Previous
Next
### Estimation of Growth Curve Parameters Using Non-Linear Growth Curve Models in Sonadi Sheep

Full Text
Read : 2949
Downloads : 521
Previous
Next

Lokesh Gautam Vishnu Kumar Hina Ashraf Waiz Rajendra Kumar Nagda

Vol 8(9), 104-113

DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20180131044656

Sonadi sheep rearing is an important livelihood for a large number of small and marginal farmers in Southern Rajasthan. Growth, defined as changes of body weight over time is an economically important trait in sheep that directly determines meat production. The present study was aimed to estimate the growth curve parameters for live-weight from birth to 12 months age in Sonadi sheep. Data on 56 Sonadi sheep, including 28 males and 28 female which were born in year 2016 maintained at Mega Sheep Seed Project, Vallabhnagar, Udaipur were used. Non-linear growth models, viz. Gompertz, Brody, negative exponential, logistic and Von Bertalanffy were used for estimating the growth curve parameters. Average of live weight (Kg.) in Sonadi sheep from birth to 12th month of age were 3.27±0.081, 6.72±0.202, 9.06±0.267, 12.19±0.388, 15.01±0.44, 16.21±0.51, 16.75±0.54, 18.54±0.586, 18.59±0.599, 20.86±0.586, 21.51±0.517, 22.10±0.522 and 23.15±0.512, respectively. The value of growth parameters for lamb from Brody model; “A”, “B” and “K” were 26.033±1.109, 0.872±0.016 and 0.160±0.018, respectively. Adjusted determination coefficient (R2adj), RMSE and AICc were 0.991, 0.599 and – 5.08, respectively. As a result of highest R2adj and lowest RMSE, AICc, Brody model can be said an appropriate model for drawing growth curve.

Keywords : Body Weight Growth Curve Parameters Sonadi Sheep Non-Linear Model

Sheep rearing play a significant role in livestock sector and is essential for the livelihood for a large number of small and marginal farmers of India. Sheep are efficient converters of unutilized poor quality grass and crop residues into meat and fiber. The evaluation of increase in the productivity of an animal is important with respect to sale of lamb, body weight gain and income from sheep by culling of the inferior animals in the flock. Approximately, Rajasthan with 9.08 million of sheep population, Livestock census (2012) is the 3^{rd} largest sheep rearing state of India. Sonadi sheep is an important mutton breed of southern Rajasthan and prevails in southern sub-humid zone comprising Udaipur, Chittorgarh, Rajasamand, Dungarpur and Banswara district of Rajasthan. Sonadi sheep has the unique characteristics like it is devoid of wool on face, legs and has white fleece. This breed can survive under harsh conditions of Rajasthan.

Growth, defined as changes of body weight over time is an economically important trait in sheep that directly determines meat production. Knowing the growth traits of a sheep is important for number of reasons such as relating to breeding, feeding, healthcare and monitoring growth pattern. Changes in live weight or dimension for a period of time are explained by the growth curves Keskin *et al.* (2009). This is often sigmoid in shape. Sigmoid curve has three phases; preparing, increasing and quietness. Different mathematical growth models express the life time growth curve. Growth curve parameters can be used as phenotypic traits and to analyze relationship between them. Growth curve parameters provide potentially helpful criteria for changing the association between body weight and age through selection and breeding Kachman and Gionola (1984) and an optimum growth curve can be obtained by selection for desired values of growth curve parameters Bathaei and Leroy (1998). Growth curve is useful in several applications to animal husbandry, such as analysis of the interaction between sub-population and time; evaluation of the response to different treatments over time; and identification of heavier animal at younger ages with in a population Bathaei and Leroy (1996); Fretas (2005) and Malhado *et al.* (2009). In order to increase farmer’s income, there needs to be improvement in the production of these animals. Slow growth rate resulting in low market weight has been identified to be one of the factors limiting profitability in any production system Noor *et al.* (2001). No previous studies have been conducted on growth curve characteristics of the Sonadi sheep. Brown *et al.* (1976) compared different non-linear models, viz. Von Bertalanffy, Logistic, Gompertz, Brody and Richards to fit weight-age data of beef and dairy cows. Therefore, the present study was taken up to characterize the growth pattern of Sonadi sheep using nonlinear regression models which can be used as selection criterion in the breeding programmes and to evaluate the present status of the breed under field conditions. For this purpose, five non-linear models (Gompertz, Brody, Negative exponential, Logistic and Von Bertalanffy) were compared to evaluate their efficiency in describing the growth curve of Sonadi sheep.

