NAAS Score 2020

                   5.36

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Effects of Cumulative Protein Intake on Growth Performance and Body Conformation Traits in Female Broiler Breeders under Intensive System of Rearing

Susanta Kumar Naik Nrusingha Charan Behura Lipismita Samal Prasanna Kumar Mishra Rajakishora Swain Gangadhar Naik
Vol 7(9), 226-236
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170707051935

The present study evaluated the effects of protein intake on growth, nutrient utilization efficiency and body conformation traits in broilers. Three-hundred sixty (360) day-old chicks were distributed into 3 groups and offered starter diets containing 18, 19 or 20% protein up to 5th week. From each group, 96 pullets with higher body weight (BW) were selected and divided into high body weight (HB) and low body weight (LB) groups. The pullets of each BW group were distributed in 6 replicates. Three of the replicates were allotted to grower diets with 10 or 14% CP from 6-20 weeks. Pre-breeder and breeder diets were offered during 21-23 weeks and 24-50 weeks, respectively. For all groups, target 20th week BW was 2200g. Feed intake, BW and feed conversion efficiency were recorded. Body conformation traits were measured at 5th and 20th weeks. In conclusion, birds fed starter diet with 19% CP and grower diet with 14% CP had better body conformation, growth and feed efficiency.


Keywords : Broilers Crude Protein Intake Feed Efficiency Growth Performance Keel Length Shank Length

Introduction

Genetic improvement for rapid growth, feed efficiency and meat yield has resulted in changing the capacity of broiler birds and their requirements. Therefore, optimal nutrient requirements should be provided for best performance and economic viability. Feed cost represents ~70% of the total cost of intensive poultry production. Protein feeds are usually much more expensive than energy feeds and wasteful usage increases the cost of production. Moreover, excess protein feeding may increase elimination of nitrogenous compounds in faeces and urine, which has environmental implications. Therefore, economically as well as nutritionally it is imperative that balanced diets should be provided during the brooding, rearing and laying stages. Broiler breeder birds are fed on a controlled diet from 3-5 weeks onwards to attain a target body weight (BW) at 20 weeks of age. During restricted feeding, energy models are employed to predict the metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) intake taking the targeted BW gain into consideration. Furlan et al. (2004) reported that the feeding of high-protein diets to broilers was not recommended in tropical areas, because protein has the highest heat increment among dietary nutrients. Consequently, low-protein diets were recommended, to decrease the amount of heat produced and its harmful effects on bird’s performance. On the other hand, when low feed intake of heat-stressed birds is associated with low-protein content of diets, there is a reduction in amino-acid intake. The information on growth and body conformation traits of broilers is scanty which are also influenced by breed, strain, system of rearing and climatic conditions. With this backdrop, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effects of different levels of dietary CP during starter and grower phases on growth performance and body conformation traits in coloured synthetic male line (CSML) broiler birds.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Birds, Feeding and Management

The experiment was conducted in two phases. The phase-I was conducted during chick period (0-5weeks). During this period, 360 day-old female broiler chicks of CSML strain were distributed into 3 groups (18-SCP, 19-SCP and 20-SCP) and fed ad libitum with iso-caloric (2850Kcal ME/Kg) starter rations containing 18, 19 or 20% SCP (Starter CP) up to 5th week. The phase-II was conducted during growing period (6-20 weeks). During this period, out of 120 chicks raised on each starter CP level, 96 grower pullets with higher BW were selected. The birds of each group (96) were further divided into two groups i.e. high body weight (HB) and low body weight (LB) groups with 48 chicks per group each. The pullets of each BW group were randomly distributed in 6 replicate groups with similar mean BW. Three of the replicate groups were allotted to iso-caloric (2750Kcal ME/Kg) grower rations with 10 or 14% GCP (Grower CP). In total, there are 12 dietary treatments (18-HB-14 i.e. 18% starter CP-high BW-14% grower CP, 18-HB-10, 18-LB-14, 18-LB-10, 19-HB-14, 19-HB-10, 19-LB-14, 19-LB-10, 20-HB-14, 20-HB-10, 20-LB-14, 20-LB-10). Restricted feeding was practised from 6-20weeks according to the energy model of Sakomura et al. (2003). From 21-23weeks, a pre-breeder ration with 16% CP and 2850Kcal ME/kg and from 24-50weeks, a breeder ration with 16% CP and 2750Kcal ME/kg was fed to the birds.

