NAAS Score 2019


Declaration Format

Please download DeclarationForm and submit along with manuscript.


Free counters!

Previous Next

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminths and Assessment of Associated Risk Factors in Dairy Cows from Punjab Districts, India

Abhishek Gupta N. K. Singh Harkirat Singh S. S. Rath
Vol 9(3), 192-199

A total of 1133 faecal samples were collected from dairy cows of various districts representing different agro-climatic zones of Punjab and examined for gastrointestinal helminths. Coprological examination revealed an overall prevalence of 41.22% with mean egg per gram of faeces ranging from 160.47 ± 12.94 to 202.33 ± 11.93. The parasites reported with their respective prevalences (%) were strongyles (31.60%), amphistomes (13.42%), Moniezia spp. (4.41%), Fasciola spp. (3.80%), Trichuris spp. (1.85%), Strongyloides spp. (1.59%) and Capillaria spp. (0.44%). Results of multivariate analysis showed prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths to be significantly associated with risk factors as districts, agro-climatic zones and seasons. Maximum prevalence was recorded in monsoon (43.75%) and lowest in winters (39.56%). The highest infection rate was reported from sub-mountain zone (47.82%) and Ludhiana district (52.68%). Coproculture analysis revealed the presence of larvae of Oesophagostomum, Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Chabertia, Bunostomum, Strongyloides and Nematodirus in decreasing order.

Keywords : Coproculture Dairy Cows Gastrointestinal Parasites Prevalence Punjab Risk Factors

Gastrointestinal (GI) helminth infections have been recognized as a global problem in the livestock sector and associated with huge economic losses to the dairy farmers. The losses are manifested in terms of morbidity/mortality in acute cases and reduced weight gain, feed conversion, milk production, and poor reproductive performance, particularly in chronic infections (Edosomwan and Shoyemi, 2012). Diverse agro-climatic conditions, animal husbandry practices and pasture management have been shown to influence the incidence and severity of various parasitic diseases in a particular region. Therefore, comprehensive knowledge of the epizootiology of GI parasitism is a crucial requirement for the sustainable control of helminths, as it interacts with the host under specific climatic, management and production conditions (Jittapalapong et al., 2011).

Prevalence studies on GI parasitism in cattle have been reported worldwide (Jittapalapong et al., 2011; Asif Raza et al., 2013; Yahaya and Tyav, 2014) including India (Gupta et al., 2012; Laha et al., 2013). Studies from Punjab state (Haque et al., 2011; Jyoti et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012) reported only coproscopic prevalence data and information regarding intensity of infection and identification of strongyle parasites is lacking. Hence, the present study was planned to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of various GI parasites in dairy cows and to identify the genera of various strongyle parasites from Punjab state.

Material and Methods                                                                      

Collection of Samples

A total of 1133 faecal samples were collected from apparently healthy adult dairy cows randomly selected from all types of farm practices in 21 districts of different agro-climatic zones of Punjab viz. sub-mountain undulating zone with average annual rainfall of >900 mm (Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur), undulating plain zone: 800-900 mm (Ajitgarh, Rupnagar and Nawanshahr), central plain zone: 500-800 mm (Amritsar, Fatehgarh Sahib, Jalandhar, Kapurthala, Ludhiana, Patiala and Tarn Taran), western plain zone: 400-500 mm (Fazilka, Faridkot and Firozpur) and western zone: <400 mm (Barnala, Bathinda, Mansa, Moga, Muktsar and Sangrur). The samples were placed in sterile polythene bags, labeled, kept in cool transport box and brought to the laboratory for further examination.

Coproscopic Examination

The faecal samples were subjected to standard qualitative examination using direct smear method and concentration techniques (floatation and sedimentation) for detection of the helminthic eggs. The eggs were identified on the basis of typical morphological features (Soulsby, 1982). Samples positive for helminthic eggs were subjected to quantitative faecal sample examination employing standard McMaster’s and Stoll’s dilution technique for nematode and trematode eggs, respectively to calculate the eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces in order to assess the severity of infection (Soulsby, 1982). A representative number of faecal samples positive for strongyle eggs were pooled in equal quantities and used in coproculture at 27ºC as per standard protocol. The hatched out larvae were harvested and used for identification (Van wyk and Mayhew, 2013).

Statistical Analysis

All data analyses were performed by SPSS software version 19.0. Association between prevalence of GI helminth infections and various risk factors was carried out by chi-square test. Variables with significant association at P<0.05 (two-sided) were subjected to the multivariate logistic regression model. The results were each expressed as P value and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI 95%).

Results and Discussion

Coproscopic Examination                            

Of the 1133 samples examined, 467 samples were found positive for GI helminths with an overall prevalence of 41.22% (details in Table 1).