**Material and Methods**

The experiment was carried out at the College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Navania, Vallbhnagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan ,under the Mega Sheep Seed Project in which a flock of about 400 Sonadi sheep is being maintained. It is situated at 582m above mean sea level (24˚35” N and 73˚43’’ E) characterized by semi-arid climatic conditions with undulated topography having an average rainfall of 800 mm mainly during monsoon season from July to September. Similarly, the temperature ranges from 2.3°C to 42.3°C. In this research, monthly live weight from birth to 12 month of age for 28 males and 28 females were measured with 50 g sensitivity scale.

**Statistical Analysis**

For drawing growth curves, early growth periods can be explained the linear model but after these periods linearity is distorted. Five asymptotic non-linear functions models were considered for fitting the average monthly body weight data. The five nonlinear growth models viz. Brody; Brody (1945), Von bertalanffy; Bertalanffy (1957), Logistic; Nelder (1961), Gompertz; Laird (1965) and Negative exponential; Brown *et al.* (1976) were used for drawing growth curves. Nonlinear regression models (Table 1) were considered in this study to describe body weight growth by age in Sonadi sheep were as follows-

**Table 1: **Nonlinear regression models

Equation |
Functional Form |

Gompertz | |

Brody | |

Negative exponential | |

Logistic | |

Von Bertalanffy |

*The growth curve parameters used in the different functions can be interpreted as follows: W_{t} Observed live weight at age t, A time to infinite predicted mature live weight; the parameter A is average weight at maturity, that is asymptotic limit of the weight when age (t) approaches infinity, B Folding point of growth t = 0; The proportion of the asymptotic mature weight to be gained after birth, K Growth rate; the rate with which weight approaches A, the asymptote, Large value of k indicate that the animal would mature early, e Natural logarithm base and t time at when weight was observed. *

The five non-linear growth models in Table 1 were fitted separately for general, males and females and parameters of model were estimated by Levenberg-Marquardt irritation methods Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G. (1988), which minimize sum of squared errors. In this research SPSS 22 software was used for parameters prediction and goodness of fitness test.

To examine model performance (quality of prediction), adjusted coefficient of determination (R^{2}_{adj}) is used. However, (Kvalseth, 1985) has emphasized that, although R^{2}_{adj} is quite appropriate even for non-linear models, uncritical use of and sole reliance on R^{2}_{adj} statistics may fail to reveal important data characteristics and model inadequacies. Hence, in addition to R^{2}_{adj}, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and corrected Akaike’s information criteria (AICc) (Table 3) were used as the goodness of fit criterion to access the suitability of models fitted. Adjusted coefficient of determination (R^{2}_{adj}) was calculated using the following formula-

Where R^{2} is the multiple coefficient of determination (R^{2} = 1-RSS/TSS). TSS is total sum of square, RSS is residual sum of square, n is the number of observation (data point) and p is the number of parameters in the equation. The R^{2} value is an indicator measuring the proportion of total variation about the mean of the trait explained by the growth curve model. The coefficient of determination lies always between 0 to 1, and the fit of a model is satisfactory if R^{2} is close to unity. Root mean square error (RMSE) is a kind of generalized standard deviation and was calculated as follows-

Where RSS is residual sum of square, n is the number of observation (data point) and p is the number of parameters in the equation. RMSE value is one of the most important criteria to compare the suitability of used growth curve models. Therefore, the best model is the one with the lowest RMSE. Akaike’s information criteria (AIC) was calculated as using the equation Burnham and Anderson (2004)-

Corrected Akaike’s information criteria (AICc) was calculated as using the equation Motulsky and Christopoulos (2004)-

AICc is a good static for comparison of models of different complexity because it adjust the RSS for number of parameters in the model. A smaller numerical value of AICc indicates a better fit when comparing models.

