NAAS Score 2019


Declaration Format

Please download DeclarationForm and submit along with manuscript.


Free counters!


Flies Menaces in Dairy Farm and Its Strategies for Prevention and Control: An Overview

Sanjay Choudhary Rohit Kumar Yamini Choudhary M. L. Kamboj Ajit kumar Suresh Kumar Abhishek Paul
Vol 9(6), 1-16

India being a tropical country faces high fly attack problems during summer season that adversely affect dairy animal health and performance. Fly attacks may compromise animal welfare and cause monetary losses due to distress suffered by the animals results in feeding disruptions and decreased milk production. Although conventional insecticides are used for flies control, but safety alarms and buildup of insecticide resistance indicate the need for alternative control strategies. Thus, to deal with the issue of insecticide resistance, many plant extracts and oils (such as Allium, Azadirachta, Cymbopogon, Eucalyptus, Pogostemon, Mentha, Ricinus) composed of bioactive compound are being exploited that can exert different modes of action and averting resistance. Use of non-host semiochemicals and kairomones baited on the traps are the other control methods that are also effective against the various fly species. Therefore, problems of various fly species can be controlled significantly with the appropriate use of botanical extracts, oils, non-host semiochemicals and kairomones, and thereby improving the overall welfare of dairy animals.

Keywords : Control Dairy Farm Flies Menaces Prevention Strategies

Dramatically decreasing in the pasturelands over the last few decades in India has resulted in increase the use of intensive management systems to maximize efficiency and production. Although these systems have allowed for greater control of certain environmental factors and still there are environmental stressors that remain a challenge for producers (West et al., 2003). Environmental stressors can negatively impact production and animal welfare, especially in situations where animals have no opportunities to avoid the stressors (Shutz et al., 2008). Attack of the pest flies are one of the stressors which has economic and welfare concern in dairy cattle production systems.  Nuisance flies are typically most active from May to October in northern regions, and are active year-round in warmer climates. Biting and nuisance flies adversely affect animal health and reduce farm profitability (Kunz et al., 1991; Jones, 2002; Taylor et al., 2012). Fly control is always a hot topic with dairy producers because there are not a lot of viable options to alleviate fly pressure. Dairy producers rely heavily on the use of synthetic chemical pesticide for prevention, control, and management of both vector and pathogen. However, this has proved to be costly and unsustainable in a number of ways (Norval et al., 1992). Therefore, use of flies-repellent plant extracts and their essential oils on the hosts and their integration with other off-host or on host flies control measures (baited fly traps) can be practical and provide economic ways of controlling not only livestock flies and ticks’ attacks but also arthropod vectors. A number of studies have shown that plant-based repellents can be comparable to N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) or even better (Trongtokit et al., 2004).  Therefore, core aim of present review is to discuss the common fly species associated with fly menaces in dairy farms, behavioural response of dairy animals, economic effects of flies on farm animals and use of natural plant based essential oils to prevent flies attack.

Common Flies of Dairy Cattle                            

There are numerous fly species which are considered to be significant pests of both free-ranging and confined cattle.

Table 1: Common characteristics and feeding areas of the flies on cows

  Horn Fly Face Fly Stable Fly Deer Fly Horse Fly
Identifying Characteristics Smaller than house fly; 3/16-inch-long Darker than house fly Smaller than house fly Smaller than horse fly, 0.2 inches long Largest in size, 0.4 to 1.3 inches long
Preferred Host Material Fresh cattle waste Fresh cattle waste Spoiled or fermenting organic material Mud or saturated vegetation in marshes or near pond or creek Mud or saturated vegetation in marshes or near pond or creek
Life Cycle 10-20 days 3 weeks 14-24 days Late spring into summer Late spring into summer
Feeding and Resting Area on Animal Back, sides and poll area of cattle Eyes, mouth and muzzle Front legs, sides, back and belly Back and belly Back and belly
Meals per Day 20-30 times per fly per day 2-3 times a day and remain 2-5 minutes Feed only during the day and during feeding only 10-30 times per fly per day for 5 min  
Dangerous (Flies/Head) 200 to 250 12 to 14 5 20 to 30 20 to 30
References Cortinas and Jones, (2006); Foil and Hogsette, (1994) Van Geem and Broce, (1985); Cortinas and Jones, (2006); Cortinas and Jones, (2006); Taylor et al., (2007) Cortinas and Jones, (2006) Iranpour and Galloway, (2002); Cortinas and Jones, (2006)

About 20 families of flies are of veterinary importance which are characterized into blood-sucking or biting flies, such as horn flies (Haematobia irritans), stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans), horse flies (Tabanus sp.) and deer flies (Chrysops sp.) (Cortinas and Jones, 2006), and non-blood sucking flies like face flies (Musca autumnalis), house flies (Musca domestica) (Kumar et al., 2011), cattle grubs and the larva of heel flies (gadflies) (Hypoderma lineatum, and Hypoderma bovis). Common characteristics and feeding areas of the flies on cows are given in the Table 1.

Host-Finding Behaviour and Feeding Habits of Flies

In order to design effective fly control strategy, it is essential to know identification of host by flies. Abundance of pest fly can vary greatly on individual animals, even among cattle within the same herd that are located in close proximity to each other (Birkett et al., 2004). Flies are suspected to use specific cues to identify their potential vertebrate’s host, by using combination of visual, thermal and olfactory cues (Birkett et al., 2004; Tangtrakulwanich et al., 2011; Kamut and Jezierski, 2014). They use visual signals for flight orientation and as a long-distance attractant. Several flies such as black, horse, deer and horn flies have more preference towards dark colors like black, blue, purple and pink as compared to white, yellow or green colors (Khan and Kozub, 1985; Horváth et al., 2010; Blaho et al., 2012). Similarly, various dipteran species belonging to the families Tabanidae, Muscidae and Simuliidae found more attractive to darker colors than light colors (Duncan and Vigne, 1979; Khan and Kozub, 1985; Rutberg, 1987; Horvath et al., 2010). Horváth et al. (2008, 2010) observed coat colors and found that the difference in attraction is due to their polarizing properties. The different coat colors polarize light at different angles, producing different images to animals and insects that can detect polarized light (Horváth et al., 2008). However, odor appears to play a critical role for shorter distance orientation and for eventual contact and landing (Zhu et al., 2015). Birkett et al. (2004) used field and laboratory tests to show that the natural differential attractiveness of dairy heifers to pest flies was partly due to volatile semiochemicals emitted by cattle. Variation in carbon dioxide production was likely to found potent individual cattle fly attraction factor (Torr et al., 2006). Furthermore, various workers have reported that attractiveness of flies also depend upon the sex and breed of the animals (Khan and Kozub 1985, Rutberg 1987, Wollard and Bullock 1987, Braverman 1989, Rubenstein and Hohmann 1989, Hallamaa 2009) i.e. flies are more attracted towards the male animals as compared to females as because of their high testosterone hormone secretion (Newport, 2016).

