Consumer Preferences and Marketing of Ready-To-Eat Meat Products in Thrissur City of Kerala

Authors

  • John Abraham Associate Professor, Department of Livestock Production and Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, INDIA
  • Senthil Kumar R. Associate Professor, Department of Animal Husbandry Extension, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20210607080358%20%20%20%20%20%20%20

Keywords:

Brand Attributes, Market Mix, Meat and Meat Products, Ready-to-eat Meat Products

Abstract

A study was carried out in Thrissur city of Kerala state to analyse the market potential and consumers preferred attributes towards ready-to-eat meat products, so as to formulate an effective marketing mix. A well-structured questionnaire consisting of 21 questions was applied among 112 randomly selected respondents and their responses were recorded. The study on consumer preferences was based on 17 product attributes and 12 brand attributes. The significant product attribute and brand attributes were found to be almost similar. A correlation study was performed to elucidate the relationship between the consumption of meat and meat products and the respondent’s attributes such as age, gender, income and education. A functional analysis disclosed a statistically significant relationship between the consumption of meat and meat products and the respondent’s age, gender, income and education. The analysis on the perception of respondents about ready-to- eat meat products revealed huge market potential owing to rising income and changing lifestyle. But effective market permeation has to be achieved through appropriate marketing mix of products and brand attributes. Consumer awareness and sales promotion through mass media has to be taken up on a large scale to carve a niche for ready-to-eat meat products among the consumers.

References

Alvarez, T. O. and Caielles, M. E. (2008). Consumer behaviour and product performance: An alternative conceptualisation. Journal of Marketing (October 2008). 86-91.

Britt, J. H. (2009). Organoleptic properties influencing the preference of meat products. Meat Science 63: 1288-1296.

Deodhar, S. Y. and Vijay, I. (2001). Quality attributes of meat and meat products. IIM-A Working Paper: 2001-09. 453-457.

DGCIS. (2020). Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics. DOI: https://doi.org/dgciskol.gov.in

Garret H.E. (2005). Garrett’s ranking method in Statistics in psychology and education. Paragon International Publisher. 491p.

Hazral, P. and Sirohi, S. (2009). Emergence of Value-Added Meat Products in Indian Export Basket., National Seminar on Value Added Meat Products December 21-22 2009, NDRI, Karnal. Pp192-201.

Jaganmohan, N. (2020). Consumption volume of poultry meat in India from 2013 to 2019. DOI: http://www.statista.com/statistics/826711/india-poultry-meat consumption.

Philip, K and Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management, 15th ed. Pearson Education India. 899p.DOI: https://toc.library.ethz.ch/objects/pdf03/e01_978-1-292-09314-7_01.pdf

Samsinar, M., Sidin, D., Abdul Rahman, M. K.., Zabid, M. D., Abdul Rashid, and Abubakar, A. Z. (2008). Effect of social variables on urban children’s consumption attitude and behaviour intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing. Vol-25. Issue-1 Pp 7-15. DOI:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/07363760810845363/full/html

Vyas, B. M. (2005). Add Value or perish: Experience of Varsha Fresh meats. National seminar on value addition in meat. December 21-25, NRC on Meat Hyderabad.189-193

Downloads

Published

30-09-2021

How to Cite

Abraham, J., & R., S. K. (2021). Consumer Preferences and Marketing of Ready-To-Eat Meat Products in Thrissur City of Kerala. International Journal of Livestock Research, 11(9), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20210607080358

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.