Daily maximum and minimum temperature forecast data were collected. The daily effective temperature was calculated by using the following formula and this effective temperature was used in energy models.

Effective temperature = [(daytime high temperature × 2) + (night low temperature)] /3

The birds were housed in floor pens up to 20 weeks. After 20 weeks onwards, birds were shifted to cage house. All the birds had access to clean and fresh drinking water round the clock. The chicks were exposed to 23 h of lighting and a dark period of 1 h per day from 0-5 weeks. From 6th week onwards, the birds were maintained under natural day light till 20th week of age. Then lighting hours was gradually increased to 17 h at 24th week. Routine vaccination and medication program was carried out regularly for the experimental stock. Starting from 8th week, deworming of the stock was carried out at every two months interval. The birds were beak trimmed during 10th week of age.

Protocol Design

The weekly target BWs were set by plotting a linear graph targeting a BW of 2200g at 20th week. By subtracting the target BW at 20th week from the recorded 5th week BW and dividing it by the number of weeks, the weekly gain required was calculated. Weekly ME requirement/bird/day was calculated by energy model of Sakomura et al. (2003). During breeder period, ME requirement was calculated using the energy model of Sakomura (2004). Feed consumption of the birds was recorded replicate-wise weekly. The CP and ME intakes were calculated from the feed intake values, taking the CP and ME content of the feed into consideration. From the weekly BW, feed CP and ME consumption data, feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER) and energy efficiency ratio (EER) were calculated. Body conformation traits such as shank length and keel length were measured according to McGovern (2002) at 5th and 20th weeks.

Statistical Analysis

Completely randomized design was followed. All data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SPSS 16.0. Significance was declared at P≤0.05.

Results and Discussion

Phase-I

BW, BW Gain and Body Conformation Traits

The 5th week BW of 18% and 19% SCP groups were higher (P≤0.05) than the 20% SCP group (Table 1). The BW gain (0-5weeks) also followed a similar trend. Smith and Pesti (1998) reported that when broiler birds were fed diets with CP 18-24% at 12.96MJ/kg, the weight gain was maximum at 19.4% CP intake. In another study with similar CP levels at 13.38MJ/kg, they reported that with increase in CP levels, the maximum gain was recorded at 22% CP. Nguyen and Buchasak (2005) reported that CP level >17% did not show any significant effect on growth and BW. Roy et al. (2010) reported that birds fed 19% CP diet had significantly higher BW than 18 and 20% CP fed groups. Variations in response to dietary CP intake by different strains have been reported by several workers. Berrhe and Gous (2008) reported that BW gain was greater in Cobb than Ross broiler. Smith and Pesti (1998), by feeding 3 levels of dietary CP (16, 20 and 24%) to Ross×Ross 208 and Peterson×Arbor Acre crosses observed that Ross birds were heavier at each age. They opined that strain has highly significant effect on BW. The findings of the present experiment is in agreement with the findings of other workers who reported that linear increase in CP level is not necessarily associated with a linear increase in BW. Growth is a function of gene and nutrition interaction. Therefore, not only nutrient levels but the genetic potential of the birds is also a factor controlling growth. The BW and BW gain of birds at 18% CP level was probably adequate to support growth which showed similar performance with 19% CP level. At 20% CP level, the growth reduction could be associated with metabolism of high CP intake. The 5th week shank length (SL) ranged between 7.35-7.58cm (Table 1). The feed intake and 5th week BWs were higher in 19% SCP group than other groups which might have contributed to higher keel length (KL). Similar findings were recorded by Romero-Sanchez et al. (2007).