Behavioural Responses of Dairy Cattle to Pest Flies

Dairy animals have developed numerous types of fly avoidance behaviours which expend valuable energy and disturb the daily routine behaviours including feeding and resting behaviour (Dougherty et al., 1993). The fly avoidance behaviours are explained here after:

Tail Flicking

Most frequent and common fly avoidance behaviour observed in cattle is tail flicking (Dougherty et al., 1993b). Ralley et al. (1993) describe tail flicking as a movement of tail to the animal’s side or back which is effective in eliminating flies located on the animal’s sides, back, and rear legs.

Skin Twitching

Skin twitching is the second most frequently used avoidance behaviour, which is less energy intensive for fly avoidance activity (Mullens et al., 2006). Blight et al. (1990) observed that skin twitching is an involuntary reaction to irritation on the animal’s skin. Muscles under the skin of cattle and other quadrupeds known as cutaneous trunci muscles, automatically contract in response to stimulus commonly referred to as the panniculus reflex or cutaneous trunci reflex.

Head Throwing

Head throwing behaviour is more energy intensive and less frequently used act performed by the cattle for fly avoidance (Mullens et al., 2006). During head throwing, animal moves its head with a high energy towards either the side or front legs (Ralley et al., 1993).

Leg Stamping

Leg stamping is a fly associated behaviour which is performed against flies which prefer feeding on the legs i.e. stable flies (Dougherty et al., 1993b, c; Ralley et al., 1993). During this behaviour animal stamp foot on the ground in an order to dislodge biting flies (Dougherty et al., 1993b, c).

Group Bunching

Grouping of several animals together i.e. aggregation behaviour of entire herd in an effort to prevent fly attack (Berry et al., 1983; Wieman et al., 1992; Ralley et al., 1993). Schmidtmann and Valla, 1982; Ralley et al., 1993 reported that the animals in the middle of the bunch are subjected to fewer flies than those more exposed on the exterior of the bunch. Ralley et al. (1993) found that cattle performed the bunching behaviour in response to horse flies but did not perform the behaviour in response to stable flies and mosquitoes.

 Economic Effects of Fly Harassment

The flies cause damage to livestock either directly as parasites and pests, or indirectly as vectors of disease as given in Table 2. The nature of damage depends on the type of fly’s mouth parts like blood sucking flies equipped with a mouthpart that can slash through skin and blood vessels (Cortinas and Jones, 2006) and in response animals bunch together for protection which may cause them to stop feeding. This activity causes weight loss and reduced milk flow, and the huddled animals often injure each other by hooking or kicking while they are close together for defense as in case of Stable flies which are aggressive feeders that inflict a painful bite. Stable flies cause significant “fly worry” in cattle, causing them to spend energy in avoidance behaviors such as foot stamping and tail switching (Taylor et al., 2012). Cortinas and Jones, (2006) found that the biting mechanism of stable, horse and deer flies are presumed to be extremely painful as their mouthparts tear through skin and blood vessels for a meal. Anti-thrombosis components from horse and deer fly saliva prevent the wound from rapidly clotting and attract other flies to the site such as house and face flies (Kazimírová et al., 2001; Cortinas and Jones, 2006). Perich et al. (1986) observed that heifers exposed to an average of 90 horse flies per day had a 0.1 kg reduction in weight gain per day.

Table 2: Diseases transmitted by flies

Fly Mechanical Vectors References
Horn fly Bovine anaplasmosis, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, mastitis-causing agent, Staphylococcus aureus (Gillespie et al., 1999);  (Spier et al., 2004); (Rodriguez et al., 2009)
Face fly Moraxella bovis (bovine pink-eye), bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), nematode eye worm, Thelasia sp., (Berkebile et al., 1981); (Glass and Gerhardt, 1984); (Postma et al., 2008)
Stable fly West Nile Virus, bovine leukosis and anaplasmosis (Weber et al., 1988);(Scoles et al., 2005); (Doyle et al., 2011)
House fly Anthrax (Iqbal et al. 2014)
Horse and Deer fly Bovine leukemia virus, bovine anaplasmosis, Lyme disease, Trypanosomes and helminths (Hawkins et al., 1982);(Magnarelli et al., 1986); (Foil, 1989);(Iranpour and Galloway, 2002)

Similarly, Altunsoy and Kilic (2012) reported weight gains in cattle may be reduced by 0.1 kg per day when the animal attacked daily by approximately 66 individuals of blood-sucking tabanids insects. Various worker further estimated that attacks by dipteran flies can reduce cattle weight gains by up to 18% per year during fly season (Steelman et al., 1993; Dougherty et al., 1993; Sykes, 1994). This reduced feed intake and increased stress or cortisol level further reducing milk production by 20 to 30 percent (Steelman et al., 1991; Byford et al., 1992; Jonsson and Mayer, 1999; Khan et al., 2000; Malik et al., 2007). Similarly, Gerry et al. (2007) reported decrease in milk production by cows of up to 1.49 kg per day when attacked by stable flies. Decreased milk production in lactating females has negative consequences for offspring development (Sykes 1994; Mullens et al., 2006; Gerry et al., 2007; Taylor et al., 2012). The indirect damage caused by flies may be due to various livestock disease caused by vectors in two ways, viz. through contact and biologically. In the mechanical way flies spread disease-producing organism through contact i.e. some horse and stable flies transmit Trypanosomiasis and Anthrax mechanically from the diseased to healthy animals while feeding on their blood (Weber et al., 1988; Iranpour and Galloway, 2002; Scoles et al., 2005; Doyle et al., 2011). However, in case of biological way, flies transmit the causative organisms that develop or multiply itself inside the fly vector to infect the animals (Foil, 1989; Iranpour and Galloway, 2002).