**Result and Discussions **

Descriptive values of Sonadi sheep live weight from birth to 12^{th} month of age is given in Table 2. General mean of live weight (Kg.) in Sonadi sheep from birth to 12^{th} month of age were 3.27±0.081, 6.72±0.202, 9.06±0.267, 12.19±0.388, 15.01±0.44, 16.21±0.51, 16.75±0.54, 18.54±0.586, 18.59±0.599, 20.86±0.586, 21.51±0.517, 22.10±0.522 and 23.15±0.512, respectively. At the result of analysis, every month of age live weight of Sonadi sheep except birth to 5^{th} month influenced statistically significant from sex factor (P<0.05); and on these month male weight higher than female. Similar results were agreement with Gansan *et al.* (2015) in Madras Red sheep, Tatar *et al.* (2009) in Young hair goat. Because of sex factor significantly influence live weight data were standardized according to this factor. Standardized data were used for drawing growth curves.

** **

**Table 2: **Descriptive statistics of live weight in Sonadi sheep

Periods |
Sex |
N |
Mean ± SE |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Coefficient of Variation (%) |

At birth | Male | 28 | 3.17±0.101 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 16.96 |

Female | 28 | 3.36±0.125 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 19.72 | |

General | 56 | 3.27±0.081 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 18.53 | |

1^{st} Month |
Male | 28 | 6.68±0.313 | 4.4 | 10.5 | 24.79 |

Female | 28 | 6.75±0.262 | 3.8 | 9.7 | 20.59 | |

General | 56 | 6.72±0.202 | 3.8 | 10.5 | 22.56 | |

2^{nd} Month |
Male | 28 | 9.03±0.386 | 6 | 14.2 | 22.65 |

Female | 28 | 9.09±0.377 | 4.9 | 13 | 21.98 | |

General | 56 | 9.06±0.267 | 4.9 | 14.2 | 22.12 | |

3^{rd} Month |
Male | 28 | 12.34±0.585 | 7.3 | 21 | 24.18 |

Female | 28 | 12.05±0.525 | 8 | 17.2 | 23.07 | |

General | 56 | 12.19±0.388 | 7.3 | 21 | 23.43 | |

4^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 15.12±0.702 | 9.8 | 24.4 | 25.59 |

Female | 28 | 14.91±0.559 | 9.6 | 20.5 | 19.83 | |

General | 56 | 15.01±0.445 | 9.6 | 24.4 | 22.21 | |

5^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 16.80±0.853 | 10.6 | 29.3 | 26.87 |

Female | 28 | 15.62±0.581 | 11.1 | 22.7 | 19.69 | |

General | 56 | 16.21±0.517 | 10.6 | 29.3 | 23.9 | |

6^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 17.89±0.907 | 12.5 | 33.5 | 26.84 |

Female | 28 | 15.61±0.526 | 10.2 | 23.5 | 17.86 | |

General | 56 | 16.75±0.542 | 10.2 | 33.5 | 24.22 | |

7^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 19.85±0.962 | 13.2 | 35.5 | 25.64 |

Female | 28 | 17.22±0.592 | 11.7 | 24 | 18.19 | |

General | 56 | 18.53±0.586 | 11.7 | 35.5 | 23.69 | |

8^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 20.71±0.896 | 14.6 | 33.6 | 22.88 |

Female | 28 | 16.47±.571 | 10.6 | 22.6 | 18.35 | |

General | 56 | 18.59±0.599 | 10.6 | 33.6 | 24.1 | |

9^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 22.60±0.866 | 16 | 35 | 20.82 |

Female | 28 | 19.13±0.654 | 12.6 | 25.4 | 18.08 | |

General | 56 | 20.86±0.586 | 12.6 | 35 | 21.01 | |

10^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 23.10±0.816 | 16.4 | 32.4 | 18.69 |

Female | 28 | 19.92±0.487 | 14 | 25.3 | 12.44 | |

General | 56 | 21.51±0.517 | 14 | 32.4 | 17.99 | |

11^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 24.17±0.682 | 19 | 32.5 | 14.94 |

