B. K. Swain P. K. Naik S. K. Sahoo S. K. Mishra Dhirendra Kumar Vol 8(8), 248-253 DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180117114123
A study was conducted to see the effect of feeding of fresh azolla (Azolla pinnata) on the performance of White Pekin laying ducks (60 no., 56 weeks) divided into three groups (each group had four replicates with five laying ducks per replicate) and were randomly fed three diets i.e. T1-control diet (Standard duck layer diet(SDLD)), T2 (SDLD reduced by 10% + fresh azolla @ 100g/duck/day) and T3(SDLD reduced by 20% + fresh azolla @ 200g/duck/day). The azolla contained 4.74 % dry matter (DM); 24.93% crude protein (CP); 3.48% ether extract (EE); 13.80% crude fibre (CF), 16.84% total ash (TA) and 40.95 % nitrogen free extract (NFE). Egg production and egg weight increased significantly (P<0.05) due to the feeding of Azolla at both the levels. The feed consumption was significantly (P<0.05) higher for T2 group. The feed conversion ratio (FCR), performance efficiency index and shape index of eggs were significantly (P<0.01) improved for the azolla fed ducks. The egg quality characteristics viz. haugh unit score, albumen index, yolk index and shell thickness with or without shell membrane (mm) were similar for both control and azolla fed ducks. The yolk colour of ducks fed azolla was deep orange compared to the control group. It can be concluded that feeding of fresh azolla @ 200g/duck/day as replacement of 20 % of concentrate feed in White Pekin Laying ducks was beneficial in terms of improved FCR, performance efficiency index, egg production, egg weight with better shape index of eggs and enriched yolk colour.
Keywords : Azolla Egg quality Production Performance White Pekin Laying Ducks
India ranks second in world, with a total duck population of around 23.5 millions according to the livestock census of India, 2012. Duck egg and meat are preferred by people next to chicken and has demand in market. Productivity in tropics has been limited by scarcity and consequent high prices of the conventional protein sources which are limiting factors for poultry feed production (Atawodi et al., 2008). Hence, there is a need to search for alternate protein sources for use as feed supplement for sustainable poultry production.
The search for alternative feed resource led the scientist to find a wonderful plant Azolla, which holds the promise of providing a sustainable feed for livestock and poultry. Azolla is a floating fern and belongs to the family of Azollacea. Azolla hosts a symbiotic blue green algae Anabaena azollae, which is responsible for the fixation and assimilation of atmospheric nitrogen. Azolla in turn provides a carbon source and favourable environment for the growth and development of the algae. In this unique symbiotic relationship that makes Azolla, a wonderful plant with high protein content. Azolla (Azolla pinnata) is a very good source of protein, amino acids, vitamins (A, B12 and β-carotene), growth promoter and intermediaries and minerals like calcium, phosphorous, potassium, ferrous, copper, manganese etc. On dry weight basis azolla contains 25-35 % crude protein (CP), 5-15 % minerals and 7-10 % amino acids. Carbohydrate and fat % are very low. It is easily digestible due to low lignin content. Azolla contains good amount of amino acids i.e. lysine, 1.51 %, Meth+Cys, 0.97 % with a protein content of 23.4 % (Buckingham et al., 1978). In comparison to other conventional fodders like hybrid napier, lucerne, sorghum, Azolla produces higher quantity of biomass of about 730 t/ha (Pillai et al., 2002). Keeping in view, its chemical composition, ease of biomass production and potential nutritional value in birds, present study was planned to study the effect of feeding of fresh azolla (Azolla pinnata) as a direct feed supplement replacing a portion of standard duck layer diet on the performance of White Pekin laying ducks.