Ananda et al. (2009) reported that ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) are the major constraints on profitable live­stock production and productivity worldwide, as these may cause death, decreased productivity, low­ered working efficiency (Uilenberg, 1995), and increased cost for control measures (Makala et al., 2003). According to the FAO, (2004) around 80% of the world’s cattle population is exposed to tick infes­tation and has estimated the impact of 7.3 US $/head/ year. Earlier various workers had reviewed monetary losses occurred due to TTBD as shown in Table 3 and Narladkar (2018) estimated approximate projected economic losses by citing the examples of five states in Tables 4.

Table 3: Losses due to TTBD reviewed from the literature

Disease transmitted by Losses References Losses as on today in October 2017 $ Losses in October 2017* (1US$= 65.07 on (18.10.2017)
In India tropical theileriosis Annual loss US$ 800 million Devendra, (1995) US$1295 million          8426.7 crore
A recent estimate calculated the costs of control of TTBDs affecting Indian livestock 498.7 million US $ per annum Minjauw and McLeod, (2003) US$668.96 million          4353.0 crore
Total losses due to surra per animal in ND cow, CB cow, and buffalo ND:  3, 328.18, CB:  6, 193 and buffalo: 9,872.33 Singh et al., 2014 ND: 183.86 crore CB:  713.5 crore buffaloes: ₹11.21 crore ND:  183.86 crore, CB:  713.5 crore, buffaloes: ₹ 311.21 crore
India suffers losses due to babesiosis in livestock 57.2 million US dollars annually McLeod and Kristjanson, (1999) US$ 84.74          551.54 crore
In India alone, TTBD’s have been implicated to cause projected loss $500 million annually Ghosh et al., 2007 US$ 595.20          3873.06 crore
As per the 1997 estimates, the global production loss caused by TTBDs 13.9–18.7 billion US $ annually Castro, (1997) 21.38–28.76 billion US $ annually


Table 4: Projected economic losses due to theileriosis in CB cattle in five states of India (Narladkar, 2018)

State Reference % Prevalence Total Crossbred population Affected population Loss of milk per litre Rate of milk /liter @  38 Total loss of milk Total loss in  in crore Loss per animal in  
Gujarat Vahora et al., 2012 37 1734161 641639 127 38 81488143 309.65 1785.62
Karnataka Muraleedharan et al., 1994 17.7 2707335 479198 127 38 60858182 231.26 854.2
Kerala Nair et al., 2011 16 1115375 178460 127 38 22664420 86.12 772.16
Tamil Nadu Velusamy et al., 2014 13 5467646 710794 127 38 90270838 343.02 627.38
Uttarakhand Kohli et al., 2014 45.4 416977 189307 127 38 24042058 91.35 2191

Control and Management of Pest Flies

Synthetic insecticides formulated as dusts, sprays, pour-on, feed additives, and insecticide impregnated ear tag were mostly used and relievable management tool against pest flies over the last five decades (Butler and Okine, 1999). Concerns over growing insect resistance to conventional treatments because of the over-reliance on insecticides of the same or similar mode of action, environmental and health impacts, (Hogsette et al., 1991; Foil and Hogsette, 1994; Foil et al., 2010; Pitzer et al., 2010) and a lack of new active compounds for insecticides have also created a need for new and unique strategies for pest management (Wall, 2012). Recently, people are focusing towards the organic dairy production and there are no registered pesticides available to use, leaving organic herds particularly vulnerable to high pest fly levels. Therefore, use of organic pesticide (essential oils) (Hieu et al., 2010; Geden, 2012) and mechanical fly repellents (Denning et al., 2014) as an alternative way for natural and effective control of fly’s menaces are getting attention with encouraging results.

Insecticidal Plants and their Essential Oil

Natural plant extracts and essential oils are volatile substances found in a wide variety aromatic plants species and have been used as fragrances and flavors and their terpenoid compounds are natural insecticides (Isman, 2006). Plant extracts are obtained using a variety of solvents and techniques, these plants extract have various bioactive compounds such as: nitrogen compounds (e.g., alkaloids), terpenoids, phenolics, proteinase inhibitors, and growth regulators which have pest repelling activity (Tiwari et al., 2011). Various researcher studied the bioassays using exposed human hand and dairy cattle to house flies, stable flies and horn flies where they found that combination of mixtures of essential oils effectively repelled flies (Hieu et al., 2010; Baldacchino et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2012). Table 5 summarizes some studies dealing with the use of various plant oils or components against various flies.

Essential Oils and Other Bioactive Aspects of Plants are Described here-


Allium sativum L. is a widely grown crop that has been reported to have insecticidal and repellent properties against some pests (Showler et al., 2010; 2011). Asmaa et al. (2016) studied the effect of combined treatment of garlic-based formula, pour on animal and organic spray around their environment and found significant reduction in the fly count (42.6 and 47.9%, respectively) when sprayed once a week. Similarly, Massariol et al. (2011) reported that when cattle were fed garlic at 100 g/cow for 3 d, no repellent or toxic effects observed against horn flies and stable flies.