Table 1: Season and zone wise prevalence of GI helminths in cattle of Punjab

Risk Factors Number of Samples (% Prevalence)
Examined Positive Mixed Strongyle Strongyloides Trichuris Moniezia Capillaria Amphi-stome Fasciola
Season Summer 342 140 (40.93) 54 (15.79) 108 (31.58) 4 (1.17) 6 (1.17) 19 (5.56) 1 (0.29) 54 (15.79) 19 (5.56)
Rainy 336 147 (43.75) 62 (18.45) 113 (33.63) 3 (0.89) 5 (1.49) 17 (5.06) 2 (0.6) 48 (14.29) 11 (3.27)
Winter 455 180 (39.56) 52 (11.43) 137 (30.11) 11 (2.42) 10 (2.2) 14 (3.08) 2 (0.44) 50 (10.99) 13 (2.86)
c2 value   1.416 7.909* 1.109 3.424 0.562 3.317 0.354 4.185 4.249
Agro-climatic Zones Sub-Mountain 184 88 (47.82) 32 (17.39) 68 (36.95) 6 (3.26) 3 (1.63) 8 (4.35) 3 (1.63) 34 (18.48) 5 (2.72)
Undulating Plain 141 62 (43.97) 27 (19.15) 41 (29.08) 2 (1.42) 2 (1.42) 5 (3.55) 2 (1.42) 13 (9.22) 3 (2.13)
Central Plain 483 206 (42.65) 75 (15.53) 153 (31.68) 4 (0.83) 11 (2.28) 22 (4.55) 0 (0) 75 (15.53) 30 (6.21)
Western Plain 127 47 (37.01) 15 (11.81) 42 (33.07) 3 (2.36) 3 (2.36) 6 (4.72) 0 (0) 11 (8.66) 2 (1.57)
Western 198 64 (32.32) 19 (9.6) 54 (27.27) 3 (1.51) 2 (1.01) 9 (4.54) 0 (0) 19 (9.6) 3 (1.51)
Total 1133 467 (41.22) 168 (14.83) 358 (31.6) 18 (1.59) 21 (1.85) 50 (4.41) 5 (0.44) 152 (13.42) 43 (3.8)
c2 value   11.561* 8.436 4.701 5.597 1.629 0.314 12.568* 13.010* 13.915**

* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01

Along with mixed infections (14.83 %), various GI helminths in decreasing order of prevalence were strongyles (31.60%), amphistomes (13.42%), Moniezia spp. (4.41%), Fasciola spp. (3.80%), Trichuris spp. (1.85%), Strongyloides spp. (1.59%) and Capillaria spp. (0.44%). Quantitative examination of faecal samples revealed mean EPG of 178.85±10.99, 202.33±11.93 and 160.47±12.94 for strongyles, amphistomes and Fasciola spp., respectively. A wide range of variation in prevalence rates of GI helminths (18.22% to 88.5%) has been reported by various workers (Edosomwan and Shoyemi, 2012; Asif Raza et al., 2013; Pfukenyi et al., 2007; Rahman and Samad, 2010) including India (Hafiz et al., 2011; Gupta et al., 2012). Previous reports from the same region, reported 37.97% (Haque et al., 2011) and 45.52% (Jyoti et al., 2013) prevalence rate of GI helminths which are in close agreement to findings of present study. Furthermore, Hafiz et al. (2011) reported 42.67% positivity for GI helminths in cattle from Kashmir which is similar to our findings. The results are also congruent with those reported from Zimbabwe (Pfukenyi et al., 2007), Thailand (Jittapalapong et al., 2011) and Nigeria (Edosomwan and Shoyemi, 2012). However, several workers have reported higher prevalence rates of GI helminths in cattle (Samanta and Santra, 2009; Rahman and Samad, 2010; Gupta et al., 2012; Asif Raza et al., 2013). The lower prevalence in present study may be possibly due to different geographical area, sample size as well as adoption of improved animal husbandry practices, animal welfare and rational use of anthelmintics in this part of the country (Singh et al., 2012).

Strongyle infection was reported to be the most predominant infection in cattle which is similar to the previous reports from the region (Haque et al., 2011; Jyoti et al., 2013), India (Pandit et al., 2004; Samanta and Santra, 2009; Gupta et al., 2012) as well as abroad (Waruiru et al., 2000; Squire et al., 2013). The higher prevalence rate of strongyles may be due to presence of suitable environmental conditions (hot and humid climate), essential for development of pre-parasitic stages of strongyles (Singh et al., 2012). Furthermore, amphistome prevalence was reported to be higher than Fasciola spp. which may be due to the lack of an effective treatment up to now against cattle paramphistomosis (Mage et al., 2002).

