NAAS Score 2020

                   5.36

UserOnline

Free counters!

Previous Next

Seasonal Dynamics in the Prevalence of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus on Cattle of Coastal Odisha

M. Dehuri M. R. Panda B. N. Mohanty A. Hembram P. Arukha
Vol 8(6), 133-138
DOI- http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20171115121311

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus ) microplus is an economically important one host tick species infesting cattle worldwide. The study was conducted for a period of one year (February 2016 to January 2017) in four districts of coastal Odisha during which 2918 cattle were examined and the prevalence of tick was found to be 24.64%.There was a higher abundance of ticks during monsoon, followed by pre-monsoon/summer, post monsoon and winter. Correlation analysis with climatic factors showed positive correlation with significance (p<0.01) for rainfall and relative humidity.


Keywords : Rhipicephalus (Boophilus)microplus Monsoon Prevalence

Introduction

Around 80% of the world cattle population is infested with ticks, while reports from Food and Agricultural Organization have estimated the global losses due to hard tick infestation to be US $ 7.0 billion annually (Harrow et al., 1991). Rhipicephalus (Boophilus ) microplus is one of the most dominant ixodid ticks found in different parts of India (Khan,1994: Singh,2007)  as well as world (Estrada Pena et al., 2006 ;  Canevari et al., 2017 ) . It is a one host cattle tick that transmits important parasitic diseases like babesiosis and anaplasmosis. The economic losses in cattle production caused by the parasitism of R. (B.) microplus are associated with decreases in weight gain and milk production, hide damage as well as the ensuing control costs. The life cycle  of this tick involves  both parasitic (feeding of developmental stages, moulting and dropping off for oviposition) and non parasitic (oviposition, incubation and host seeking) phases , in which the duration of parasitic phase is constant but duration of non parasitic phase varies depending on various environmental factors (Nunez et al., 1982). The state of Odisha has tropical climate, characterized by high temperature, high humidity, medium to high rainfall and short and mild winters. Studies concerning   the host related factors governing tick distribution have been documented, but those regarding effect of environmental factors like climate are scanty in our region. It is essential to know the seasonal dynamics of the ticks for better control strategies like acaricide application. Therefore the study has been designed to know the seasonal variation and effect of climatic factors on the prevalence of the ticks in coastal Odisha.

Materials and Methods

In this study, a total of 2918 cattle of both sex and varying age groups (< 1 year and >1 year) randomly selected from different villages of four districts (Puri, Jagatsinghpur, Kendrapada and Khurda) of coastal Odisha (Map-1). The cattle population were investigated for tick infestation for a period of one year (February 2016 to January 2017), the year being divided into four season; winter (January, February) summer/ Pre-monsoon (March to May), Monsoon (June to September) and Post monsoon (October to December). The animals were carefully examined all over starting from skin to various other parts of the body for presence of ticks. The collected ticks were kept in vials containing 70% alcohol with 5% glycerol for preservation and labelled with information about the host (age, sex, and breed) and locality. Ticks were identified under a stereomicroscope using the standard identification keys (Walker et al., 2003). Meterologial data like temperature, rainfall and relative humidity were obtained from the Department of Agrometerology in the University campus. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 13.0 and correlation studies with statistical differences (p<0.01 and p<0.05) were calculated.

Results and Discussion

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation was observed in 719 out of a total of 2918 cattle examined (24.64%) . Pure infestation with Boophilus was observed in 458 cattle while mixed with other ixodid ticks were recorded in 261 cattle. Our reports on prevalence percentage are in conformity with reports from Andhra Pradesh (Rajendran and Hafeez, 2003) and Turkey (Ica et al., 2007).   However a higher rate of abundance (> 40%) has been documented by Vatsya et al., 2007; Patel et al., 2013 and Kaur et al., 2015 from different parts of the country. The differences in the rate of prevalence could be due to various geographical or other biotic factors in the study area. There was continued presence of the tick throughout the year though with varying abundances, which has been previously described by Tandon, 1990; Khan, 1994 and Singh et al., 2007. A higher prevalence of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus during monsoon (June to September) with a peak during July followed by summer/pre-monsoon, post monsoon and winter as depicted in Fig.1 corroborates with findings elsewhere by Singh et al., 2007;Haque et al., 2011;Singh and Rath,2013 and Kaur et al., 2015 indicating a important role of humidity as a microclimatic factor in seasonal variation.

Fig.1: Month wise prevalence percentage of tick

During the monsoon, the various climatic factors are optimally more favourable for propagation of life cycle of ticks. A lower presence during winter, when there is low temperature may be attributed to delayed morphogenesis and reduced tick activity with the tick moving to underlying shelters. An optimum temperature of 31-38°C is desirable for attachment of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus ) microplus larva on host (Doub and Kemp, 1979). The correlation study of tick count with different climatic parameters like temperature, relative humidity and rainfall showed a high correlation (Fig.2&3) with statistical significance (P< 0.01) for rainfall (r=0.896) and relative humidity (r=0.731) but low correlation  without statistical significance (Fig. 4) was observed for average temperature (r=0.506).Our findings are in consonance with observation by Bekele ,2002 who documented positive correlation with rainfall and relative humidity in Ethiopia.