Azadirachta indica A. Juss, famously known as Neem, native to the Indian subcontinent (Khater, 2012). Neem contain the active compound azadirachtin, a nortriterpenoid (a type of limonoid), that acts by disturbing endocrine activity, the down regulation of hemolymph ecdysteroid levels that block release of prothoracicotropic hormone or delay ecdysteroid production, an action which inhibits molting and malformation result in mortality in insects (Kraus et al., 1985; Khater , 2012). It has been reported that neem and its bioactive compound has antifeedant and deterrent effects against some herbivorous insects (Redfern et al., 1981; Rice et al., 1985; Showler et al., 2004; Greenberg et al., 2005). Although neem has various other bioactive compounds include salannin, salannol, salannolacetate, nimbinen, gedunin, dirachtin, nimbolide, and viselinin derivatives (Jones et al., 1989; Walter, 1999). Neem has been applied against pests as extracts, oil, cakes, and leaves (Schmutterer ,1988, 1990; Showler et al., 2004).

Table 5: Plant essential oils that shown repellency to flies

Scientific Name Common Name Insect Result References
Acorus calamus L. Calamus House fly 80.95% (2h), (Singh and Singh, 1991)
82.92% (5h)
Ageratum sp. Whiteweed House fly 67.44% (2h), (Singh and Singh, 1991)
56.10% (5h)
Cyprus scariosus R. Br. Cypriol House fly 83.33% (2h), (Singh and Singh, 1991)
68.29% (5h)
Cymbopogon flexuosus Lemongrass House fly 33.33%(2h), (Singh and Singh, 1991)
33.33% (5h)
Cinnamomum tamala Indian bay leaf House fly 88.10% (2h), (Singh and Singh 1991)
87.81% (5h)
Cinnamomum Verum Oil of cinnamon


Larva LC50: 159 ppm R (%) b: 77.9; OD(%)c: 60.0; Contact (larva) (Morey and Khandagle, 2012)
Adult of stable flies Repellency Oviposition deterrent
Nepeta cataria Catnip House fly Significant repellent activity at 20 and 2mg (Zhu et al., 2009)
Nepeta cataria Catnip Stable fly Significant repellent activity at 20 mg Zhu et al., 2009
Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum House fly PR1: 11.250% Elbermawy et al., 2011)
Eugenia coryophyllus Clove (leaf) House fly 80.68% (24h) (Chintalchere et al., 2013)
Ocimum basilicum L. Basil Horn fly Significant repellentv activity during 24 hours (Lachance and Grange, 2014)
Eugenia caryophyllata Thunberg Clove (bud) Stable fly PT2: 3.50 hours (0.5 mg/cm2) PT2: 1.20 hours (0.25 mg/cm2) Hieu et al., 2010)
Eugenia caryophyllata Thunberg Clove (leaf) Stable fly PT2: 3.25 hours (0.5 mg/cm2) PT2: 1.17 hours (0.25 mg/cm2) (Hieu et al., 2010)
Santalum album L. Sandalwood Stable fly PT2: 0.27 hours (0.5 mg/cm2) (Hieu et al., 2010)
Cymbopogon nardus (L.) Rendle Citronella Stable fly PT2: 0.26 hours (0.5mg/cm2) (Hieu et al., 2010)
Rosmarinus officinalis L. Rosemary Stable fly PT2: 0.21 hours (0.5 mg/cm2) (Hieu et al., 2010)
Eucalyptus globules Labillardie´ re Eucalyptus Stable fly PT2: 0.13 hours (0.5 mg/cm2) (Hieu et al., 2010)
Mentha piperita Peppermint House fly Significantly repelled flies for 6- and 3-days posttreatments (Khater et al.,2009)
 Mentha piperita Oil of peppermint House and stable flies Number of flies on one side of pastured cows: 9.3 (Lachance and Grange, 2014)
Allium cepa Onion House fly Significantly repelled flies for 6- and 3-days posttreatments (Khater et al.,2009)
  1. Percentage of Repellency= [(Nc-Nt)/(Nc+Nt)]100
  2. Protection Time


Cymbopogon citratus, is an aromatic, evergreen, clump-forming, perennial grass native to tropical Asia, but it is also grown in many temperate and tropical areas of the world (Kazembe and Chauruka, 2012). Lemongrass extract contain the monoterpene citral bioactive agent which have insecticidal activity. The essential oil of the lemongrass leaf is primarily composed of citral a and b (78%) and myrcene and limonene (10%); (Paranagama et al., 2002), but the acyclic monoterpenoid components citronella and citronellal have repellent properties against some insects (Bartlett, 1985). Milian (2009) observed the effect of lemongrass extract (ethanol) applied topically on the cattle in a 1:125 aqueous dilution and found that 100% repellency for 30 min, 95% for 12 h, 98% for 24 h, 97% for 48 h, 98% for 5 d, 95% for 10 d, and 69% for up to 15 d post treatment. Barnard (2000) observed the effect of citronella, a constituent of lemongrass against the stable flies and reported that repellency property of the lemongrass was as effect as N, N-diethyl-metatoluamide (DEET). Similarly, Essential oil of lemongrass at 5% each in sunflower oil repelled horn flies from treated areas on pastured and barn-held cows for>6 and 8 h, respectively (Lachance and Grange, 2014).


Eucalyptus, large genus (with>600 described species) mostly very large trees, of the myrtle family (Myrtaceae), native to Australia, Tasmania, and nearby island and now eucalyptus trees are extensively grown in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions worldwide (Moura et al., 2012). Juan et al. (2011). Eucalyptus oil contains various active ingredients including 1,8-cineole, a-pinene, a-terpineol, 4-terpineol, and p-cymene that are toxic to various flies. Essential oil of E. polybractea had the highest knockdown activity of 50% at 3.4 min in an enclosed chamber, and a significant correlation was detected between the content of 1,8-cineole in the Eucalyptus species and toxicity to horn flies (Juan et al., 2011).


Patchouli, Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth (Lamiaceae), is a bushy herb native to tropical Asia with more widespread cultivation. A dosage of 0.5 mg/cm2 provided 3.67 h of protection from stable flies when treated human hands were used as a biting substrate, but DEET gave 4.47 h of protection (Hieu et al., 2010). When tamanu nut oil (with a protection time of 0.56 h) was added to patchouli oil, protection increased to match that of DEET (Hieu et al., 2010).


