Y. Ravikumar B. Ashok Kumar Reddy M. Lakshmi Namratha G. Ramesh B. Mahesh M. Lakshman Vol 9(8), 140-144 DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20190405084024
Study of occurrence of Lymphoid leucosis (LL) and Marek’s disease (MD) in chicken was taken up in Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. 2,157 birds were presented to post-mortem examination to the department; out of 2157 carcasses, 393 (18.22%) cases showed the lesions of neoplastic conditions; Out of these positive cases, 281 (13.08%) were diagnosed as MD and remaining 112 (5.20%) were LL. These conditions were diagnosed based on gross and histopathological changes. Grossly, diffused enlargement of liver, kidneys and spleen with white foci were noticed in LL; there was enlargement of liver, kidney, spleen, proventriculus and thickening of nerves in MD. Microscopically, diffuse proliferation and infiltration with uniform neoplastic lymphoblast cells were noticed in various visceral organs in LL and pleomorphic in MD.
Keywords : Chicken Gross Histopathological Studies Lymphoid Leucosis Marek’s Disease
Avian leucosis is a group of diseases of chicken comprises of lymphoid, erythroid, myeloid leucosis, Other tumours such as fibroma, haemangioma, nephroblastoma and Osteopetrosis. Avian leucosis is prevalent throughout the world. Lymphoid leucosis is the commonest neoplastic condition in chicken caused by avian leucosis virus (ALV) usually occurs between 14th to 30th week of age. Incidence is highest at about sexual maturity (Vegad and Katiyar, 2001) which induces lymphoma in chicken called Lymphoid leucosis (LL) (Pizer and Humpheries, 1989). Marek’s disease (MD) is a lymphoproliferative disease of chicken caused by MD herpes virus (MDV) and is characterized by lymphoma formation in visceral organs, muscles, skin and lesions in peripheral nerves (Calnek and Witter, 1991). These two avian neoplastic diseases are responsible for economic loss due to both mortality and depressed performance (Panda, 1983). Hence, the present study was designed to know the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of these two most important conditions based on impression smears, gross and histopathological examination.
Materials and Methods
A total of 2,157 chicken carcasses of various age groups were presented for post-mortem examination to Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science, Rajendranagar. A detailed post-mortem examination of all dead birds was performed, the gross lesions were carefully recorded. Out of 2157 carcasses, 393 (18.22%) cases showed neoplastic growths on various visceral organs like liver, spleen, kidney, heart, proventriculus. These organs were collected in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological examination. Formalin fixed tissues were washed under running tap water, dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol, cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Then 5μm thin sections were made and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) as per the standard procedures (Luna, 1968) and the prepared slides were examined under light microscope for histopathological studies.
Results and Discussion
In the present study, out of 2,157 birds presented for post-mortem examination, 393 (18.22%) cases showed the lesions of these neoplastic conditions; In these positive cases, 281 (13.08%) cases were diagnosed as Marek’s disease and remaining 112 (5.20%) were lymphoid leucosis. These conditions were diagnosed based on characteristic pictures of impression smears, gross and histopathological changes.
These findings in case of Lymphoid leucosis supported the observations of Huang et al. (2013), Sneha et al. (2017), Bhutia and Damodar Singh (2017).
Microscopic examinations of Marek’s affected livers revealed diffuse proliferation of pleomorphic lymphocytes. Lymphocytic proliferation was so extensive that the normal architecture of hepatic lobules was largely distorted (Fig. 3). In the proventriculus extensive proliferation of lymphocytes was observed in the lamina propria, submucosa and in between and outside the muscular layers (Fig. 11). In the kidney, infiltrating and proliferating lymphocytic cells destroyed the normal architechture (Fig. 7). Unusual pleomorphism due to proliferation of neoplastic cells was observed in the spleen, pancreas and intestine (Fig. 9,12 & 13). These findings supported the observations of Pappenheimer et al. (1929); Furth, (1935); Campbell (1956); Payne and Biggs (1967), Balachandran et al. (2009), Swathy et al. (2012) and Soujanya et al. (2019).
Fig.1: Diffused enlargement of liver with white foci were noticed in Lymphoid leucosis | Fig. 2: Diffused enlargement of spleen with white foci were noticed in Lymphoid leucosis | Fig.3: Diffused enlargement of kidneys with white foci were noticed in Lymphoid leucosis | Fig. 4: Enlargement of liver, kidney, spleen, proventriculus in Marek’s disease | ||
Fig. 5: Proliferation of pleomorphic lymphocytes in the liver in Mareks, H&E x10.
|
Fig. 6: Liver section showing uniform sized immature lymphoid cells in LL. H&E x40. | Fig. 7: Infiltration of pleomorphic lymphocytes and destruction of tubules in the kidney in Mareks, H&E x 10. | |||
Fig. 8: Kidney section showing diffuse infiltration of uniform lymphoid cells in interstitial spaces. In LL. H&E x40 | Fig. 9: Splenic parenchyma showing diffused infiltration of lymphoid cells in MD. H&E x 10. | Fig. 10: Spleen section showing proliferating neoplastic lymphoid cells in LL. H&Ex10. | |||
Fig. 11: Proventriculus section showing prominent lymphoid proliferation with degenerative changes in glandular epithelium in MD.HE x 10. | Fig. 12: Section of pancreas showing prominent lymphoid infitration into the interstitium with degenerative changes in the exocrine pancreatic acini and islets of langerhans in MD H&E x 10. | Fig. 13: Proliferation of lymphocytes in the mucosa and serosa of intestine in MD. H&E x10. | |||
Conclusion
LL and Marek’s infections in chicken causes development of neoplasms in various organs also induces immunosuppression. ALV can damage organs by proliferation of neoplastic tissue. Such birds are more prone to secondary infections which can further weaken the immune system (Lutticken, 1997 and Nouri et al., 2001). So, prevention and control of LL and Marek’s infections is very important to avoid huge economical losses due to mortality and decreased performance of the birds.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University (PVNRTVU), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana for providing support and necessary facilities to carry out the work.
References