Table 1: BW, BW gain, shank and keel length of chicks at 5th week

Treatment BW BW Gain Shank Length Keel Length
(5th wk) (0-5th wk)
18-SCP 797.79a 753.49a 7.36 7.36b
19-SCP 802.49a 758.32a 7.58 7.62a
20-SCP 741.5b 698.09b 7.35 7.44b
SEM 5.991 5.305 0.076 0.035
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0.001 0 0.14 0.005

a,bMeans within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

Nutrient Intake and Efficiency

There was no significant difference in CP and ME intakes and FCR, PER and EER among treatment groups (Table 2). Sterling et al. (2003), Kermanshahi et al. (2011) and Folorunso and Onibi (2012) using CP levels from 12.3-25% reported no significant difference in feed intake. It has been reported by Kamran et al. (2008) and Steiner et al. (2008) that, feed intake decreased with increase in dietary CP levels while taking a protein range from 16.5-23%. Berhe and Gous (2008) using 12.4-26.8% CP diets reported that feed intake remained unchanged with CP levels from 15.3-21%, when the CP level decreased below 15.3% and increased above 21%, the feed intake decreased. The CP intake was a product of feed intake and CP% of diet and hence influenced by these factors. Kamran et al. (2008) and Widyaratne and Drew (2011) using CP levels from 12.3-24% reported that PER decreased with increase in the level of dietary CP indicating better efficiency of protein utilization in diets with higher CP levels. From the results of the present study, where a narrow range of variation in the CP level was incorporated, the PER values seemed to be unaffected by the dietary CP intake. Sterling et al. (2003), Nguyen and Bunchasak (2005), Berhe and Gous (2008), Kamran et al. (2008) and Steiner et al. (2008) have reported that the FCR increased with decrease in dietary protein level. Berhe and Gous (2008) reported that CP levels above or below 15-21% range increased the FCR values indicating poor feed efficiency. In contrast to the present findings, Kamran et al. (2008) in a study on broiler finisher using four different diets with CP levels 17-20% and ME levels 2635-3100Kcal/kg diet with constant ME:CP ratio observed that the energy efficiency decreased with decrease in dietary CP and ME.

Table 2: Nutrient intake and nutrient efficiency of chicks at 5th week

Treatment Feed Intake CP Intake ME Intake FCR PER EER
18-SCP 1861.87 335.14 5399.44 2.47 0.44 7.16
19-SCP 1825.51 346.85 5293.99 2.41 0.46 6.98
20-SCP 1624.36 324.87 4710.65 2.33 0.47 6.75
SEM 84.63 15.56 245.43 0.1 0.02 0.29
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0.183 0.63 0.183 0.628 0.733 0.628

Phase-II

BW and BW Gain

The 5th week BW of birds did not differ among BW groups within starter CP level (Table 3).

Table 3: BW of birds during different periods (g)

Treatment 5th wk 20th wk 24th wk 30th wk 40th wk 50th wk
18-HB-14 883.12a 2023.70abc 2610.6 3027.44 3331 3347.5
18-HB-10 868.46a 1898.21bc 2685.33 3154.8 3429.67 3768
18-LB-14 718.75c 2027.74abc 2541.64 2842.33 3253.33 3841.75
18-LB-10 717.29c 1917.39abc 2617.37 3113.67 3354.5 3631.75
19-HB-14 884.16a 1989.91abc 2521.14 2823.22 3056.75 3320.5
19-HB-10 885.33a 1917.32abc 2538 2870.22 3354.75 3460.75
19-LB-14 710.36c 1994.43abc 2547.74 2877.44 3279 3774.25
19-LB-10 734.38c 1876.88c 2567.5 2845 3578.67 3676
20-HB-14 806.54b 2104.37a 2622.79 2948.67 3447 3554.75
20-HB-10 824.08b 1970.58abc 2672.76 3137.22 3406 3817.25
20-LB-14 669.38d 2087.20ab 2565.1 3132.22 3424.33 3714.5
20-LB-10 666.04d 1974.00abc 2628.27 2991.56 3655 3679.5
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0 0.093 0.122 0.501 0.28 0.548
BW 0 0.898 0.372 0.551 0.338 0.09
GCP 0.001 0.143 0.087 0.074 0.431
SCP×BW 0.663 0.939 0.474 0.387 0.385 0.43
SCP×GCP 0.938 0.788 0.151 0.575 0.917
BW×GCP 0.964 0.933 0.323 0.609 0.061
SCP×BW×GCP 0.91 0.997 0.098 0.779 0.694

a-d Means within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

The 5th week BW of HB groups belonging to 18 and 19% SCP were similar and significantly higher than the 20% SCP HB group. The 5th week BW of LB groups also followed a similar trend. The 20th week BW of different groups ranged between 1876.88-2104.37g. The 20th week BW of all the 14% GCP groups had numerically higher values than the 10% BW group within the same SCP and same BW groups.