Castorbean, is a Euphorbiaceae family plant, Ricinus communis L. is native to Africa and parts of southern Asia, but it has spread into many tropical and temperate areas of both the Western and Eastern hemispheres (Rana et al., 2012). Castorbean contains ricin which is notably toxic and (Wedin et al., 1986), castor oil used at a rate of 473 ml on camels had no effect against stable flies, but 1,892 ml per camel prevented stable flies from landing on and biting camels for 3 d (Cross, 1917).

Cinnamomum, Mentha, Matricaria and Allium

Cinnamomum camphora (Lauraceae) is native to China, Taiwan, and Japan, and it is grown commercially for its essential oil (Frizzo et al., 2000). Khater et al. (2009) observed the effect of camphor oil on water buffaloes when applied at 1.4 ml/kg body weight to the backline and found that stable flies were repelled for 6 d. Similarly, dosages of 3.6 ml/kg body weight of peppermint, Mentha piperita (Ehrh.) Briq. (Lamiaceae); 3.4 ml/kg body weight of chamomile, Matricaria chamomilla (L.) Rydb. (Asteraceae); and 2.9 ml/kg body weight of onion, Allium cepa L. (Amaryllidaceae), each repelled stable flies for 6 d (Khater et al., 2009). Lachance and Grange (2014) applied the essential oil of peppermint at 5% mixed with sunflower oil on pastured and barn-held cows and observed that horn flies were repelled from the treated areas for more than 6 to 8 h, respectively.


Schmidtmann (1991) observed that sawdust of the pine reduces larval stable fly population by 46-91 % when used as the livestock bedding material. Pine sawdust might be useful for managing stable fly populations on dairies, but further testing to assess pine species, grades, and quantities of sawdust is needed to ascertain the best for achieving moderate- to long-term repellency.

Non-Host Odor and Semiochemicals

It is a novel approach for the control of flies using host-oriented behavior of disease vectors (mosquitoes, ticks and tsetse flies) which not only dependent on kairomones from preferred vertebrate hosts but also avoid unsuitable or un-preferred animals by means of distinct chemical odors (Fernandez et al., 2015). Various workers analyzed by combined gas chromatography and electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) analysis that straight chain carboxylic acids, ketones, phenols and a lactone, δ- talactone etc. are effective non-host repellent compounds which can be used in control of flies (Gikonyo et al., 2000; Saini et al., 2014; Bett et al., 2015). Flies use semiochemical to recognize host location and these can also be used as non-host order to repel the pest flies (Hall et al., 1984; Hassanali et al., 1986; Bursell et al., 1988; Gikonyo et al., 2002). Traps baited with semiochemical (1-octen-3-ol) a component of ruminant breath, were reported to increase catches of Stomoxys spp. (Holloway & Phelps, 1991; Mihok et al., 1995). Hall et al., 1984 reported that 1-Octen-3-ol, a known element of ruminant breath, is an attractant for tsetse flies. Similarly, Hassanali et al. (1986) and Bursell et al. (1988) found that some semiochemicals such as phenol, m-cresol and p-cresol are released from cattle urine through microbial degradation, and also influence tsetse fly behaviour. Mixtures including some of these chemicals, when released in a specific ratio, have been used successfully in the field to trap tsetse fly populations (Vale et al., 1986, 1988; Torr et al., 1995). Zhu et al. (2015) developed a less expensive and more efficacious trap based upon a white panel with the option to add visual and olfactory stimuli (Baited with phenol, m-cresol or p-cresol) for enhanced stable fly trapping and found that white panel traps caught twice as many stable flies than Alsynite traps. Baiting the traps with synthetic manure volatiles increased catches 2–3-fold.

Other Natural Remedies to Keep Flies Away from Cattle

Home-made Herbal Mixture

We can create an effective herbal mixture and tie it on the cows to keep the flies away (Ingredients needed – RAW turmeric, neem oil, vacha root (vayampe), charcoal – coconut shell is preferred). Grind all the above into a mixture, add neem oil and make a paste. Then roll it in a coconut leaf ball or some other porous material and tie it on your cows. Small variety of vacha (vayampe) should be preferred and not the bigger variety which is commercially available in ayurvedic stores nowadays. If vacha is in dried form, soak it in water before grinding. This mixture is very effective in keeping flies away for more than a month (Natural farmer 2013).

Soothika Marun enna

The oil left after preparing the soothika marun (medicine) can be stored for a few years and can be liberally applied on any fly bite areas. It is also very effective in keeping flies away. It is also good for worm or bacteria bites normally caused during monsoon (soothika marun is a special medicine given to lactating mothers – similar to chavanprayash, very effective for lactating mothers, it is extremely effective for back pain and other issues related to women health post pregnancy and overall health) (Natural farmer, 2013).


Fly infestation can have detrimental effects on welfare and behaviour, daily activity, health and productivity of dairy animals by causing chronic irritation and pain through biting. Animals use various behaviour strategies e.g. individual (tail swishing, head shaking, leg lifting) and social protective behavior (form larger groups or temporary aggregations) to protect themselves against insects attacks. From this study it may be concluded that use of plant extract and their essential oils are the effective fly control measures which can be used either single or in combination with other preventing measures.


