Comparative Performance of Different Varieties of Chicken in Eastern Hill and Plateau Region of India

Authors

  • Bal Krishna Jha ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi, Plandu-834010, Jharkhand, INDIA
  • Asit Chakrabarti ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi, Plandu-834010, Jharkhand, INDIA
  • Virendra Kumar Yadav ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi, Plandu-834010, Jharkhand, INDIA
  • Pradip Kumar Sarkar ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi, Plandu-834010, Jharkhand, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20200824025442%20%20%20%20

Keywords:

Different Chicken Varieties, Eastern Hill and Plateau Region, India, Performance

Abstract

A comparative performance of different varieties of chicken namely Divyan Red, Vanaraja, Kaveri and Kadaknath was conducted during 2018-19 to find out an economical variety for rearing of poultry in Eastern Hill and Plateau Region of India. Chickens were randomly distributed into 4 groups of 100 each. The birds were reared under uniform and standard managemental practices. The study was conducted for 16 months (480 days) till the egg laying was ceased by the chickens. Various parameters were recorded at timed interval. The external and internal egg quality traits of different varieties were also determined. Significantly (P<0.05) higher egg weight (60.56 ± 0.83g), shape index (77.16 ± 0.56), egg shell weight (5.96 ± 0.07g), shell % (12.57 ± 0.51), albumen index (9.12 ±0.32 %), and yolk index (51.41 ± 0.43 %) was found in Divyan Red followed by Vanaraja, Kaveri and Kadaknath respectively. The highest number of egg production was recorded in Vanaraja (168.66 ±14.01) followed by Kaveri (159.77 ±13.88), Divyan Red (157.47 ±13.55) and least in Kadaknath (105.45 ±11.52) respectively. The body weight was found to be significantly (P<0.05) higher in Divyan Red (2194.21 ±21g) followed by Vanaraja (2168.56 ±53.16g), Kaveri (1936.29 ±50.12g) and Kadaknath (1605.24 ±49.21g). Total weight gains (g) were significantly (P<0.05) higher in Divyan Red (1926.64 ± 53.73) and least in Kadaknath (1424.34 ±47.21). Similarly, significantly (P<0.05) higher average daily weight gain (g/bird) was also recorded in Divyan Red (8.03 ± 0.17) and least in Kadaknath (5.94 ± 0.10). The total feed intake (kg/bird) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in Divyan Red and Vanaraja as comared to other two varieties of chicken. However, the FCR values were significantly (P<0.05) better in Divyan Red and Vanaraja than the Kaveri and Kadaknath. It was concluded that the chicken varieties Vanaraja, Divyan Red and Kaveri were equally better in respect of egg production and age at first egg in Eastern Hill and Plateau Region of India.

References

Alabi, R.A., Esobhawan, A.O., & Aruna, M.B. (2006). Econometric determination of contribution of family poultry to women's income in Niger-delta, Nigeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7, 753- 760.

Anonymous. (2017). Annual Report. ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar, pp.66-67.

Besbes, B. (2009). Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under suboptimal village conditions. World's Poultry Science Journal, 65, 260-271.

Deka, P., Sarma, M., Parsha, J.N., Rupam, B., Jogadev, M. & Binapani, D. (2014). Production performance of Vanraja bird under Traditional system of rearing in Assam. International Journal of Livestock Research, 4(2), 81-85.

Gueye, E.F. (1998). Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World's Poultry Science Journal, 54, 73- 86.

Gupta, C. S., Kumar, A., Arya, R., Patel, M., Ghosh, A. K., & Palod, A. (2007). Evaluation of egg quality of crossbred chickens reared under backyard farming in tarai areas of Uttaranchal. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 41, 216 – 219.

Jensen, H.K., & Dolberg, F. (2002). The Bangladesh Model and other experiences in Family Poultry Development. A conceptual framework for using poultry as a tool in poverty alleviation. INFPD E Conferences. International Network for Family Poultry Development. (http://www.fao.org/ag/AGAInfo/ subjects/en/infpd/econf_bang.html).

Jha, B.K. & Chakrabarti, A. (2017). Backyard poultry farming as a source of livelihood in Tribal village- An Economic Appraisal. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7(1), 267-274.

Mathivanan, R. & Selvaraj, P. (2003). Influence of dietary chromium on egg production and quality parameters in layers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 38, 51-53.

Musharaf, M. (1990). Rural poultry production in Sudan. Proceedings of International workshop on Rural Poultry Development in Africa, Ife-Ife, 160 –165.

Niranjan, M., Sharma, R.P., RajKumar, U., Chatterjee, R.N., Reddy, B.L.& Bhattacharya, T.K. (2008). Egg quality traits in chicken varieties developed for back yard poultry farming in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20 (12).

Padhi, M.K., Rai, R.B., Senani, S. & Saha, S.K. (1998). Assessment of egg quality in different breeds of chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 33, 113-115.

Sakunthaladevi, K. & Reddy, P.M. (2004). Effect of strain on physical egg quality characteristics in White Leghorn layers; Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 39, 190-192.

Singh, V., Gupta, R.K., Singh, M. & Gurung, B.S. (2000). Reproduction and production performance of Aseel an indigenous breed of chicken; Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 35, 200-204.

Singh, R.A. (1985). Poultry Production. 2nd edition. Kalyani Publishers, Daryaganj, New Delhi (India)-110002.

Sinha, B., Mandal, K. G., Kumari, R., Kumari, A. & Gonge, D. S. (2018). Genetic impact on external and internal egg quality traits of Vanaraja and Gramapriya birds and their crosses in Bihar. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52, 953-958.

Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.C. (1989). Statistical methods. 8th edition. Iowa state University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Subramanian, K.S., Rajavelu, D. & Narahari, D. (2001). Studies on the nesting behaviour and egg characteristics of free ranging peahen (Pavo cristatus). Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 43, 284-286.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2021

How to Cite

Jha, B. K., Chakrabarti, A., Yadav , V. K., & Sarkar, P. K. (2021). Comparative Performance of Different Varieties of Chicken in Eastern Hill and Plateau Region of India. International Journal of Livestock Research, 11(1), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20200824025442

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.