During growing period, BW gain of 20-LB-14 group was highest (1417g) among all treatment groups (Table 4). BW gain of 18-HB-10 and 19-HB-10 were significantly lower than all other groups. Within SCP and BW groups, 14% GCP groups had higher BW gain than 10% GCP groups.

Table 4: BW gain of birds during different periods (g)

Treatment 0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk 0-50wk
18-HB-14 839.91a 1138bc 1978abcd 3241c
18-HB-10 824.10a 1030d 1854de 3629abc
18-LB-14 673.55c 1309ab 1983abc 3816a
18-LB-10 672.94c 1202bc 1875cde 3607abc
19-HB-14 839.86a 1107cd 1947abcde 3278bc
19-HB-10 842.00a 1037d 1879cde 3480abc
19-LB-14 664.96c 1280b 1945abcde 3771a
19-LB-10 689.78c 1142cd 1832e 3652ab
20-HB-14 766.24b 1293b 2059a 3517ab
20-HB-10 782.15b 1146cd 1929bcde 3767a
20-LB-14 624.81d 1417a 2042ab 3668ab
20-LB-10 620.83d 1308ab 1929bcde 3607abc
SEM 10.96 36.73 37.45 119.28
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0 0 0.007 0.527
BW 0 0 0.765 0.007
GCP 0 0 0.286
SCP*BW 0.734 0.788 0.776 0.122
SCP*GCP 0.884 0.821 0.941
BW*GCP 0.818 0.93 0.007
SCP*BW*GCP 0.6 0.8 0.634

a-eMeans within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

In all 14% GCP groups, the cumulative CP intake (0-20wk) was higher than 10% GCP groups. Starter and grower protein levels had significant (P<0.01) effect on BW gain during this period. The BW gain from 0-50wk exhibited wide variations, ranging from 3241-3767g/bird. The 5th week BW and GCP intake interaction had significant (P<0.05) effect on BW gain during this period. Feed was offered to all the groups to attain the target BW of 2200g. However, the target BW could not be achieved in any of the groups. This could be due to severe summer stress coupled with high relative humidity during the growing period. Reduction in BW due to low CP intake during growing period has been reported by several workers. Robey et al. (1988) reported that pullet receiving 12% and 14% show significant lower BW at 20th week than pullet receiving 16% or 18% CP diet. However, Wolde et al. (2011) in a study on RIR chicks, fed 5 levels of CP diets (14, 16, 18, 20 and 22%) and reported that BW of chicks were not significant. From the earlier reports, it is envisaged that where the dietary CP levels were more than 14%, there is hardly any significant change in BW. However, when dietary CP levels ≥14% are compared with <14% CP diets, then significant decrease in BW is recorded with decrease in dietary CP level. The BW of the birds at 24th, 30th, 40th and 50th weeks did not differ significantly. The groups having low 20th week BW might have compensated the BW gain during this period leading to insignificant difference between the groups. Similar compensatory growth has been reported by de Beer and Coon (2006).

Body Conformation Traits

The 5th week SL and KL of treatment groups were influenced by 5th week BW (Table 5).

Table 5: Shank and keel length of birds during different periods

Treatment 5th week 20th week
Shank Length Keel Length Shank Length Keel Length
18-HB-14 7.63abc 7.79ab 11.23b 13.76
18-HB-10 7.72abc 7.86ab 11.00b 13.4
18-LB-14 7.23bc 7.20cd 11.25b 14
18-LB-10 7.04c 6.80d 11.18b 13.68
19-HB-14 8.00a 8.25a 11.15b 13.57
19-HB-10 7.78ab 8.04ab 11.16b 13.45
19-LB-14 7.29bc 7.08cd 11.55a 13.77
19-LB-10 7.17bc 7.06cd 11.10b 13.5
20-HB-14 7.55abc 7.56bc 11.19b 14
20-HB-10 7.54abc 7.87ab 11.07b 14.03
20-LB-14 7.12bc 7.19cd 11.00b 13.96
20-LB-10 7.15bc 7.07cd 11.06b 13.73
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0.348 0.344 0.067 0.045
BW 0 0 0.338 0.583
GCP 0.546 0.03 0.087
SCP*BW 0.712 0.222 0.135 0.342
SCP*GCP 0.607 0.381 0.725
BW*GCP 0.314 0.758 0.605
SCP*BW*GCP 0.461 0.042 0.88