  1. Asmaa, N.M., Naglaa, M., Azeem, A. & Gehen, K.A.L. (2016). Field trial using combined treatment of garlic and organic spray formula for flie’s control and animal defensive behavior alleviation in cattle farm, Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 10, 280-289.
  2. Altunsoy, F. & Kilic, A.Y. (2012). Seasonal abundance of horse fly (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Western Anatolia, Journal of the Entomological Research Society, 14, 95-105.
  3. Ananda, K.J., D’Souza, P.E. & Puttalakshmamma, G.C. (2009). Prevalence of haemoprotozoan diseases in crossbred cattle in Bangalore north, World, 2(1), 15-16.
  4. Bartlett, C. (1985). An olfactometer for measuring the repellent effect of chemicals on the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans, Pest Management Science 16, 479–487.
  5. Barnard, D.R. (2000). Global collaboration for development of pesticides for public health: Repellents and toxicants for personal protection. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  6. Butler, J.F. & Okine, J.S. (1999). The horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.): Review of programs on natural history and control. Pages 625–646 in Contributions to the Knowledge of Diptera. J. Burger,ed. Association Publishers, Gainesville, FL.
  7. Uilenberg, G. (1995). International collaborative research: Significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health, Parasitol, 57, 19-41.
  8. Makala, L.H., Mangani, P., Fujisaki, K. & Nagasawa, H. (2003). The current status of major tick-borne diseases in Zambia, Res., 34, 27-45.
  9. Berry, I., Stage, D.A. & Campbell, J.B. (1983). Populations and economic impacts of stable flies on cattle, Am. Soc. Ag. Eng., 26, 873–877.
  10. Birkett, M.A., Agelopoulos, N., Jensen, K.M.V., Jespersen, J. B., Pickett, J. A., Prijs, H. J., Thomas, G., Trapman, J.J., Wadhams, L.J. & Woodcock, C.M. (2004). The role of volatile semiochemicals in mediating host location and selection by nuisance and disease-transmitting cattle flies, Vet. Entomol., 18, 313-322.
  11. Blaho, M., Egri, A., Bahidszki, L., Kriska, G., Hegedus, R., Akesson, S. & Horvath, G. (2012). Spottier targets are less attractive to Tabanid flies: On the Tabanid-repellency of spotty fur patterns, PLOS one, 7, e41138.
  12. Chintalchere, J., Lakare, S. & Pandit. R. (2013). Bioefficacy of essential oils of thymus vulgaris and eugenia caryophyllus against housefly, Musca domestica l, The Bioscan, 8: 1029-1034.
  13. Cortinas, R. & Jones, C.J. (2006). Ectoparasites of cattle and small ruminants. Clin. Food Anim, 22, 673-693.
  14. Cross, H.E. (1917). Experiments with emulsions for protecting camels against the attacks of blood-sucking flies. Bull., Calcutta Superintendent Government Printing, Calcutta, India.
  15. Devendra, C. (1995). In Global Agenda for Livestock Research. EDS, ILRI, Nairobi. p41-48.
  16. Denning, S.S., Washburn, S.P., & Watson, D.W. (2014). Development of a novel walk-through fly trap for the control of horn flies and other pests on pastured dairy cows, Dairy Sci. 97, 4624–4631
  17. De Castro, J.J. (1997). Sustainable tick- and tick-borne disease control in livestock improvement in developing countries, Parasitol, 71, 77-97.
  18. Dougherty, C.T., Knapp, F.W., Burrus, P.B., Willis, D.C., Cornelius, P.L. & Bradley, N.W. (1993b). Multiple releases of stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans L.) and behaviour of grazing beef cattle, Anim. Behav. Sci., 38, 191-212.
  19. Duncan, P. & Vigne, N. (1979). The effect of group size in horses on the rate of attacks by bloodsucking flies. Animal Behaviour, 44,
  20. Elbermawy, S.M., Elkattan, N.A., Ahmed, K.S. & Abdel-Gawad, R.M. (2011). Screening for bioactive plant materials against house fly, Musca domestica(diptera: Muscidae, Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology, 5, 45-51.
  21. Frizzo, C. D., Santos, A.C., Paroul, N., Serafini, L. A., Dellacasa, E., Lorenzo, D. & Moyna, P. (2000). Essential oils of camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora Nees & Eberm) cultivated in southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 43: doi: 10.1590/51516-89132.
  22. Foil, L.D. & Hogsette, J.A. (1994). Biology and control of tabanids, stable flies and horn flies, sci. tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 13, 1125-1158.
  23. Foil, L.D., Guerrero, F.D. & Bendele, K.G. (2010). Detection of target site resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphates in the horn fly using multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Med. Entomol., 47, 855–861.
  24. (2004) Ticks: Acaricide resistance, diagnosis, man¬agement and prevention. In: Resistance Management and Integrated Parasite Control in Ruminants: Guidelines Module 1. Animal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. p25-77.
  25. Gerry A.C., Peterson N.G. & Mullens B.A. (2007). Predicting and controlling stable fly on California dairies. ANR Publication 8258.
  26. Geden, C.J. (2012). Status of biopesticides for control of house flies. Biopest., 5, 1-11.
  27. Ghosh, S., Azhahianambi, P. & Yadav, M.P. (2007) Upcoming and future strategies of tick control: A review. Vector Dis., 44, 79-89.
  28. Greenberg, S.M., Showler, A.T. & Liu, T.X. (2005). Effects of neem-based insecticides on beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Pest Science, 12, 17–23.
  29. Saini, R.K., Hassanali, A. (2014). Repellent compositions for insects and other arthropods. 2014; Patent Application: KE 771, PCT/KE/2014/000037, KE/P/2013/001888, US15/016,303.
  30. Bett, M.K., Saini, R.K. & Hassanali, A. (2015). Repellency of tsetse-refractory waterbuck (Kobus defassa) body odor to Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae): Assessment of relative contribution of different classes and individual constituents. Acta Trop. 2015;17±24; doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.02.017
  31. Gikonyo, N.K., Hassanali, A., Njagi, P.G.N. & Saini, R.K. (2000). Behaviour of Glossina morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae) on waterbuck Kobus defassa Ruppel and feeding membranes smeared with waterbuck sebum indicates the presence of allomones. Acta Trop, 77, 295-303.