Female | 28 | 20.03±0.573 | 14 | 27.1 | 15.14 | |

General | 56 | 22.10±0.522 | 14 | 32.5 | 17.96 | |

12^{th} Month |
Male | 28 | 25.15±0.723 | 20.1 | 33.7 | 15.21 |

Female | 28 | 21.15±0.500 | 16.4 | 25.6 | 12.51 | |

General | 56 | 23.15±0.512 | 16.4 | 33.7 | 16.55 |

The estimated nonlinear regression model growth parameters, their standard error and goodness of fit statistically namely adjusted coefficient of determination (R^{2}_{adj}), root mean square error (RMSE) and corrected akaike’s information criteria (AICc) for the Gompertz, Brody, Negative exponential, Logistic and Von Bertalanfy models are presented (Table 3). There was a variety on the parameter estimates of the models. The *A* parameter which estimates mature weight was the largest for the Brody model in both male and female sheep 30.20±0.923 and 22.39±1.068, respectively and the lowest for the logistic in male and female sheep 24.74±0.728 and 20.050±0.734, respectively (Table 3). The *A* parameter for male sheep is higher in female sheep. The *k* parameter describes earliness of maturing and helpful to define the shape of curve. This parameter offers a unique trait to evaluate animals, and the relationships between size and productivity. The ability of an animal to reach puberty at a younger age given an asymptotic weight in an important consideration. The estimate for *k *was highest for logistic model for both male and female sheep (0.425±0.040 and 0.465±0.069), respectively. Whereas, *k* value was found smallest for Brody’s model for both male and female sheep (0.137±0.010 0.190±0.027), respectively. The estimate *B* parameter was highest for Gompertz model in both male and female (1.856±0.083 and 1.587±0.104) and lowest for Von Bertalanfy model (0.480±0.014 and 0.426±0.028). The similar findings were reported in Madras Red sheep Ganasan *et al.* (2015) and Balan *et al.* (2017) in Mecheri sheep. Different parameter estimates for the various models fit on the same data is a possibility and reported by many Akbas *et al.* (1999); Bilgin *et al.* (2004_{a}); Keskin *et al.* (2009) and Kopuzlu *et al.* (2014) in similar studies conducted earlier.

**Table 3: **Estimated model parameters ± SE and goodness of fit statistics of the nonlinear regression growth models of body weights of ram and ewe lambs

Items |
Model |
Parameters |
Goodness of Fit |
||||

A |
B |
K |
R^{2}_{adj} |
RMSE |
AICc |
||

Male Lambs | Gompertz | 25.999±0.692 | 1.856±0.083 | 0.284±0.021 | 0.992 | 0.627 | -3.87 |

Brody | 30.204±0.923 | 0.897±0.008 | 0.137±0.010 | 0.997 | 0.376 | -17.17 | |

Negative Exponential | 26.798±0.000 | 1.000±0.026 | 0.201±1.489 | 0.968 | 1.318 | 15.41 | |

Logistic | 24.744±0.728 | 1.528±0.178 | 0.425±0.040 | 0.984 | 0.934 | 6.46 | |

Von Bertalanffy | 26.800±0.685 | 0.480±0.014 | 0.236±0.016 | 0.995 | 0.517 | -1.06 | |

Female lambs | Gompertz | 20.698±0.781 | 1.587±0.140 | 0.330±0.045 | 0.971 | 0.973 | 7.51 |

Brody | 22.396±1.068 | 0.844±0.025 | 0.190±0.027 | 0.982 | 0.782 | 1.84 | |

Negative Exponential | 20.516±0.000 | 1.000±0.045 | 0.289±1.066 | 0.928 | 1.552 | 19.65 | |

Logistic | 20.050±0.734 | 1.159±0.206 | 0.465±0.069 | 0.958 | 1.179 | 12.5 | |

Von Bertalanffy | 21.070±0.825 | 0.426±0.028 | 0.285±0.038 | 0.976 | 0.902 | 5.55 | |

Overall lambs | Gompertz | 23.303±0.787 | 1.719±0.112 | 0.302±0.032 | 0.984 | 0.822 | 3.14 |

Brody | 26.033±1.109 | 0.872±0.016 | 0.160±0.018 | 0.991 | 0.599 | -5.08 | |

Negative Exponential | 23.440±0.000 | 1.000±0.034 | 0.239±1.270 | 0.952 | 1.445 | 17.8 | |

Logistic | 22.386±0.761 | 1.330±.193 | 0.437±0.053 | 0.973 | 1.072 | 10.04 | |

Von Bertalanffy | 23.861±0.824 | 0.453±0.021 | 0.256±0.026 | 0.988 | 0.734 | 0.21 |

**Goodness of Fit**

The models adopted were compared using R^{2}_{adj}, RMSE and AICc values to identify the best model in explaining the body weights of males, females and overall population (Fig. 1 and 2). The goodness of fit of the models to explain the growth in Sonadi sheep was found in the order Gompertz, Brody, Negative Exponential, Logistic and Von Bertalanffy. The values of R^{2}_{adj}, RMSE and AIC_{c }for different models are presented in Table 3.