a-eMeans within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

The SL and KL of all HB groups were similar and were significantly higher than all LB groups. Similarly, the SL and KL of all the LB groups did not differ significantly. During 20th week, the SL of 19-LB-14 group was higher (11.55; P<0.05) than other groups. The 20th week KL of treatment groups did not differ significantly from each other. Lilburn et al. (1990) reported that the frame size or skeletal growth in broiler breeder is primarily a function of BW gain. Difference in dietary protein and energy can influence the rate of gain and in this way indirectly influence skeletal growth. The correlation between BW and SL and KL are high, positive and significant. In the present experiment, the 5th week SL and KL of all HB groups were significantly higher than that of LB groups indicating a positive correlation between them. Yaissle and Lilbun (1998) reported that variation in 5th week BW due to dietary treatments was minimized at 20th week due to compensatory growth as observed in the present study.

Nutrient Intake

Highest feed intake of 9.49kg was recorded in 18-LB-10 group which was similar to other groups except 20-HB-14, 20-HB-10 and 20-LB-14 groups (Table 6).

Table 6: Nutrient intake of birds during different periods

Treatment Feed Intake (g) CP Intake (g) ME Intake (Kcal)
0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk 0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk 0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk
18-HB-14 2099a 7122a 9221abc 377.76a 997.24ab 1375a 5998a 19562a 25560abc
18-HB-10 2031ab 7302b 9333ab 365.50a 726.5d 1092b 5803ab 20067b 25870ab
18-LB-14 1649cd 7516c 9165abcd 249.40b 1117.6a 1367a 4715cd 20695c 25410abcd
18-LB-10 1654cd 7755d 9409a 249.40b 849.6cd 1099b 4729cd 21351d 26080a
19-HB-14 2017ab 7167a 9184abcd 383.25a 1000.75ab 1384a 5767ab 19693a 25460abcd
19-HB-10 2034ab 7263b 9297abc 265.76b 835.24cd 1101b 5813ab 19957b 25770ab
19-LB-14 1607cd 7522c 9129abcd 265.76b 1110.24a 1376a 4595cd 20705c 25300abcd
19-LB-10 1656cd 7716d 9372abc 265.76b 842.24cd 1108b 4737cd 21233d 25970ab
20-HB-14 1786bc 7197a 8983cd 357.11a 1000.89ab 1358a 5106bc 19774a 24880cd
20-HB-10 1809bc 7287b 9096cd 280.34b 794.66cd 1075b 5173bc 20017b 25190bcd
20-LB-14 1470d 7458c 8928d 280.34b 1070.66ab 1351a 4208d 20522c 24730d
20-LB-10 1431d 7740d 9171abcd 280.34b 802.66cd 1083b 4094d 21306d 25400abcd
SEM 88.46 0.002 84.63 12.87 0.002 15.52 251.83 0.002 241.08
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0.002 0.638 0.001 0.24 1 0.085 0.002 0.592 0.001
BW 0 0 0.838 0 0 0.991 0 0 0.844
GCP 0 0.001 0 0 0 0.002
SCP*BW 0.861 0.314 1 0 0.462 1 0.861 0.894 1
SCP*GCP 0.642 1 0.715 1 0.841 1
BW*GCP 0 0.192 0 0.4 0 0.207
SCP*BW*GCP 0.677 1 0.972 1 0.99 1

a-dMeans within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

SCP and GCP had highly significant effect (P<0.05) on cumulative feed intake. The data on cumulative CP intake from 0-20wk reveals that all the 14% GCP fed groups irrespective of SCP and BW had more than 1300g cumulative CP intake. Similarly, in all the 10% GCP groups, the cumulative CP intake ranged between 1075-1108g and were lower (P<0.05) than 14% GCP fed groups. GCP had significant effect (P<0.01) on cumulative CP intake. The cumulative ME intake of treatment groups ranged between 24730-26080Kcal. The ME intake of 18-LB-10 group was similar to other groups except 20-HB-14, 20-HB-10 and 20-LB-14 groups. The ME intake of treatment groups was influenced by SCP (P<0.01) and GCP (P<0.05).

