NAAS Score 2018


Declaration Format

Please download DeclarationForm and submit along with manuscript.


Free counters!

Previous Next

Supplementation of Ground Maize Grain and Mineral Mixture to Improve Milk Solid-Not-Fat Content in Dairy Cattle

Manjunatha Lakshminarasimhaiah Suresh N Bypanahalli Naveenkumar G Srinivasmurthy Bharathraj Basavaiah Dharanesha N Krishnegowda
Vol 8(10), 307-312

A participatory research was conducted under Sujala III watershed project with an aim to improve milk solid constituents of the dairy cattle showing low solid-not-fat (SNF) syndrome by supplementation of ground maize and mineral mixture in their conventional diets. For the purpose, sixteen crossbred cows in mid to late lactation producing milk containing SNF less than acceptable standard (8.5 %) set by the co-operative milk union were selected in two villages of Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka State. Data on feeding practices of the selected animals were collected and its analysis has revealed that the cows were deficient in most of the nutrients required for milk production, particularly energy and minerals. Based on this information, the farmers were suggested to supplement ground maize grains @ 200 g and mineral mixture @ 10 g/kg milk yield to the existing cow diet (dry sorghum ad lib + cattle feed @ 1-1.5 kg/animal). The study was conducted during summer for a period of 21 days. The data on milk yield and its constituents (fat and SNF) were recorded seven days prior to suggested intervention and fourteen days afterwards. The results revealed that the average milk yield significantly (P<0.05) increased after intervention. The milk SNF content also significantly (P<0.01) improved after supplementing maize grain powder when compared to previous feeding practice. The milk fat remained statistically similar during before and after the intervention except in one village. It was concluded that feeding of energy rich concentrate feed ingredients along with mineral mixture improves the SNF content of milk of crossbred cattle.

Keywords : Dairy Cattle Ground Maize Grain Mineral Mixture Milk Fat Milk Solid-Not-Fat

Solid components (fat, protein, lactose, minerals) in the milk are economically important to milk producers and processors and nutritionally important to consumers. Both quality and quantity of milk produced are determined mainly by genetics and feeding practices. Though other factors such as breed, stage of lactation, level of milk production, age of cow, environment and disease condition affect milk composition, low milk fat and SNF problem in dairy cow is largely of nutritional origin (Rook and Line, 1961; Annison and McDowell, 1977). Feeding practices of dairy animals will have major impact on levels of fat and SNF concentration in milk. Fat and SNF components of milk will vary with changes in the diet. However, the variation in SNF component is to a lesser degree compared to that of fat content of milk. This problem is more common during summer season due to scarcity and poor quality of feedstuffs. The low milk fat condition is due to inadequate fiber in the diet. However, low SNF problem is almost invariably associated with underfeeding. Several on-farm trials indicated that the possible reason for low SNF in milk in field animals could be on account of deficiency of various critical nutrients (Garg, 2012; Garg et al., 2016). Thus nutritional factor plays a major role and is the key tool available in the hands of the dairy farmer whereby he can modify the milk composition accordingly. In this context, the present study was undertaken to identify the cause for low fat and SNF problem in milk of certain cows of the farmers in the watershed area and to undertake appropriate intervention to overcome the above situation.

Materials and Methods

During the base line study conducted in the sub-watershed area in Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka State, India under Sujala III watershed project, many farmers expressed the problem of low fat and SNF in the milk of their cows. Hence, a technical committee was formed to investigate the nutrient status of field animals having low SNF in milk and whether or not the correction of major nutrient deficiencies help in ameliorating the situation. For the purpose, two villages viz. Kethahalli and Maleyur under Harave sub-watershed area were selected and the experiment was conducted during the months of April-May 2016 and during July-August 2016, respectively. The list of farmers facing low fat and SNF problem was prepared with the help of Milk Producers’ Co-operative Societies. All the milking animals belonging to the enlisted farmers were screened and 16 animals with low SNF in each village were identified for the study. The body weight of the animals were calculated using Shaeffer’s formula-

Body weight (kg) = [(heart girth in inches)2 x length of the body in inches] /660.

Prevailing feeding practices for these animals were measured right at the milk producers’ doorstep for three consecutive days. The details of the animals under study are presented in Table 1. Thereafter, based on body weight and milk production amount of nutrients required by the animals, particularly for digestible crude protein (DCP), total digestible nutrients (TDN), calcium and phosphorus were calculated. By taking into account all the components of the ration, the supply and balance of selected nutrients of the animals were tabulated.