Fig.2: Scatter plot of correlation between rainfall and tick count

Fig.3: Scatter plot of correlation between relative humidity and tick count

Fig. 4: Scatter plot of correlation between average temperature and tick count

Positive correlation with rainfall has been described by Rawlins,1979 ; Lima et al., 2000; Alvarez et al.,2003 ; Vatsya et al.,2007  and Jyotika et al., 2008 .There is maximum egg production in case of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus ) microplus at 25-30°C while the egg production ceases below  10 °C . There is also shrinkage and failure of hatching when humidity lies between 20-40% (Khan, 1994). Da costa et al.,2014  in a study revealed  temperature to be the only climatic factor that correlated significantly  with the tick population levels while Punyua et al.,1991 observed no significant correlation of population changes with the climatic factors but with managemental factors in . These differences could be ascribed to the differences in climatic effects in different study areas.

Conclusion

Our study depicts the presence of Rhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplus throughout the year but with varying intensity and being influenced by microclimatic conditions like rainfall and relative humidity. It is recommended to use acaricides on the onset of monsoon to control tick and tick borne diseases.

References

  1. Alvarez V, Bonilla R and Chacon I. 2003. Relative frequency of Boophilus microplus(Acari: Ixodidae) inbovines (Bos Taurus and B. indicus) in eight ecological zones of Costa Rica. Rev Biology Tropica. 51:427–434.
  2. Bekele T. 2002. Studies on seasonal dynamics of ticks of ogaden cattle and individual variation in resistance to ticks in eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 49(6): 285-8.
  3. Canevari J T, Mangold, A J, Guglielmoe A A and  Nava S. 2017. Population dynamics of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplus in a subtropical subhumid region of Argentina for use in the design of control strategies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology.  31: 6–14.
  4. Da Costa MSF, Guimaraes MP, Lima WS, Costa AJF, Facury Filho EJ and Araujo RN. 2014. Seasonal variation and frequency distribution of ectoparasites in crossbreed cattle in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 1: 10-18.
  5. Doub BM and Kemp DH.1979. The influence of temperature, relative humidity and host factors on the attachment and survival of Boophilus Microplus(Canestrini) larvae to skin slices. International Journal of Parasitology. 9(5):449-54.
  6. Estrada-Pena M, Corson J M ,Venzal A J, Mangold N and Guglielmone 2006.Changes in climate and habitat suitability for the cattle tick Boophilus microplus in its southern Neotropical distribution range . Journal of Vector Ecology 31(1):158-167.
  7. Haque M, Singh NK, Rath SS and Ghosh S.2011. Epidemiology and seasonal dynamics of Ixodid ticks of dairy animals of Punjab state, India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 81(7): 661-664.
  8. Harrow ID, Grationand KAF and Evans N. 1991.Neurobiology of arthropod parasites.Parasitology.102:559–569.
  9. Ica A, Vatansever Z, Yildirim A, Duzlu O and Inci A. 2007. Detection of Theileria and Babesia species in ticks collected from cattle.Veterinary Parasitology. 148(2):156-60.
  10. Jyotika KG, Singh M and Singh A. 2008. Population dynamics of ixodid ticks infestating cattle in Bathinda and Hoghiarpur districts in the Punjab state. Bio. 24(1): 95-100.
  11. Kaur D, Jaiswal K, and Mishra S.2015. Studies on Prevalence of Ixodid Ticks Infesting Cattle and Their Control by Plant Extracts. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences .10 (6): 01-11.
  12. Lima WS, Ribeiro MF and Guimaraes MP. 2000. Seasonal Variation of Boophilus Microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae) in Cattle in Minas Gerais State, Brazil .Tropical Animal Health Production. 32 (6): 375-380.
  13. Khan MH .1994. Infestation of ticks on cattle and buffaloes in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh Journal of Veterinary Parasitology. 8:71-76.
  14. Nunez JL, Munoz Cobenas M and Moltedo H. 1982. Boophilus microplus: The Common Cattle Tick. Springer-Verlag Editors. Berlin, Germany.pp. 204.
  15. Patel G, Shanker D, Jaiswal AK,  Sudan V and  Verma 2013. Prevalence and seasonal variation in ixodid ticks on cattle of Mathura district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Parasitic Disease. 37(2): 173–176.

16.                                       Punyua D. K.,  Latif A. A., Nokoe, S.   Capstick P. B.(1991) Tick (Acari: Ixodidae) Infestations on Zebu Cattle in Western Kenya: Seasonal Dynamics of Four Species of Ticks on Traditionally Managed Cattle .Journal of Medical Entomology. 28(5): 630–636.

  1. Rajendran, C and Hafeez, MD. 2003. Prevalence of ixodid ticks on crossbred cattle in and around Tirupati. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology .17: 147-149.
  2. Rawlins S C.   Seasonal variation in the population density of larvae of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acari: Ixodoidea) in Jamaican pastures. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 69(1): 87-91.
  3. Singh OG, Mohilal N and Gambhir RK (2007).Incidence of cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1888) in Manipur valley, India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology. 27 (2):263-265.
  4. Singh NK and Rath SS. 2013. Epidemiology of ixodid ticks in cattle population of various agro-climatic zones of Punjab, India. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine.6(12): 947–951.
  5. Tandon,S.K. 1990.Distribution,Seasonal Activity and Disease Relationship of Ixodid tick parasitizing Livestock in Zambia.Record of Zoological Survey of India.86(2):361-381.
  6. Vatsya, S, Yadav CL, Kumar RR and Garg R. 2007. Seasonal activity of Boophilus microplus at an organised farm. Journal of Parasitology.21 (2): 125-128.
  7. Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada- Pena A, Horak IG, Latif A, Pegram RG, Preston PM .2003. Ticks of domestic animals in Africa, A guide to identification of species. Bioscience Reports, U.K.
Full Text Read : 1425 Downloads : 266
Previous Next

Open Access Policy

Close