Nutrient Utilization Efficiency

The FCR value of 18-HB-10, 18-LB-10, 19-HB-10 and 19-LB-10 groups were similar and higher (P<0.05) than other groups (Table 7).

Table 7: Nutrient efficiency of birds during different periods

Treatment FCR PER EER
0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk 0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk 0-5wk 6-20wk 0-20wk
18-HB-14 2.21b 6.47cd 4.66def 0.41b 0.91a 0.69ab 6330b 1780cd 1292def
18-HB-10 2.26b 7.26ab 5.03ab 0.42b 0.73bc 0.59cd 6448b 1996ab 1396ab
18-LB-14 2.76a 5.58ef 4.62ef 0.51a 0.78b 0.69ab 7890a 1534ef 1281ef
18-LB-10 2.78a 6.28cde 5.02abc 0.51a 0.63de 0.59cd 7935a 1727cde 1392abc
19-HB-14 2.17b 6.66abc 4.72bcde 0.42b 0.93a 0.71a 6217b 1832abc 1308bcde
19-HB-10 2.17b 7.30a 4.96abcd 0.42b 0.73bc 0.59cd 6198b 2009a 1376abcd
19-LB-14 2.74a 5.73def 4.70cde 0.53a 0.80b 0.71a 7845a 1575def 1303cde
19-LB-10 2.64a 6.63abc 5.12a 0.51a 0.66cd 0.61c 7564a 1823abc 1420a
20-HB-14 2.12b 5.70ef 4.36f 0.43b 0.80b 0.66b 6062b 1566ef 1209f
20-HB-10 2.08b 6.52bc 4.72bcde 0.42b 0.65cde 0.56d 5939b 1794bc 1307bcde
20-LB-14 2.60a 5.15f 4.37f 0.53a 0.72bc 0.66b 7439a 1417f 1211f
20-LB-10 2.62a 5.77def 4.75bcde 0.53a 0.58e 0.56d 7488a 1587def 1317bcde
SEM 0.11 0.237 0.1 0.02 0.026 0.013 312.11 651.3 277.48
Source of Variation Probability
SCP 0.183 0 0 0.677 0 0 0.186 0 0
BW 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.775 0 0 0.701
GCP 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCP*BW 0.99 0.692 0.79 0.987 0.617 0.824 0.99 0.692 0.792
SCP*GCP 0.99 0.932 0.751 0.808 0.99 0.932
BW*GCP 0.96 0.511 0.324 0.58 0.96 0.515
SCP*BW*GCP 0.772 0.837 0.699 0.867 0.772 0.838

a-fMeans within a column without superscript differ significantly (P≤0.05)

The FCR value of 18-HB-14, 18-LB-14, 20-HB-14 and 20-LB-14 groups did not differ significantly from each other but lower (P<0.05) than other groups indicating better feed efficiency. The FCR values were significantly influenced by the SCP levels. The feed efficiency of groups for 6-20wk and 0-20wk decreased with decrease in GCP level and decrease in cumulative CP intake. Smith and Pesti (1998) have reported that, with higher CP levels; some genetic strains maintain consumption levels but grow more, resulting in improved feed utilization efficiency whereas, other genetic strains consume less feed but maintain growth levels resulting in improved feed utilization efficiency. Wolde et al. (2011) also reported that pullets on low CP diets require lower amount of feed for unit body mass gain than those on higher CP groups. Therefore, better feed efficiency obtained in 14% GCP groups in the present experiment may be justified.

Low PER values were obtained for 20-LB-10, 20-HB-10, 20-HB-10 and 20-LB-10 groups. PER value of 19-LB-14, 19-HB-14, 18-HB-14 and 18-LB-14 groups were higher (P<0.05) than other groups. The PER values were influenced by SCP and GCP levels (P<0.05). The protein utilization efficiency of all 10% GCP groups was found to be better as compared to 14% GCP groups. Similar to the present findings, Nguyen and Bunchasak (2005), Kamran et al. (2008) and Widyaratne and Drew (2011) reported that protein efficiency was better for low CP diets. From 0-20wk period, low EER value indicating better energy utilization was recorded in 18-HB-14, 18-LB-14, 20-HB-14 and 20-LB-14 groups. SCP and GCP levels had significant effect (P<0.01) on EER. In low CP groups, reduced CP intake, poor feed efficiency as well as low BWs were recorded which might have influenced EER adversely. Similarly, Kamran et al. (2008) reported that energy efficiency decreased with decrease in dietary CP and ME intakes.

