Mahendra Gorakh Mote Yogesh Chandrakant Bangar1 Sangita Uddhav Bhoite Dilip Kundlik Deokar Vol 8(8), 142-150 DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170811034109
The data on pre-partum reproduction traits viz. age at first conception (AFCon) and age at first calving (AFC) of five groups of Gir crossbred (FG: 50% Holstein Friesian X 50% Gir, IFG:FG Interse, FJG: 50% Holstein Friesian X 25% Jersey X 25% Gir, IFJG: FJG Interse and R: 5/8 Gir) maintained at Research-cum-Development Project on cattle, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (M. P.K.V.), Rahuri Maharashtra (India) were collected from year 1972 to 2015. The effects of period of birth and season of birth on pre-partum reproductive traits were determined by using Harvey’s least-square technique. The overall least-squares means of AFCon in FG, IFG, FJG, IFJG and R group were 530.52 ± 8.35, 761.33 ± 10.66, 531.42 ± 6.60, 722.70 ± 8.64 and 798.06 ± 16.92 days, respectively. The overall least squares means of AFC in FG, IFG, FJG, IFJG and R genetic groups were 810.44 ± 8.41, 1040.64 ± 10.58, 809.88 ± 6.80, 1000.87 ± 8.69 and 1077.74 ± 17.17 days, respectively. The period of birth had significant effect on AFCon and AFC in IFG, FJG and IFJG genetic groups. The effect of season of birth on AFCon and AFC was non-significant in all the genetic groups.
Keywords : Age at First Conception Age at First Calving Gir Crossbreds Reproductive
India ranks first in milk production (146.3 million tonnes during 2014-15) by accounting for 18.5 per cent of world production (Anonymous, 2016). However, Indian dairy sector still faces the constraints of animals’ productivity and inferior reproduction performance. The productive and reproductive performance of an animal depends upon genetic makeup of animal and its interaction with the environment under which the animal is brought up and maintained in given time (Ekka et al., 2014). Additionally, pre-partum reproductive traits such as age at first conception or age at first calving in dairy cows plays very important in production cycle and thus, have high economic importance in farm profitability. An earlier age at first calving (AFC) can decrease rearing costs due to less feed, labour and managerial costs. Although, exotic cattle and their crosses are being used increasingly to raise milk production in hot climate of Indian subcontinent, it is extremely difficult to predict which breed, cross or generation will give highest economic returns over investment. This might be due to wide variation in productive and reproductive performance of crossbreds and adaptability of the crossbred to the divergent climatic conditions of the tropics (Patel and Dave, 1987). Hence, identification and stabilization of the optimum level of exotic inheritance is still moot point in the crossbreeding programme (Dalal et al., 1991). It is very essential to assess the comparative performance of crossbreds of various generations under divergent agro climatic environment for formulation and implementation of long term breeding programmes (Prabhukumar et al., 1990).
The aim of present study was to study the pre-partum reproductive performance in five genetic groups of Gir crossbreds by using data records of period from 1972 to 2015.
Materials and Methods
The present study was carried out to study two pre-partum traits viz. age at first conception (AFCon) and age at first calving (AFC). The data pertains to these pre-partum reproductive traits of five genetic groups of Gir crossbred (FG: 50% Holstein Friesian X 50% Gir, IFG:FG Interse, FJG: 50% Holstein Friesian X 25% jersey X 25% Gir, IFJG: FJG Interse and R: 5/8 Gir) were collected from Research Cum Development Project (RCDP) on cattle, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, for the period of 44 years from 1972 to 2015. The records of abnormal cases like abortion, dystokia, and still-births were not included. Similarly, half breds, Triple cross and 5/8 Gir crossbred cows which yielded less than 1500 kg milk in lactation or an lactation less than 200 days were not considered. The data for the period from 1972 to 2015 were classified according to period of birth. As per climatic condition the data of each year were divided into three seasons as S1 Rainy (June to September) S2 Winter (October to January) S3 Summer (February to May).