**Fig. 1: **Observed weight (kg) and estimated weight (kg) as a function of age (months) with the non-linear models in Sonadi male lambs

**Fig. 2: **Observed weight (kg) and estimated weight (kg) as a function of age (months) with the non-linear models in Sonadi female lambs

Thus, Brody model was found to be the best model for growth traits on Sonadi sheep due to the lowest values of RMSE and AICc as well as highest value of R^{2}_{adj} for body weights of males, females and overall population. Similar results were obtained in Mecheri sheep by Balan *et al.* (2017), Morkaraman, Awassi and Tushin sheep by Esenbuga *et al.* (2000), Bergamasca sheep by McManus *et al.* (2003), Awassi sheep by Topal *et al.* (2004), West African dwarf sheep by Gbangboche *et al.* (2008), Baluchi sheep by Behzaldi *et al.* (2014) and Madras red sheep by Ganesan *et al.* (2015). However, the Gompertz function was found appropriate for describing the growth curve of Suffolk sheep by Lewis *et al.* (2002), Akkaraman sheep by Kuculk *et al.* (2009), Norduz female lambs by Kum *et al.* (2010) and Malya lambs by Aytekin *et al.* (2010). Also, logistic function was described as the best fit for Santa Ines sheep by Malhado *et al.* (2009) and Silva *et al.* (2012) and for Mengali sheep by Tariq *et al.* (2013).

**Conclusion**

On the basis of indicators viz., the highest R^{2}_{adj} , least RMSE and AIC_{c} values, it is concluded that the Brody function is the best fitted model for the growth curve analysis of Sonadi sheep among the five non-linear models including viz. Gompertz, Brody, Negative Exponential, Logistic and Von Bertalanffy. * *

**Acknowledgements**

We are thankful to Dean, College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Navania and Project Incharge of Mega Sheep Seed Project, Vallabhnagar for providing us the data on Sonadi sheep.

**References**

- Akbas, Y., Taskin, T. and Demiroren, E. (1999). Comparison of several models to fit growth curves of Kivircik and Daglic male lambs.
*Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Sciences, 23*, 537-544. - Aytekin, I., Zulkadir, U., Keskin, I. and Boztepe, S. (2010). Fitting of different mathematic models to the growth curves of female malya lambs weaned at two different live weights.
*Trends in Animal and Veterinary Sciences Journal, 1*(1), 19-23. - Balan, C., Kathiravan, G., Thirunavukkarasu, M. and Jeichitra, V. (2017). Non-linear growth modeling in Mecheri breed of Sheep.
*Journal of Entomology and Zoological Studies,**5*(5), 2005-2008. - Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G. (1988).
*Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications*, New York; Wiley, Second Edition. - Bathaei, S.S. and Leroy, P.L. (1996). Growth and mature weight of Mehraban Iranian fat tailed sheep.
*Small Ruminant Research,**22,*155-162. - Bathaei, S.S. and Leroy, P.L. (1998). Genetic and phenotypic aspects of the growth curve characteristics in Mehraban Iranian fat tailed sheep.
*Small Ruminant Research,**29*, 261-269. - Behzadil, M.R.B., Aslaminejad, A.A., Sharifi, A.R. and Simianer, H. (2014). Comparison of Mathematical Models for Describing the Growth of Baluchi Sheep.
*Journal of Agricultural Science Technology,**14,*57-68. - Bertalanffy, L.V. (1957). Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth.
*Quarterly Review of Biology,**32,*217-230. - Bilgin, O.C., Emsen, E. and Davis, M.E. (2004a). Comparison of nonlinear models for describing growth of scrotal circumference in Awassi male lambs.
*Small Ruminant Research,**52,*155-160.

growth of scrotal circumference in Awassi male lambs. *Small Ruminant Research,* *52,* 155-160.