  32. Iranpour, M. & Galloway, T.D. (2002). Chrysops, Hybomitra and Tabanus spp., horse and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae). Biological Control Programmes in Canada (ed. By P. G. Mason and J. T. Huber). Pp. 132-135. CABI Publishing, Lethbridge, AB.
  33. Horvath, G., Majer, J., Horvath, L., Sziva, I. & Kriska, G. (2008). Ventral polarization vision in tabanids: horseflies and deerflies (Diptera: Tabanidae) are attracted to horizontally polarized light. Naturwissenschafte, 95,1093-1100.
  34. Horvath, G., Blaho, M., Kriska, G., Hegedus, R., Gerics, B., Farkas, R. & Akesson, S. (2010). An unexpected advantage of whiteness in horses: the most horsefly-proof horse has a depolarizing white coat. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Retrieved from DOI;10.1098/rspb.2009.2202.
  35. Hogsette, J.A., Prichard, D.L. & Ruff, J.P. (1991). Economic effects of horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae) populations on beef cattle exposed to three pesticide treatment regimes, Econ. Entomol., 84, 1270–1274.
  36. Hieu, T.T., Kim, S.I., Lee, S.G. & Ahn, Y.J. (2010b). Repellency to Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) of plant essential oils alone or in combination with Calophyllum inophyllum oil, Journal of Medical Entomology, 47, 575–580.
  37. Jones, P.S., Ley, S.V., Morgen, E.E. & Santafianos, D. (1989). The chemistry of the neem tree, pp. 19–45. In M. Jacobson (ed.), Focus on phytochemical pesticides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  38. Juan, L.W., Lucia, A., Zerba, E.N., Harrand, L., Marco, M. & Masuh, H.M. (2011). Chemical composition and fumigant toxicity of the essential oils from 16 species of Eucalyptus against Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae) adults. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104, 1087–1092.
  39. Kamut, M. & Jezierski, T. (2014). Ecological, behavioural and economic effects of insects on grazing farm animals – a review, Animal Science Papers and Reports vol. 32 (2014) no. 2, 107-119.
  40. Khater, H.F. (2012). Prospects of botanical biopesticides in insect pest management. Pharmacologia, 3, 641–656.
  41. Khater, H.F., Ramadan, M.Y. & El-Madawy, S. (2009). The lousicidal, ovicidal, and repellent efficacy of some essential oils against lice and flies infesting water buffaloes in Egypt, Veterinary Parasitology, 64, 257–266.
  42. Kohli, S., Atheya, U.K. & Thapliyal, A. (2014). Prevalence of theileriosis in cross-bred cattle: Its detection through blood smear examination and polymerase chain reaction in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, India, World, 7, 168-171.
  43. Khan M.A. & Kozub G.C. (1985). Response of angus, charolais, and hereford bulls to black flies (Simulium spp.), with and without phosmet treatment, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 65, 269-272.
  44. Khan, M. F. & Ahmed, S. M. (2000). Toxicity of crude neem leaf extract against housefly Musca domestica Adults as compared with ddvp, dichlorvos, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 24, 219-224.
  45. Kraus, W., Bokel, M., Klenk, A. & Pohl, H. (1985). The structure of azadirachtin and 22, 23-dihydro-23B-methoxyazadirachtin. Tetrahedron Letters, 26, 6435–6438.
  46. Kumar, P., Mishra, S., Malik, A. & Satya, S. (2011). Repellent, larvicidal and pupicidal properties of essential oils and their formulations against the housefly, Musca domestica, Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 25, 302–310.
  47. Lachance, S. & Grange, F. (2014). Repellency effectiveness of seven plant essential oils, sunflower oil and natural insecticides against horn flies on pastured dairy cows and heifers. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 28, 193–200.
  48. McLeod, R. & Kristjanson, P. (1999). Tick Cost: Economic Impact of Ticks and TBD to Livestock in Africa, Asia and Australia. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya, Retrieved from:;
  49. Malik, A., Singh, N. & Satya, S. (2007). House fly (Musca domestica): A review of control strategies for a challenging pest. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B Pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes, 42, 453-469.
  50. Massariol, P.B., Olivo, C.J., Richards, N., Agnolin, C.A., Meinerz, G. R. Both, J. F., Faccio, L., Hohenreuther, F. & Martinelli, S. (2011). Ectoparasite load alteration in Holstein cows fed with different garlic (Allium sativum L.) levels, Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 11, 37–42.
  51. Milian, C.A.F. (2009). Evaluacıon delefecto repelente delte´ de limon (Cymbopogon citratus) utilizado a diferentes diluciones contralamosca los cuernos (Haematobia irritans) en Ganado bovino de doble prop_osito durante el mes de entere de 2008 en salam_a, Baja Verapaz. Thesis Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Excuela de Medicina Veterinaria Guatemala.
  52. Minjauw, B. & McLeod, A. (2003). Tick-borne diseases and poverty. The impact of ticks and tick borne diseases on the livelihood of small-scale and marginal livestock owners in India and eastern and southern Africa. Research Report, DFID Animal Health Programme, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK. Retrieved from: RLAHTickBornBook.pdf.
  53. Morey, R.A. & Khandagle, A.J. (2012). Bioefficacy of essential oils of medicinal plants against housefly, Musca domestica Parasitology Research, 111, 1799-1805.
  54. Muraleedharan, K., Ziauddin, K.S., Hussain, P.M., Seshadri, S.J., Mallika, A.G.B. & Puttabyatappa, B. (1994). Observations on theilerial infection of cattle in project area of Mysore cooperative milk producer’s union, Karnataka state, Cheiron, 23, 130-139.
  55. Moura, J.C.M.S., Ara_ujo, P., dos Santos Brito, M., Souza, U.R, Viana, J.O.F. & Mazzafera, P. (2012). Validation of reference genes from Eucalyptus spp. Under different stress conditions. BMC Res. Notes, 5, 634–644.
  56. Mullens, B.A., Lii, K.S., Mao, Y., Meyer, J.A., Peterson N.G. & Szijj, C.E. (2006). Behavioural responses of dairy cattle to the stable fly, Stomoxys calcitrans, in an open field environment. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 20, 122-137
  57. Rutberg, A.T. (1987). Horse fly harassment and the social behavior of feral ponies. Ethology, 75, 145-154.
  58. Nair, A.S., Ravindran, R., Lakshmanan, B., Kumar, S.S., Tresamol, P.V., Saseendranath, M.R., Senthilvel, K., Rao, J.R., Tewari, A.K. & Ghosh, S. (2011). Haemoprotozoan of cattle in Northern Kerala, India, Biomed., 28, 68-75.