Regarding severity of GI helminthic parasitism, strongyle worm burden was low when compared to other parts of India (Wadhwa et al., 2011; Laha et al 2013) as well as abroad (Pfukenyi et al., 2007; Rahman and Samad, 2010; Hailu et al., 2011) which may be attributed to the better managemental and husbandry practices prevalent (Singh et al., 2012). The EPG of amphistomes was higher to the EPG of Fasciola which may be attributed to the fact that proportion of animals shedding amphistome egg remains higher than those shedding Fasciola eggs in all zones, management systems, farms as well as age groups (Keyyu et al., 2005).

Coprolculture analysis revealed the presence of nematodes of genera Oesophagostomum (28%), Haemonchus (22%), Trichostrongylus (17%), Cooperia (12%), Chabertia (9%), Bunostomum (6%), Strongyloides (4%) and Nematodirus (2%) in decreasing order of the prevalence. Various workers have encountered these nematodes from different parts of India (Murleedharan, 2005) and abroad (Waruiru et al., 2000; Hailu et al., 2011 Asif Raza et al., 2013).

Seasonal Dynamics of GI Helminths

Season was found to play an important role in the prevalence as significant association was observed between the prevalence and season (P = 0.001; OR: 1.059; CI 95%: 0.796-1.409). The highest infection rate was recorded in monsoon (43.75%), followed by summer (40.93%) and least in winter (39.56%) (details in Table 1). The most prevalent parasites were strongyles (31.60%) with maximum prevalence in rainy season followed by amphistomes (13.42%) in summer season. Severity of the strongyle infection based on the EPG count was found to be highest in rainy season (227.27±24.74) and may be associated with humid climatic conditions. Sanyal and Singh (1995) have indicated an increased parasite burden in the host as well as on pasture during the rainy season based on nationwide survey which is in congruent to our findings. The counts for amphistomes (206.67±22.95) and Fasciola spp. (160.00±19.74) were highest in summer and may be due to long pre-patent periods of these infections.

Prevalence of GI Helminths in Different Agro-Climatic Zones

Agro-climatic zones were found to be significantly associated with the prevalence of GI helminthic infection (P < 0.013; OR: 1.919; CI 95%: 1.267-2.907) with western regions revealing lower prevalence than sub-mountain zone. Strongyles were found to be most predominant from all the zones (details in Table 1) and among trematodes, amphistomes were most prevalent (13.42%). Simultaneously, western plain zone (4.72%) and central plain zone (4.55%) reported comparatively higher prevalence of Moniezia spp. infection. The EPG counts of strongyle (215.00±32.68) and amphistome (250.00±34.56) infection were found to be highest in western plain zone whereas, for Fasciola spp. highest count (275.00±62.62) was reported from the undulating plain zone. High prevalence of helminths particularly strongyles, amphistomes and Fasciola were recorded from the zones receiving high annual rainfall as compared to the drier zones. These findings may be attributed to the fact that zones receiving high annual rainfall provide optimum conditions of humidity and temperature required for development of infective stages. Similarly, highest EPG of strongyle, amphistome and Fasciola infection was recorded in sub-mountain zone with higher rainfall and relative humidity thus providing favourable environment required for development and dissemination of exogenous stage of worms along with suitable molarity of salt in soil, which is also an important factor for ecdysis (Hafiz et al., 2011).


Prevalence of GI Helminths in Districts of Punjab

A highly significant (P = 0.000; OR: 1.352; CI 95%: 0.636-2.874) association of the districts and prevalence of GI helminths was recorded in the present investigation with district Ludhiana revealing the highest infection rate (52.7%) and district Bathinda the minimum (10.7%) (details in Fig. 1). The maximum prevalence of strongyles, amphistomes, Fasciola spp. and Moniezia spp. was recorded from district Ludhiana (41.69%), Hoshiarpur (19.87%), Patiala (8.86%) and Muktsar (12.5%), respectively.























Fig. 1: Percent prevalence of GI helminths in dairy cows from Punjab districts


Results of the current study reveal strongyles followed by amphistomes are the predominant GI helminths infecting dairy cows of the Punjab state and are significantly associated with geographical location and seasons. Maximum prevalence was recorded in sub-mountain zone and monsoon season.Therefore data generated in the present study could be of immense help in formulation of effective strategies for GI parasite control in different agro-climatic zones of Punjab.


The authors are thankful to the Dean Postgraduate Studies, GADVASU, Ludhiana for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the research work.