Materials and Methods
Fresh azolla was produced in the azolla cultivation unit (in silpauline pit) of the research centre. Sixty White Pekin laying ducks (56 weeks) were divided into three groups (each group had four replicates with five laying ducks per replicate) and were randomly fed three diets i.e. T1-control diet (Standard duck layer diet(SDLD)), T2 (SDLD reduced by 10% + fresh Azolla @ 100g/duck/day) and T3 (SDLD reduced by 20% + fresh azolla @ 200g/duck/day). All the birds were reared on deep litter system during the experimental period of 56 days. Standard management practices were followed and clean drinking water was made available ad lib. throughout the experiment. The weekly feed intake, daily egg production and egg weight were recorded. The egg quality parameters viz. shape index, albumen index, yolk index, haugh unit, albumen%, yolk%, shell%, and shell thickness were recorded once in a week. The feed cost to produce dozen egg and feed cost per duck per day were calculated. The proximate composition of Azolla and standard duck layer diet was analyzed (AOAC, 2005). The data pertaining to various parameters were analysed (Snedecor and Cochran, 1989). The means were tested for significant differences by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (Duncan, 1955).
Table 1: Ingredient and nutrient composition (%) of Standard duck layer diet and azolla
Ingredients, % | Standard Duck Layer Diet |
Wheat | 55 |
Soybean meal | 18 |
Deoiled rice bran | 7 |
Fish Meal | 7 |
DCP | 2 |
Oyster Shell | 10 |
Calcite | 1 |
Trace Min. | 0.5 |
Vitamin A,D,E,K | 0.015 |
Vitamin B-Complex | 0.015 |
DL-Methionine | 0.05 |
L-Lysine HCl | 0.05 |
Toxin Binder | 0.1 |
Choline Chloride | 0.1 |
Chemical Composition | ||
Analysed (%) | Diet | Azolla |
Crude Protein | 18.49 | 24.93 |
Ether Extract | 4.36 | 3.48 |
Crude fibre | 9.64 | 13.8 |
Total ash | 11.13 | 16.84 |
Nitrogen free extract | 56.38 | 40.95 |
Calculated (%) | ||
ME (Kcal/Kg), | 2500 | |
Calcium | 4.5 | |
Available Phosphorous | 0.39 | |
Lysine | 1.1 | |
Methionine | 0.4 |
Results and Discussion
Azolla contained 24.93 % crude proten (CP); 3.48 % ether extract (EE); 13.80 % crude fibre (CF) and 16.84% total ash (TA) and 40.95 % nitrogen free extract (NFE). Similar CP and EE contents were reported by earlier researchers (Parthasarathy et al., 2002). However, lower values of CP were reported by other workers (20.45%, Rathod et al., 2013; 21.17 %, Sujatha et al., 2013; 21.4%, Alalade and Iyayi , 2006; 21.66 %, Kavya et al., 2015; 21.80, Yadav and Chhipa, 2016 and 22.5 %, Ashraf et al., 2015). Higher values for CP were reported by earlier workers (25.40 %, Acharya et al., 2015; 25.42 %, Biswal et al., 2016; 25.64 %, Mishra et al., 2016;25.69 %, Saikia et al., 2014; 25.78%, Basak et al., 2002; 26.6 %, Katoch et al., 2017; 26.7 %, Becerra et al., 1995 and 28.24%, Indira et al., 2009). Significant (P<0.05) decrease in feed intake was observed in laying ducks fed diet given fresh azolla @ 200g/duck/day (T2) (Table 2). Similarly, Henry et al. (2015) observed that feeding of fresh azolla @30g/bird/day reduced the feed intake by 82.26g (533.47g) compared to control (618.73g) in turkey birds.
Table 2: Effect of feeding Azolla (Azolla pinnata) on performance of White Pekin layer ducks
Treatment | Egg Production (Dozen) | Feed Consumption (kg) | Feed conversion ratio | DDEP % | Performance Efficiency Index | Egg weight (g) |
T1 | 1.77c | 11.25a | 6.362a | 38.85a | 14.52a | 72.79b |
T2 | 2.26b | 11.75ab | 5.232b | 49.27b | 17.93b | 74.61a |
T3 | 2.61a | 11.11b | 4.277c | 56.91c | 22.12c | 74.79a |
SEM | 0.112 | 0.115 | 0.274 | 2.435 | 1.028 | 0.349 |
Means bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (P<0.05)
In contrast, non-significant differences in feed consumption was observed due to feeding of 5 and 10 % fresh azolla in white pekin broiler ducks compared to control (Acharya et al., 2015) and increase in feed consumption in local ducks fed fresh Azolla @100g/duck/day was reported by earlier workers (Sujatha et al., 2013). The egg production (dozen) and duck day egg production (DDEP) increased significantly due to supplementation of fresh azolla at both levels (both 100g and 200g/duck/day).