Table 1: Details of animals under the study

Particulars Kethahalli Maleyur
Avg. cow body weight (Kgs) 345 330
Avg. milk yield per day (Kgs) 6.34 5.44
Avg. dry fodder intake (Kgs) 6.21 5.50
Avg. green fodder intake (Kgs) 11.88
Avg. concentrate mixture offered (Kgs) 2.14 2.13

Based upon the nutrient balance, feeding strategy to be followed to maximize the solid components of milk was recommended to the farmers. Since the energy and minerals are the important nutrients for milk production, the farmers were suggested to supplement the animal ration with ground maize grain @ 200 g per liter of milk produced along with mineral mixture @10 g per litre of milk. The milk yield and its composition viz. fat and SNF were recorded from one week prior to the intervention and up to two weeks post intervention.

Result and Discussion

The data on lactating animals and the feeding practices followed by the farmers were analyzed to ascertain the nutritional cause for the low fat and SNF problem and the details are given in Table 2. The nutrient balance study revealed that all the animals were receiving lesser amount of nutrients particular energy and minerals than the amount required to sustain milk production.

Table 2: Nutrient balance of the cows in experiment

Nutrient, g Kethahalli Maleyur
Required Provided Deficit Required Provided Deficit
Total Digestible Nutrients 4814 3060 1754 4428 3914 634
Digestible Crude Protein 582 270 312 525 375 150
Calcium 43 9.7 33.3 40 11.5 28.5
Phosphorous 30 3.9 26.1 28 4.8 23.2

The lower fat and SNF contents is common during the summer months of the year. This indicates that the fat and SNF are more vulnerable to the environmental temperature which indirectly reflect the plane of nutrition. Dry roughages such as sorghum stover, ragi straw and horse gram straw form the major portion of rations of dairy cows in Chamarajanagar region. These feedstuffs contain high amount of fiber and low in soluble carbohydrates. Such rations with minimal grains possess insufficient non-structural carbohydrates, increases fat percentage and reduce yield and protein percentage. Thus, feeding proper non-structural carbohydrates levels can improve milk fat and protein test. Hence, feeding limited quantity of cereals such as maize, sorghum, etc. will improve SNF content of milk. In the experiment maize grain mash was used to supplement the routine feeding practice.

The two most important major minerals affecting milk composition are calcium (Ca) and phosphorous (P). 2.8 g Ca and 2.0 g P should be provided per kg of milk produced. The trace minerals routinely included in mineral mixture of dairy cattle are Se, Mn, Zn, Fe, I, Co, Cu. Further, P, S and Co are also required by ruminal microbiota for fermentation of the plant cell walls and release of cell contents (Storm and Orskov, 1983); Sniffen and Robinson, 1987). Thus, they play an essential role in digestion and thus influence appetite and feed intake. In this context standard mineral mixture available in the market and containing the above minerals was provided. Thus, the recommended feeding practice included: maize grain mash @ 200g and mineral mixture @ 10 g per litre of milk produced. This was fed to animals daily in two divided doses in the morning and evening over and above the routine feeding done by the farmers.

The milk production and composition of cows before and after intervention is presented in Table 3. On feeding maize grain mash and mineral mixture, average daily milk yield and milk fat increased from 6.34 to 6.45 kg; 3.85 to 3.86 % in Kethahalli village and from 5.29 to 5.48 kg; 3.67 to 3.82 % in Maleyur village, respectively. The SNF content of milk increased from 7.96 to 8.06% in Kethahalli village and from 7.94 to 8.05 % in Maleyur village. The increase in SNF content of milk of crossbred cattle was significant (P<0.01) in both Kethahalli and Maleyur villages while the significant increase in milk fat percentage was observed only in Maleyur village.

