Use of Modern Genetic Approaches in Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources (FAnGR): A Review

Authors

  • Shweta Sachan PhD Scholar, Animal Genetics and Breeding Division, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • Babu Lal Saini PhD Scholar, Animal Genetics and Breeding Division, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA
  • Ashish Bhaladhare PhD Scholar, Animal Genetics and Breeding Division, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20201018071309

Keywords:

Bio-diversity, Conservation, Farm animal, Genetic resource, Germplasm, In vivo, In vitro

Abstract

Farm animals supply 30 percent of total human requirements for food and agriculture and 70 percent of the world’s rural population rely on livestock as a component of their livelihoods. On the basis of policy developments, climate change and diversifying market demands, livestock conservation practice is changing rapidly. Selective breeding and exchange of farm animals or germplasm among users within and across countries are most commonly used strategies of enhancing livestock production but it resulted in the reduction of the bio-diversity of breeds. The selection pressure strongly increased, and therefore the reproduction among breeds was seriously reduced, resulting in the fragmentation of the initial gene pool. The selection pressure further increased due to the use of artificial insemination, leading to a few industrial breeds with very high performances, but with low effective population sizes. Beside this performance improvement of industrial breeds, genetic resources are being lost specifically indigenous and local breeds, because of the replacement of traditional breeds by high performance industrial breeds at the worldwide level. Many breeds are already extinct, and genetic resources in indigenous cattle, sheep, and goats are thus highly endangered, particularly in developed countries. Based on sound genetic characterization, urgent conservation measures must be taken to avoid an irremediable loss of livestock genetic resources, integrating economical, sociological, and political parameters. The livestock genomic sector therefore needs to make a concerted effort in the coming decade to enable to the democratization of the powerful tools to ensure that they are applied within the context of breed conservation as well as development. Recently, development of effective technologies opens new avenues for correctly characterizing the genetic resources, not only within the very diverse domestic breeds, but also in their wild relatives. In conclusion, genetic characterization of indigenous breeds of farm animals by the use of effective techniques and their conservation is only alternate to maintain farm animal bio-diversity.

References

Alasmari, N. M., Son, W. Y. & Dahan, M. H. (2016). The effect on pregnancy and multiples of transferring 1-3 embryos in women at least 40 years old. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(9), 1195-1202.

Belew, A. K., Tesfaye, K. & Belay, G. (2016). The State of Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources in Developing Countries: A Review. International Journal of Pharma Medicine and Biological Sciences, 5(1), 58-66.

Boettcher, P. J., Boichard, M. T., Toro, M. A., Simianer, H., Eding, H., Gandini, G., et al. (2010). Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources. Animal Genetics, 41, 64-77.

Buriak, I., Fleck, R. A., Goltsev, A., Shevchenko, N., Petrushko, M., Yurchuk, T., et al. (2020). Translation of cryobiological techniques to socially economically deprived populations-Part 1: Cryogenic Preservation Strategies. Journal of Medical Devices, 14(1), 010801.

Checura, C. M. & Seidel, G. E. Jr. (2007). Effect of macromolecules in solutions for vitrification of mature bovine oocytes. Theriogenology, 67(5), 919-930.

Cognie, Y., Baril, G., Poulin, N. & Mermillod, P. (2003). Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goat. Theriogenology, 59(1), 171–188.

Drucker, A. G., Hiemstra, S. J., Louwaars, N., Oldenbroek, J. K., Tvedt, M. W., Hoffmann, I., et al. (2007). Back to the future: How scenarios of future globalization, biotechnology, disease and climate change can inform present animal genetic resources policy development. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 2(41), 75-89.

FAO. (1981). Animal genetic resources - Conservation and management. Proceedings of the FAO/UNEP technical consultation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

FAO. (2007). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture [Rischkowsky, B., Pilling, D., (eds.)]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

FAO. (2009). The use and exchange of animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Background study paper no. 43.

FAO. (2012). Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 12. Rome.

FAO. (2013). In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Animal production and health guidelines no. 14.

FAO. (2019). Status and Trends of Animal Genetic Resources–2018; Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Aaccessed on 30 August, 2020).

Furlan, E., Stoklosa, J., Griffiths, J., Gust, N., Ellis, R., Huggins, R. M. & Weeks A. R. (2012). Small population size and extremely low levels of genetic diversity in island populations of the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. Ecology and Evolution, 2(4), 844–857.

He, X., Park, E. Y., Fowler, A., Yarmush, M. L. & Toner, M. (2008). Vitrification by ultra-fast cooling at a low concentration of cryoprotectants in a quartz micro-capillary: a study using murine embryonic stem cells. Cryobiology, 56(3), 223-232.

Jang, T. H., Park, S. C., Yang, J. H, et al. (2017). Cryopreservation and its clinical applications. Integrative Medicine Research, 6(1), 12-18.

Kasso, M. & Balakrishnan, M. (2013). Ex Situ conservation of biodiversity with particular emphasis to Ethiopia. International Scholarly Research Notices, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/985037.

Ledda, S., Leoni, G., Bogliolo, L. & Naitana, S. (2001). Oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue banking. Theriogenology, 55(6), 1359-1371.

Lee, H.J., Elmoazzen, H., Wright, D., et al. (2010). Ultra-rapid vitrification of mouse oocytes in low cryoprotectant concentrations. Reproductive BioMedicine, 20(2), 201-208.

Leroy, G., Boettcher, P., Besbes, B., Danchin-Burge, C., Baumung, R. & Hiemstra, S. J. (2019). Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources in Europe and two African countries: A Gap Analysis. Diversity, 11(12), 240.

National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning. Washington (DC), USA. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223960.

NBAGR. (2020). http://www.nbagr.res.in/registeredbreed.html accessed on 30 August, 2020.

Pereira, R. M. & Marques, C. C. (2008). Animal oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Cell and Tissue Banking, 9(4), 267–277.

Philipsson, J., Rege, J. E. O., Zonabend, E. & Okeyo, A. M. (2011). Sustainable breeding programmes for tropical farming systems, in Animal Genetics Training Resource [Ojango, J. M., Malmfors, B., Okeyo, A. M. (eds.)]. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Prentice, J. R. & Anzar, M. (2010). Cryopreservation of Mammalian oocyte for conservation of animal genetics. Veterinary Medicine International, doi:10.4061/2011/146405.

Rosegrant M. W., et al. (2009). Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST (Agricultural Knowledge Science and Technology). In Agriculture at a crossroads [McIntyre B. D., Herren, H. R., Wakhungu, J., Watson, R. T., (eds.)], Washington, DC, USA. pp. 307–376.

Taberlet, P., Pansu, J. & Pompanon, F. (2011). Conservation genetics of cattle, sheep, and goats. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334: 247-254.

Tian, X. C., Kubota, C., Enright, B. & Yang X. (2003). Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer--biological factors. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, doi:10.1186/1477-7827-1-98.

Tisdell, C. (2003). Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: Analysis and assessment. Ecological Economics, 45, 365-376.

Wilcox, B. A. & Soule, M. E. (1980). Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

Youngs, C. R. (2011). Cryopreservation of preimplantation embryos of cattle, sheep, and goats. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (54), 2764.

Downloads

Published

21-04-2024

How to Cite

Sachan, S., Saini , B. L., & Bhaladhare, A. (2024). Use of Modern Genetic Approaches in Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources (FAnGR): A Review. International Journal of Livestock Research, 11(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20201018071309

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.