Statistical Methodology
The data were analysed with the help of two programmes Harvey (1990) and SAS version 9.3 (2013) available at Department of Statistics, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, (India). The means and standard error of the traits were calculated using General linear model PROC GLM (SAS 2013). Model for estimation of pre-partum reproductive traits:
The model for estimation of effects of period and season of birth on age at first conception and age at first calving was as given:
Where,
Yijk = Observations on age at first conception and age at first calving of kth animal born in ith period and jth season.
µ= Overall mean
Ai = Effect of ith period of birth (i=1, 2,……n)
Bj = Effect of jth season of birth (j=1, 2 and 3)
eijk = Random error associated with normally independently distributed with mean 0 and variance 62.
Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) as modified by Kramer (1957) was used to make pair wise comparison among the least-squares means.
Results and Discussion
Age at First Conception
The overall least-squares means of AFCon in FG, IFG, FJG, IFJG and R group were 530.52 ± 8.35, 761.33 ± 10.66, 531.42 ± 6.60, 722.70 ± 8.64 and 798.06 ± 16.92 days, respectively (Table 2). The lower AFCon was observed in cows of F1 generation (FG and FJG) than F2 generation (IFG and IFJG). This might be due to hetrotic effect in F1 and gene segregation effect in interse (F2).
Table 1: Analysis of variance of prepartum reproductive traits in Gir crossbreds as affected by various factors
Trait
Source of variation |
d. f. |
AFCon | AFC |
M.S.S. | M.S.S. | ||
FG | |||
Period of birth | 2 | 26498.49 | 27102.36 |
Season of birth | 2 | 9434.40 | 11815.47 |
Error | 162 | 11055.84 | 11215.14 |
IFG | |||
Period of birth | 4 | 319694.98** | 311088.02** |
Season of birth | 2 | 38772.83 | 37645.77 |
Error | 265 | 22209.90 | 21872.21 |
FJG | |||
Period of birth | 1 | 91961.32** | 77390.31** |
Season of birth | 2 | 676.13 | 202.20 |
Error | 112 | 4761.07 | 5051.17 |
IFJG | |||
Period of birth | 4 | 764322.37** | 750998.27** |
Season of birth | 2 | 27466.93 | 31196.83 |
Error | 375 | 21279.34 | 21521.09 |
R | |||
Period of birth | 2 | 50643.76 | 45841.29 |
Season of birth | 2 | 25090.26 | 24611.55 |
Error | 83 | 23264.70 | 23945.61 |
** = P<0.01
These results were in close agreement with Kamble (2015) reported in FG half bred and FJG triple cross. The lower AFCon than the present results was reported by Bhoite (1996) in JG, IFG and IFJG genetic groups. However, higher AFCon was noticed by Rafique et al. (2000) in HS halfbreds, Madhuri et al. (2009) in FJH and in IFJG genetic groups and Saha et al. (2010) in Karan Swiss. The period of birth had significant (P<0.01) influence on AFCon in IFG, FJG and IFJG groups (Table 1). Similar results were reported by Bhoite (1996) in Gir crossbreds, Rafique et al. (2000) in HF × Sahiwal crossbreds and Madhuri et al. (2009) in triple crossbred cows. Kamble (2015) reported significant effect in IFG and IFJG interbreds and non-significant in FG and FJG Gir crossbreds. The variations in AFCon might be due to influence of environmental factors. The variation due to season of birth in AFCon was non-significant in all the genetic groups (Table 1). These results were in agreement with Bhoite (1996) reported in FG, IFG, JG, FJG, IFJG, JFG, IJFG, BFG and IBFG genetic groups, Rafique et al. (2000) in HF × Sahiwal crossbred, Sattar et al. (2005) in Holstein Friesian, Madhuri et al. (2009) in Hariana triple cross cows and Kamble (2015) in FG, FJG, IFG and IFJG groups.
Though the differences due to season of birth were statistically non-significant the heifers of FG, FJG, IFJG and R genetic groups born during summer season had shorter AFCon than those born in rainy and winter season. The non-significant effect of season of birth on AFCon in all the groups revealed that they are efficient to tolerate seasonal changes. This might be due to fact that one of the parent in all crossbreds being indigenous might have contributed its inheritance for better adoption.