Table 3: Effect of feeding Azolla (Azolla pinnata) feeding on egg quality characteristics of White Pekin layer ducks
Treatment | Shape Index | Haugh Unit | Albumen index | Yolk index | Whole Egg contents (%) | Albumen (%) | Yolk (%) | Shell (%) | Shell thickness with membrane (mm) | Shell thickness without membrane (mm) |
T1 | 71.12b | 94.8 | 14.38 | 44.08 | 84.99 | 50.32 | 35.06 | 13.59 | 0.555 | 0.476 |
T2 | 71.38b | 96.43 | 14.3 | 44.71 | 85.17 | 50.42 | 35.3 | 13.49 | 0.551 | 0.46 |
T3 | 72.69a | 94.93 | 14.19 | 44.16 | 85.09 | 51.65 | 34.53 | 13.63 | 0.56 | 0.461 |
SEM | 0.292 | 0.352 | 0.073 | 0.206 | 0.205 | 0.341 | 0.242 | 0.101 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
However, Sujatha et al. (2013) observed similar values of percent duck day egg production for control (39.22 %) and azolla group (38.88 %) in a study conducted in non-descriptive local ducks in Andaman and Nicober Islands. Significant (P<0.05) improvement in feed conversion ratio was observed in laying ducks fed fresh azolla at both levels. In contrast, Lawas et al. (1998) noticed no significant difference in FCR between the laying ducks fed ad libitum azolla by replacing 50 % of control diet and those fed solely the control diet. Dhumal et al. (2009) and Balaji et al. (2009) observed non-significant difference in FCR of the broilers fed azolla at a level of 1-5 %. Biswal et al. (2016) also observed non-significant difference in FCR in broilers due to supplementation of azolla by replacing 5 and 10 % protein in isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets. The performance efficiency index increased significantly (P<0.05) due to feeding of fresh Azolla in white pekin ducks at both levels which might be due to better FCR, egg production and egg weight in azolla fed ducks. Egg weight (g) was increased significantly in ducks fed fresh azolla at both levels. However, (Sujatha et al., 2013) reported similar egg weight for both control and azolla fed ducks. The shape index increased significantly in ducks kept on T3 (200g fresh azolla/duck/day and egg quality parameters such as albumen index, yolk index, haugh unit score and shell thickness in ducks fed fresh azolla were similar in all the groups. The egg yolk of the laying ducks fed azolla was deep orange in color compared to the light yellow color of the egg yolk in the control ducks. The deep orange color of egg yolk in azolla fed ducks might be due to the presence of β-carotene pigments in azolla. Pillai et al. (2004) observed that azolla contains appreciable quantity of β-carotene, vitmin B12 and biopolymers.
In present study, feeding of fresh azolla @100g/duck/day and 200g/duck/day saved Rs1.03/egg and Rs2.52/egg on feed cost, respectively which might be due to better egg production and FCR in Azolla fed groups. Similarly, Sujatha et al. (2013) observed that there was a saving of Rs0.76/egg on feed cost due to feeding of fresh azolla @200g/duck/day which was due to reduction (30.73 %) in feed consumption in azolla supplemented group. Similar observation was also made in a previous study conducted by Sujatha et al. (2013) who reported a saving of Rs1/duck/day in feed cost due to feeding of fresh azolla.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that supplementation of fresh azolla (Azolla pinnata) @200g/duck/day by substituting 20 % of standard duck layer diet improved the egg production, egg weight, feed conversation ratio, performance efficiency index and shape index with enrichment of yolk colour.
References