Table 3: Milk production and composition of cows before and after intervention

Particulars Kethahalli Village Maleyur Village
Milk Yield Kg Milk Milk Milk Yield Kg Milk Milk
Fat % SNF % Fat % SNF %
Before Intervention 6.34±0.49 3.85±0.01 7.96±0.01 5.29±0.37 3.67±0.06 7.94±0.01
After Intervention 6.45±0.49 3.86±0.02 8.06±0.01 5.48±0.37 3.82±0.02 8.05±0.01
P-Value 0.016 0.726 <0.001 <0.001 0.016 <0.001
Increase, units 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.19 0.15 0.11

The low SNF content in milk before intervention may be due to high fiber in the ration which limit milk protein production because not enough energy is consumed. The improvement in milk yield and SNF after intervention may be due to balancing of nutrients which might have improved microbial protein synthesis and also due to supply of essential minerals. Energy and protein are the most important limiting factors for milk production and its supplementation in the diets of lactating ruminants increased milk yield. Findings are similar to Haldar and Rai (2003) who reported improvement in milk yield due to supplementation of energy and mineral mixture in lactating ruminants. Kumaresan et al. (2008) also reported that energy enrichment with environmental management will increase the fat and SNF yield and performance of the animals in summer.

Another important aspect in the physiology of lactation is the severe drainage of minerals through milk. Supplementation of minerals in the diet of lactating ruminants has been reported to enhance milk production along with an improvement in milk composition (Kannan et al., 2010). The results are in agreement with that of Dutta et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2010 and Khochare et al., 2010. In general, maintaining optimum levels of protein, energy and minerals is essential for rumen functions and synthesis of milk components in mammary gland.


It was observed that the dairy animals exhibiting low fat and SNF problem were deficit of all the major nutrients mainly energy, protein and minerals. The recommended intervention viz. supplementing maize grain mash @ 200g/kg milk and mineral mixture @ 10g/kg milk/day to the existing feeding practice had significantly increased milk production and SNF. However, no significant change in milk fat percentage was observed. Thus, it was concluded that supplementing animal’s diet with energy rich feed source (maize, sorghum) and mineral mixture can increase the yield and SNF components of milk of crossbred cattle under the watershed areas of Chamarajanagar district.


The authors acknowledge the support extended by Veterinary College, Hassan, KVAFSU, Bidar and Sujala-III project administration; Milk Producers’ Co-operative Societies and participatory farmers of Maleyur and Kethahalli villages of Chamarajanagar taluk & district, Karnataka for the successful conduct of the study.


  1. Annison, E.F. and Mc Dowell, G.H. (1977). Strategies to prevent the low fat and low solids-not fat syndromes in dairy cow. Proceedings of ‘Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition’ held at Sydney, Australia. pp. 130-138.
  2. Dutta, N., Sharma, K., Pattanaik, A.K., Singh, A. and Narang, A. (2010). Effect of strategic supplementation of limiting macro nutrients on the lactation performance of buffaloes. In: Proceedings of VII Animal Nutrition Association Conference, Bhubaneswar, India. pp. 27.
  3. Garg, M.R. (2012). Balanced feeding for improving livestock productivity. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 173. Rome, Italy, ISBN 978- 92-5-107303-2.
  4. Garg, M.R., Bhanderi, B.M. and Ajay, G. (2016). Impact of balanced feeding on the solids-not-fat (SNF) content of milk. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69 (3):343-349.
  5. Haldar, S. and Rai, S.N. (2003). Effects of energy and mineral supplementation on nutrient digestibility and efficiency of milk production in lactating goats. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 20, 244-251.
  6. Kannan, A., Garg, M.R. and Singh, P. (2010). Effect of ration balancing on methane emission and milk production in lactating animals under field conditions in Rae Bareli district of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 27, 103-108.
  7. Khochare, A.B., Kank, V.D., Gadegaonkar, G.M. and Salunke, S.C. (2010). Strategic supplementation of limiting nutrients to medium yielding dairy animals at field level. In: Proceedings of VII Animal Nutrition Association Conference, Bhubaneswar, India. pp. 30.
  8. Kumaresan, G., Saravanakumar, K., Murugan, B., Rajendran, D., Devendran, P. and Annal Villi R. (2008). Finely ground dry corn supplementation to improve solids not fat content of crossbred cattle milk during summer under tropical climate. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 4(2): 202-206.
  9. Rook, J.A.F. and Line, C. (1961). The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow on the secretion in milk of the constituents of the solids-not-fat fraction and on the concentrations of certain blood plasma constituents. British Journal of Nutrition, 15, 109-114.
  10. Sniffen, C.J. and Robinson, P.H. (1987). Microbial growth and flows as influenced by dietary manipulations. Journal of Dairy Science, 70, 425–441.
  11. Storm, E. and Orskov, E.R. (1983). The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants – Large-scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen micro-organisms. British Journal of Nutrition, 50, 463-470.
Abstract Read : 75 Downloads : 25
Previous Next