  59. Narladkar, B.W. (2018). Projected economic losses due to vector and vector-borne parasitic diseases in livestock of India and its significance in implementing the concept of integrated practices for vector management, Veterinary World, 11(2), 151-160.
  60. Natural farmers Kerala, (2013). Control of flies and other pest using cow dung cake smoke., accessed on Tuesday, March 5, 2019
  61. Paranagama, P. A., Adhikari, A.A.C.K., Abeywickrama, K.P. & Bandara, K.A.N.P. (2002). Toxicity and repellent activity of Cymbopogon citratus (D.C.) Stapf. and Murraya koenigii Sprang against Callosobruchus maculates (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, 5, 22–28.
  62. Pitzer, J.B., Kaufman, P.E. & Tenbroeck, S.H. (2010). Assessing permethrin resistance in the stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) in Florida by using laboratory selections and field evaluations, Econ. Entomol. 103, 2258–2263.
  63. Rana, M., Dhamija, H., Prashar, B. & Sharma, S. (2012). Ricinus communis LA review. International Journal PharmTech Research, 4, 1706–1711
  64. Redfern, R.E., Warthen, J. D., Uebel, E.C. & Mills, G.D. (1981). The antifeedant and growth-disrupting effects of azadirachtin on Spodoptera frugiperda and Oncopeltus fasciatus, pp. 129–136. In H. Schmutterer, K.R.S. Ascher, and H. Rembold (eds.), Natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), Eschborn, Germany.
  65. Rice, M. J., Sexton, S & Esmail, A.M. (1985). Antifeedant physiochemical blocks oviposition by sheep blowfly. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 24,
  66. Singh, D., Kumar, S., Singh, B. & Bardhan, D. (2014). Economic losses due to important diseases of bovines in central India. World, 7 (8), 579-585.
  67. Schmutterer, H. (1988). Potential of azadirachtin-containing pesticides for integrated pest control in developing and industrialized countries. Journal of Insect Physiology, 3, 713–719.
  68. Schmutterer, H. (1990). Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 271–297.
  69. Schmidtmann, E.T. (1991). Suppressing immature house and stable flies in outdoor calf hutches with sand, gravel, and sawdust bedding. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3956–3960.
  70. Showler, A.T., Greenberg, S. M. & Arnason, J.T. (2004). Deterrent effects of four neem-based formulations on gravid female boll weevils, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, feeding and oviposition on cotton squares. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97, 414–421.
  71. Showler, A.T., Anciso, J.R. & Castro, B.A. (2010). Effect of garlic extract on injury by cowpea curculio, Chalcodermus aeneus Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), and other pests to owpea, Vigna unguiculata L, Biopesticides International, 6, 112–120.
  72. Showler, A.T., Anciso, J.R. & Castro, B.A. (2011). Effect of garlic extract on selected pests and yield of bell pepper, Capsicum annuum L. (var. Capistrano), Biopesticides International, 6, 36–44
  73. Steelman, C.D., Gbur, E.E., Tolley, G. & Brown Jr, A.H. (1993). Variation in population density of the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, among selected breeds of beef cattle, Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 10, 97-106.
  74. Sykes, A.R. (1994). Parasitism and production in farm animals. Animal Production, 59, 155-172
  75. Tangtrakulwanich, K., Chen, H, Baxendale, F., Brewer, G. & Zhu, J.J. (2011). Characterization of olfactory sensilla of Stomoxys calcitrans and electrophysiological responses to odorant compounds associated with hosts and oviposition media, Vet. Entomol, 25, 327-336.
  76. Torr, S.J., Mangwiro, T.N.C. & Hall, D.R. (2006). The effects of host physiology on the attraction of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) and Stomoxys (Diptera: Muscidae) to cattle. Res., 96, 71-84.
  77. Taylor, D. B., Berkebile, D.R. & Scholl, P.J. (2007). Stable fly population dynamics in Eastern Nebraska in relation to climatic variables, Med. Entomol., 44, 765-771.
  78. Taylor, D.B., Moon, R.D. & Mark, D.R. (2012). Economic impact of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on dairy and beef cattle production. Journal of Medical Entomology, 49 (1), 198-209.
  79. Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, M., Kaur, G. & Kaur, H. (2011). Phytochemical screening and extraction: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1, 98–106
  80. Van Geem, T. & Broce, A.B. (1985). Significance of cattle discharges and secretions as protein sources for ovarian development in the face fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Entomol., 14, 60-64.
  81. Velusamy, R., Rani, N., Ponnudurai, G., Harikrishnan, T.J., Anna, T., Arunachalam, K., Senthilvel, K. & Anbarasi, P. (2014). Influence of season, age and breed on prevalence of haemoprotozoan diseases in cattle of Tamil Nadu, India. World, 7, 574-578.
  82. Walter, J.F. (1999). Commercial experience with neem products, pp. 155–170. In F. R. Hall and J. J. Menn (eds.), Methods in biotechnology, 5: Biopesticides. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
  83. Wedin, G. P., Neal, J.S., Everson, G.W. & Krenzelok, E.P. (1986). Castor bean poisoning, American Journal of Emergency Medicine,4, 259–261.
  84. Wieman, G.A., Campbell, J.B., DeShazer, J.A. & Berry, I.L. (1992). The effects of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and heat stress on weight gain and feed efficiency of feeder cattle, Econ. Entomol., 85, 1835–1842.
  85. T.H., Bullock, D.J. (1987). Effects of headfly (Hydrotaea irritans Fallen) infestations and repellents on ear-flicking and head-shaking behaviour of farmer Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.), Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 19, 41-49.
  86. Zhu, J.J., Zeng, X.P., Berkebile, D., Du, H.J., Tong, Y. & Qian, K. (2009). Efficacy and safety of catnip (Nepeta cataria) as a novel filth fly repellent, Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 23, 209–216.
  87. Zhu, J.J., Qing-he, Z., Taylor, D.B. & Friesen, K.A. (2015). “Visual and olfactory enhancement of stable fly trapping” Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1555.
Abstract Read : 110 Downloads : 26