Age at First Calving
The overall least squares means of AFC in FG, IFG, FJG, IFJG and R genetic groups were 810.44 ± 8.41, 1040.64 ± 10.58, 809.88 ± 6.80, 1000.87 ± 8.69 and 1077.74 ± 17.17 days, respectively (Table 3).
These results were in accordance with Deokar (2003) reported in Gir crossbred, Jadhav (2011) in interse of FG and FJG and Shelar (2012) in 5/8 Gir triple cross (R). The lower AFC than the present results were reported by Garudkar (2015) in FJG triple cross and Jawale (2015) in 5/8 Gir triple cross (R). However, higher values of AFC were noticed by Sahana and Gurnani (2000) in HJT triple cross, Singh et al. (2002) in FH halfbred, Thombre et al. (2002) in HF x Deoni halfbred and Dahiya et al. (2003) in FH and FJH crossbreds. AFC was significantly (P<0.01) influenced by period of birth in IFG, FJG and IFJG genetic groups (Table 1). These results were in consonance with Dahiya et al. (2003) in Hariana crossbreds, Zol (2007) and Ambhore et al. (2016) in Phule Triveni, Jadhav (2009) in Gir crossbreds, Singh et al. (2011) in Vrindavani cows, Shelar (2012), Ekka et al. (2014) in Kankrej and Jawale (2015) in 5/8 Gir crossbred cows. However, results did not agreed with Sawant et al. (2006) in Khillar cows, Talape (2010) in Jersey crossbreds and Jadhav (2011) in FG halfbred.
Table 2: Least squares means of age at first conception (days) in Gir crossbreds
GG
Source of variation |
FG | IFG | FJG | IFJG | R | ||||||||||||
N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | ||||||||
Population mean
(µ)
|
167 | 530.52±8.35 | 272 | 761.33±10.66 | 116 | 531.42±6.60 | 382 | 722.70±8.64 | 88 | 798.06±16.92 | |||||||
Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | |||||||||||||
P1 : 1972-73 | 44 | 554.76±16.09 | 1980-86 | 76 | 698.20±17.12c | 1975-77 | 68 | 502.23±8.61b | 1977-83 | 109 | 653.31±13.98c | 1994-99 | 28 | 822.02±28.90 | |||
P2 : 1974-75 | 57 | 527.55±14.06 | 1987-93 | 59 | 719.40±19.48bc | 1978-80 | 48 | 560.61±10.05a | 1984-90 | 125 | 609.24±13.20d | 2000-05 | 34 | 826.64±26.99 | |||
P3 : 1976-77 | 66 | 509.25±12.97 | 1994-00 | 62 | 881.23±19.10a | – | 1991-97 | 70 | 767.32±17.47b | 2006 & above | 26 | 745.53±31.99 | |||||
P4
|
– | 2001-07 | 59 | 768.09±19.63b | – | 1998-04 | 50 | 873.86±20.65a | – | ||||||||
P5
|
– | 2008-15 | 16 | 739.71±37.52bc | – | 2005 & above | 28 | 709.75±27.60bc | – | ||||||||
Season of birth | Season of birth |
Season of birth
|
Season of birth | Season of birth | |||||||||||||
S1 : Rainy
|
60 | 541.32±13.59 | Rainy | 80 | 736.76±18.30 | Rainy | 29 | 530.90±12.81 | Rainy | 119 | 719.63±13.84 | Rainy | 20 | 781.96±34.83 | |||
S2 : Winter
|
61
|
535.45±13.48 | Winter | 100 | 768.46±15.70 | Winter | 45 | 535.67±10.66 | Winter | 149 | 738.45±12.93 | Winter | 36 | 831.19±26.21 | |||
S3 : Summer
|
46 | 514.79±15.97 | Summer | 92 | 778.76±16.39 | Summer | 42 | 527.69±10.64 | Summer | 114
|
710.01±14.41
|
Summer | 32
|
781.04±27.69
|
|||
Means under each class in the same column with different superscripts differed significantly
Table 3: Least squares means of age at first calving (days) in Gir crossbreds
GG
Source of variation |
FG | IFG | FJG | IFJG | R | |||||||||
N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | N | Mean±SE | |||||
Population mean
