : 314
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close