Conclusion

From the present study, it was concluded that birds fed starter diet with 19% CP and grower diet with 14% CP had better body conformation, growth and feed efficiency.

References

  1. Berhe ET and Gous RM. 2008. Effect of dietary protein content on growth, uniformity and mortality of two commercial broiler strains. South African Journal of Animal Science.38(4):293-302.
  2. de Beer M and Coon CN. 2006. The effect of increased protein intake during the starter and pre breeder periods on reproductive performance of ultra high yield broiler breeder hens. International Journal of Poultry Science. 5(9):812-821.
  3. Folorunso OR and Onibi GE. 2012. Effect of diets of different levels fed on dry or wet forms on the performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken finishers. International Journal of Agriscience. 2(6):538-545.
  4. Furlan RL, Faria DDF, Rosa PS and Macari M. 2004. Does low-protein diet improve broiler performance under heat stress conditions? Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola. 6(2):71-79.
  5. Kamran Z, Sarwar M, Nisa M, Nadeem MA, Mahmood S, Babar ME and Ahmed S. 2008. Effect of low protein diets having constant energy to protein ratio on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken from one to thirty-five days of age. Poultry Science. 87:468-474.
  6. Kermanshahi H, Ziaei N and Pilevar M. 2011. Effect of dietary crude protein fluctuation on performance, blood parameters and nutrient retention in broiler chicken during starter period. Global Veterinaria. 6(2):162-167.
  7. Lilburn MS and Myers-Miller DJ. 1990. Effect of body weight, feed allowance, and dietary protein intake during the pre breeder period on early reproductive performance of broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science. 69:1118-1125.
  8. McGovern RH. 2002. Reproduction in broiler breeder males. A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty of the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
  9. Nguyen TV and Bunchasak C. 2005. Effects of dietary protein and energy on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Betong chicken at early growth stage. Songklanakarin Journal of Science Technology 27(6):1171-1178.
  10. Robey WW, McDaniel GR, Sutton CD, Renden JA and McGuire J. 1988. Factors affecting broiler breeder performance. Effect of varying levels of dietary protein on the development and reproductive performance of the dwarf broiler breeder. Poultry Science67:219-225.
  11. Romero-Sanchez H, Plumsted PW and Brake J. 2007. Feeding broiler breeder males.1.Effect of feeding programme and dietary crude protein during rearing on body weight and fertility of broiler breeder males. Poultry Science. 86:168-174.
  12. Roy SC, Alam MS, Ali ML, Chowdhury SD and Goswami C. 2010. Different levels of protein on the performance of synthetic broiler. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 8(2):117-122.
  13. Sakomura NK, Silva R, Couto HP, et al 2003. Modeling metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder pullets. Poultry Science. 82:419-427.
  14. Sakomura NK. 2004. Modeling energy utilization in broiler breeders, laying hens and broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 6(1):1-11.
  15. Smith ER and Pesti GM. 1998. Influence of broiler strain cross and dietary protein on the performance of broilers. Poultry Science. 77:276-281.
  16. Steiner Z, Domnacinovic M, Antunovic Z, Steiner Z, Sencic D, Wagner J and Kis D. 2008. Effect of dietary protein/energy combinations on male broiler breeder performance. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2:107-115.
  17. Sterling KG, Pesti GM and Bakalli RI. 2003. Performance of broiler chicks fed various levels of dietary lysine and crude protein. Poultry Science. 82:1939-1947.
  18. Widyaratne GP and Drew MD. 2011. Effects of protein level and digestibility on the growth and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science90:595-603.
  19. Wolde S, Negesse T and Melesse A. 2011. Effect of dietary protein concentration on feed intake, body mass gain and carcass traits of Rhode Island Red chicken. Journal of Science and Development. 1(1):53-64.
  20. Yaissle J and Lilburn MS. 1998. Effects of dietary protein and strain on the growth of broiler breeder pullets from zero to five weeks of age. Poultry Science. 77:1613-1619.
Full Text Read : 1706 Downloads : 315
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close