(µ) |
167 |
810.44±8.41 |
|
272 |
1040.64±10.58 |
116 |
809.88±6.80 |
382 |
1000.87±8.69 |
88 |
1077.74±17.17 |
|||
Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | Period of birth | ||||||||||
P1 : 1972-73 | 44 | 834.56±16.21 | 1980-86 | 76 | 980.22±16.99c | 1975-77 | 68 | 783.10±8.87b | 1977-83 | 109 | 931.34±14.06c | 1994-99 | 28 | 1101.18±29.32 |
P2 : 1974-75 | 57 | 808.23±14.16 | 1987-93 | 59 | 996.97±19.33bc | 1978-80 | 48 | 836.65±10.35a | 1984-90 | 125 | 889.82±13.28d | 2000-05 | 34 | 1104.35±27.39 |
P3 : 1976-77 | 66 | 788.54±13.06 | 1994-00 | 62 | 1159.27±18.95a | 1991-97 | 70 | 1045.84±17.57b | 2006 & above | 26 | 1027.69±32.46 | |||
P4
|
2001-07 | 59 | 1048.04±19.48b | 1998-04 | 50 | 1151.64±20.77a | ||||||||
P5
|
2008-15 | 16 | 1018.70±37.23bc | 2005 & above | 28 | 985.69±27.76bc | ||||||||
Season of birth | Season of birth | Season of birth | Season of birth | Season of birth | ||||||||||
S1 : Rainy
|
60 | 821.79±13.69 | Rainy
|
80 | 1016.63±18.16 | Rainy | 29 | 810.23±13.2 | Rainy | 119 | 999.01±13.91 | Rainy | 20 | 1061.06±35.33 |
S2 : Winter
|
61 | 816.92±13.57 | Winter
|
100 | 1046.98±15.58 | Winter | 45 | 811.88±10.98 | Winter | 149
|
1017.20±13.01 | Winter | 36 | 1110.62±26.59 |
S3 : Summer
|
46 | 792.61±16.08 | Summer | 92 | 1058.31±16.27 | Summer | 42 | 807.52±10.96 | Summer | 114 | 986.39±14.49 | Summer | 32 | 1061.54±28.09 |
Means under each class in the same column with different superscripts differed significantly
The variation due to season of birth in AFC was non-significant in all the genetic groups (Table 1). These results were in agreement with Sahana and Gurnani (2000) reported in Karan Fries cows, Dahiya (2003) in FH, JH, FJH and JFH genetic groups, Dubey and Singh (2005) in Sahiwal crossbred, Zol (2007) in Phule Triveni, Jadhav (2009) in Gir crossbred, Talape (2010) in Jersey crossbreds, Manoj et al. (2012) in Sahiwal, Shelar (2012) in 5/8 Gir (R) crossbred, Ekka et al. (2014) in Kankrej and Garudkar (2015) in FG, IFG, FJG and IFJG groups. Whereas, contradictory results were obtained by Dutt et al. (2002) in Hariana crossbreds, Varade (2002) in Jersey, Gaolao and Tharparkar cows, Ahmed et al. (2007) in HF x Zebu halfbreds, Hassan and Khan (2013) in Holstein crossbred cows and Kumar et al. (2016) in Ongole cow.
Although the effect of season of birth on AFC was non-significant, the lowest AFC was observed in heifers born during summer season (792.61 ± 16.08 days) in FG and rainy season (1016.63 ± 18.16 days) in IFG group. In FJG and IFJG group lowest AFC as 807.52 ± 10.96 days and 986.39 ± 14.49 days was observed in heifers born during summer season. In R group lowest AFC was noticed in heifers born in rainy season (1061.06 ± 35.33 days).
Conclusion
On the basis of results obtained from present study, it can be concluded that the FG half bred and FJG triple cross had better performance with respect to pre-partum reproduction traits over their Interse and 5/8 Gir crossbred. Period of birth had significant influence on both pre-partum traits of FJG and interse mated population of FG and FJG.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their sincere thanks to MPKV, Rahuri for providing the facilities for conducting the present investigation.
References