A Study to Predict Impact of Atmospheric Temperature and Carbon dioxide Increase on Digestibility (in vitro and in vivo) of Maize Fodder in Ram Lambs
Keywords:
Temperature, Carbon dioxide, Maize fodder, Digestibility (In vitro & In vivo)Abstract
Present study was conducted to assess the impact of increasing temperature and carbon dioxide on maize fodder (stems and leaves) digestibility in ram lambs. The maize fodder was grown with recommended package of practices in the CTGC chambers under four set of environmental conditions (a) Reference (ambient temperature and carbon dioxide i.e., 27±0.5ºC and 380 ± 25 ppm CO2), (b) Chamber with temperature gradient of 5±0.5°C over reference and referred as elevated temperature (eTemp), (c) Chamber with elevated CO2 concentration of 550± 50 ppm with temperature gradient 5±0.5°C over reference referred as elevated carbon dioxide and temperature (eCO2+ eTemp) and (d) Chamber with elevated CO2 concentration of 550± 50ppm referred as elevated carbon dioxide (eCO2). Leaf and stem portion of maize fodder at milking stage were screened , in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) by ankom technology, in vitro gas production technique by ankom gas production system and digestibility of nutrients through a digestibility trial on Nellore Ram lambs. In vitro dry matter degradability (IVDMD) of stem and leaf portion in the maize fodder grown under carbon dioxide and temperature gradient chambers (CTGC) differed significantly (P<0.05). Highest IVDMD (%) in maize stem was found in the maize fodder grown in eCO2 (51.1±0.12), whereas lowest (43.6±0.84) under eTemp environmental chamber conditions. Leaf of maize fodder grown at ambient (reference) (55.3±0.12) had highest IVDMD, whereas lowest (50.1±0.43) under eTemp environmental chamber conditions. Among different chambers, highest (P<0.05) DE (MJ/kg DM) was found in the stem and leaf of the maize fodder grown in eCO2 chamber. DE in maize stem and leaf decreased (P<0.05) from G1 to G5 as temperature increased in both the eTemp and eCO2+e Temp chambers. A similar trend was observed in Metabolizable energy (ME) content of maize stem. Cumulative gas production (ml/g-1DM) from stem and leaf of maize fodder grown in carbon dioxide and temperature gradient chambers (CTGC) differed significantly (P<0.05). A similar trend was observed in leaf portion of maize fodder grown in CTGC. Average dry matter (DM) digestibility coefficients (P < 0.05) of 68.40 ± 0.93, 64.26 ±1.04, 66.92 ±1.14 and 65.58 ± 0.76 per cent were recorded for ambient, e Temp, eCO2 and eCO2+e Temp, respectively, respectively for the maize fodder grown in CTGC under different environmental conditions. Similarly, crude protein (CP) digestibility coefficients were 71.46 ± 0.42, 66.32 ± 0.62, 68.06 ± 0.48 and 69.22 ± 0.56 per cent and crude fibre (CF) digestibility coefficients were 60.43 ± 0.52, 58.12 ± 0.74, 59.26 ± 0.43 and 58.54 ± 0.65 per cent for ambient, e Temp, eCO2 and eCO2+e Temp, respectively for the maize fodder grown in CTGC under different environmental conditions. The study indicated that nutritive value of maize fodder in terms of CP and DE/ME would decrease under elevated temperature and elevated carbon dioxide & temperature environmental conditions. Further, growing maize fodder under elevated temperature and elevated carbon dioxide & temperature would results in lower digestibility in small ruminants.
References
Buxton, D.R., Fales, S.L., Fahey, G.C., Collins, M., Mertens, D.R, Moser, L.E. 1994. Plant environment and quality. Quality Evaluation and Utilization. pp 155-199.
Deinum, B., and Dirven, J.G.P. 1974. Climate, nitrogen and grass. Comparison of yield and chemical composition of some temperate and tropical grass species grown at different temperatures. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 23(1):69–82.
Fonnesbeck, P.V., Clark, D.H., Garret, W.N., and Speth, C.F. 1984. Predicting energy utilization from alfalfa hay from the Western Region. Proceedings-Animal Science( Western Section) 35: 305-308.
Getachew, G., Robinson, P.H., DePeters, E.J, and Taylor, S.J. 2004. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111(1-4): 57-71.
International Grain Council. Grain Marked Report. 2018, pp. 1–8. online: http://www.igc.int/downloads/gmrsummary/gmrsumme.pdf . Accessed Aug .14, 2018.
Keeling, C.D., and Whorf. 1994. Atmospheric CO2 records from the sites in the SIO air sampling network. Trends' 93: A compendium of Data on Global Change. pp 16-26.
Khalil, J., Sawaya, W.N., and Hyder, S.Z. 1986. Nutrient composition of Atriplex leaves grown in Saudi Arabia. Rangeland Ecology & Management. Journal of Range Management Archives 39(2): 104-107.
Moore, B.D., Jung, S.H., Sims, D., and Seemann, J.R. 2001. The bio-chemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant Cell Environment 22: 567-582.
Newton, P.C. D. 1991. Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on pasture plants and communities. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 1-24.
SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). Version 16. Application Guide. SPSS Inc.
Tom-Dery, D., Eller, F., Jensen, K., and Reisdorff, C. 2018. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and climate change on biomass and nutritive value of Kyasuwa (Cenchrus pedicellatus Trin.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 91: 88-95.
Van Soest, P.V., Robertson, J.B., and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74(10): 3583-3597.
Xiangyu He., Yanping Wu., Min Cai., Chunlong Mu., Weihong Luo2., Yanfen Cheng1., and Weiyun Zhu He X Wu, Y., Cai M Mu, C., Luo, W, Cheng, Y., and Zhu, W. 2015. The effect of increased atmospheric temperature and CO2 concentration during crop growth on the chemical composition and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of wheat straw. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 6(1): 1-8.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Katyaaayani Singirala, A. Sarat Chandra, D. B. V. Ramana, R. M. V. Prasad, D. Sreenivas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.