  1. Asif Raza M, Ayaz MM, Murtaza S and Akhtar MS. 2013. Prevalence of GIT Helminths in cattle at the vicinities of tehsil Jatoi, Punjab, Pakistan. Science International. 25: 305-309.
  2. Edosomwan EU and Shoyemi OO. 2012. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of cattle and goats slaughtered at abattoirs in Benin City, Nigeria. African Scientist. 13: 109-114.
  3. Gupta A, Dixit AK, Dixit P and Mahajan C. 2012. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in cattle and buffaloes in and around Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Veterinary 26: 186-188.
  4. Hafiz A, Tufani NA and Makhdoomi DM. 2011. Seasonal prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthiasis in cattle from Kashmir valley. Indian Journal of field Veterinarians. 6: 50-53.
  5. Hailu D, Abera C, Yohannes M and Tolosa T. 2011. Gastrointestinal helminth infections in small-scale dairy cattle farms of Jimma town, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science & Technology. 2: 31-37.
  6. Haque M, Jyoti, Singh NK, Juyal PD, Singh H, Singh R and Rath SS. 2011. Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in dairy animals of western plains of Punjab. Journal of Veterinary 25: 168-170.
  7. Jittapalapong S, Sangwaranond A, Nimsuphan B, Inpankaew T, Phasuk C, Pinyopanuwat N, Chimnoi W, Kengradomkij C, Arunwipat P and Anakewith T. 2011. Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites of dairy cows in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science). 45: 40–45.
  8. Jyoti, Singh NK, Juyal PD, Haque M and Rath SS. 2011. Epidemiology and transmission factors of gastrointestinal parasites in cow calves in different agro-climatic zones of Punjab. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology. 25: 46–49.
  9. Jyoti, Haque M, Singh NK, Singh H, Juyal PD and Rath SS. 2013. Epidemiology of gastro-intestinal parasites in naturally infected dairy animals of central plain zone, Punjab. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research. 22: 55-59.
  10. Keyyu JD, Monard J, Kyvsgarrd NC and Kussuku AA. 2005. Epidemiology of Fasciola gigantica and amphistomes in cattle in traditional, small scale and large- scale dairy farms in the southern highlands of Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health & Production. 37: 303-314.
  11. Laha R, Das M and Goswami A. 2013. Gastrointestinal parasitic infections in organized cattle farms of Meghalaya. Veterinary World, 6: 109-112.
  12. Mage C, Bourgne H, Toullieu JM, Rondelaud D and Dreyfuss G. 2002. Fasciola hepatica and Paramphistomum daubneyi: Changes in prevalences of natural infections in cattle and in Lymnaea truncatula from Central France over the past 12 years. Veterinary Research. 33: 439–447.
  13. Muraleedharan, K., 2005. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of livestock in a central dry zone of Karnataka. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology. 19: 31-33.
  14. Pandit BF, Shahardar RA, Banday MAA and Mattoo FA. 2004. Gastrointesinal helminth parasite of cattle in Kashmir Valley. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology. 18: 63-65.
  15. Pfukenyi DM, Mukaratirwa S, Willingham AL and Monrad J. 2007. Epidemiological studies of parasitic gastrointestinal nematodes, cestodes and coccidian infections in cattle in the highveld and lowveld communal grazing areas of Zimbabwe. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary 74: 129-142.
  16. Rahman MM and Samad MA. 2010. Prevalence of subclinical gastro-intestinal parasitosis and their effects on milk production with therapeutic management in Red Chittagong cattle. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 8: 11-16.
  17. Samanta A and Santra PK. 2009. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthes in hot and humid zone of West Bengal. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology. 23: 73-76.
  18. Sanyal PK and Singh DK. 1995. Parasitic gastroenteritis, In: Proceedings of the workshop on control strategy against gastrointestinal parasites in dairy animals in India using medicated urea molasses locks, National Dairy Development Board, Anand, India.
  19. Singh NK, Singh H, Jyoti, Haque M and Rath SS. 2012. Prevalence of parasitic infections in cattle of Ludhiana district, Punjab. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 36: 256-259.
  20. Soulsby EJL. 1982. Helminths, Arthropods and Protozoa of Domesticated Animals. London. 7th ELBS and Bailliere Tindal. pp: 766.
  21. Squire SA, Amafu-Dey H and Beyuo J. 2013. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of cattle from selected locations in Southern Ghana. Livestock Research Rural Development 25(7): 29-34.
  22. Van Wyk JA and Mayhew E. 2013. Morphological identification of parasitic nematode infective larvae of small ruminants and cattle: A practical lab guide. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary 80: 1-14.
  23. Wadhwa A, Tanwar RK, Singla LD, Eda S, Kumar N and Kumar Y. 2011. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthes in cattle and buffalo in Bikaner, Rajasthan. India. Veterinary World. 4: 417-419.
  24. Waruiru RM, Kyvsgaard NC, Thamsborg SM, Nansen P, Bogh HO, Munyua WK and Gathuma JM. 2000. The prevalence and intensity of helminth and coccidial infections in dairy cattle in central Kenya. Veterinary Research 24: 39-53.
  25. Yahaya A and Tyav YB. 2014. A survey of gastrointestinal parasitic helminths of bovine slaughtered in abattoir, Wudil local government area, Kano state, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Biological Sciences. 4: 128-134.
Abstract Read : 90 Downloads : 14
Previous Next