- Brody, S. (1945).
*Bioenergetics and growth*, New York (NY), Reinhold. - Brown, J.E., Fitzhugh, Jr. H.A. and Cartwright, T.C. (1976). A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight age relationship in cattle.
*Journal of Animal Science, 42*, 810-818. - Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection.
*Social Methods Research*,*33*(2), 261-304. - Esenbuga, N., Bilgin, O.C., Macit, M. and Karaoglu, M. (2000). Growth curves in Awassi, Morkaraman and Tushin lambs.
*The Journal Agric. Fac*,*31,*37-41. - Frietas, A. R. (2005). Curvas de crescimento naproduc ão animal.
*Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia,**34,*786-795. - Ganesan, R., Dhanavanthan, P., Balasubramanyam, D., Kumarasami, P and Kiruthika. (2015). Growth modeling and factors affecting growth traits in Madras red sheep.
*India Journal of Animal Research,**49*(1), 20-25. - Gbangboche, A.B., Glele-Kakai, R., Salofou, S., Albuquerque, L.G. and Leroy, P.L. (2008). Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth curves in West African Dwarf sheep.
*Animal,**2*(7), 1003-1012. - Kachman, S.D. and Gianola, D. (1984). A Bayesian estimator of variance and covariance components in nonlinear growth models.
*Journal of Animal Science,**59*(1), 176. - Keskin, I., Dag, B., Sariyel, V. and Gokmen, M., (2009). Estimation of growth curve parameters in Konya Merino sheep.
*South African Journal of Animal Science,**39,*163-168. - Kopuzlu, S., Sezgin, E., Esenbuga, N. and Bilgin, O.C. (2014). Estimation of growth curve characteristics of Hemsin male and female sheep.
*Journal of Applied Animal Research,**42*(2), 228-232. - Kucuk, M. and Eyduran, E. (2009). The determination of the best growth model for Akkaraman and German Blackheaded Mutton x Akkaraman B1 crossbreed lamb.
*Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences*,*15*, 90–92. - Kum, D., Karakus, K. and Ozdemir, T. (2010). The best non-linear function for body weight at early phase of Norduz female lambs.
*Trakia Journal of Sciences*,*8*, 62-67. - Kvalseth, T.O. (1985). Cautionary note about R
^{2}.*The American Statistician,**39*(4), 279-285. - Laird, A.K. (1965). Dynamics of relative growth.
*Growth,**29,*249-263. - Lewis, R.M., Emmans, G.C., Dingwall, W.S. and Simm, G. (2002). A description of the growth of sheep and its genetic analysis.
*Animal Sciences,**74,*51-62. - Livestock census, (2012). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries,
*Government of India,**http://dahdnicin/* - Malhado, C.H.M., Carneiro, P.L.S., Affonso, P.R.A.M., Souza, A.A.O. and Sarmento, J.L.R. (2009). Growth curves in Dorper sheep crossed with the local Brazilian breeds.
*Small Ruminant Research,**84,*16-21. - McManus, C., Evangelista, C., Fernandes, L.A.C., Miranda, R.M., Moreno Bernal, F.E. and Santos, N.R. (2003). Growth curves of sheep raised in the Federal District Bergamacia.
*Brazilian Journal of Animal Husbandry*,*32*, 1207–1212. - Motulsky, H. and Christopoulos, A. (2004). Fitting models to Biological Data using linear and non-linear regression.
*Oxford university press*. - Nelder, J.A. (1961). The fitting of a generalization of the logistic curve.
*Biometrics*,*17*, 89-110. - Noor, R.R., Djajanegara, A. and Schüler, L. (2001). Selection to Improvement birth and weaning weight of Javanese fat Tailed sheep.
*Archive Tierzucht*,*44*, 649-659. - Silva, L.S.A., Fraga, A.B., Silva, F.L., Beelen, P.M.G., Silva, R.M.O., Tonhati, H. and Barros, C.C. (2012). Growth curve in Santa Ines sheep.
*Small Ruminant Research, 105,*182-185. - Tariq, M.M., Iqbal, F., Eyduran, E., Bajwa, M.A., Huma, Z.E. and Waheed, A. (2013). Comparison of Non-Linear functions to describe the growth in Mengali sheep breed of Balochistan.
*Pakistan Journal of Zoology*,*45*(3), 661-665. - Tatar, A.M., Tekel, N., Özkam, M., Baritci, I. and Gürsel, D. (2009). The determination of growth function in young hair goat.
*Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances,**8*(2), 213-216. - Topal, M., Ozdemir, M., Aksakal, V., Yildiz, N. and Dogru, U. (2004). Determination of the best nonlinear function in order to estimate growth in Morkaraman and Awassi lambs.
*Small Ruminant Research*,*55,*229-232.