NAAS Score – 4.31

Free counters!


Previous Next

Effect of Sex Separate Rearing on Uniformity of Commercial Broiler Chicken Reared in Deep Litter System

Sanghamitra Kalita Kula Prasad Kalita Niranjan Kalita Joga Dev Mahanta Hassan Farooque Ahmed Rafiqul Islam
Vol 8(1), 79-83

A total of 180 numbers of broiler chicks of 21 days of age were separated into male and female group on the basis of early appearance of comb in males. They were allotted to three treatment groups viz., T0 (mixed), T1 (male), and T2 (female)with 3 replicates of 20 chicks in each, reared up-to 42 days of age to evaluate the uniformity of body weight. At 4th week of age, highest uniformity was observed in T1 (male) group followed by both T0 (mixed) and T2 (female) group. At 5thand 6th week of age, highest uniformity was observed in T1 (male)group followed by T2 (female) and T0 (mixed). The study concluded that, the sex separated broilers showed the highest uniformity compared to the mixed flock.

Keywords : Broiler Chicken Deep Litter System Sex-Separate Rearing Uniformity


The poultry industry in India has shown remarkable progress in the last few decades, attaining the status of a full-fledged industry. Among them broiler farming is one of the promising and sustainable businesses in agricultural sector but one of the great economic problem of the broiler production is that all broilers are not the same weight at the market age. It is because broilers are being raised as straight run or mixed sex population. Because of difference in their sex, male and female broiler differs from each other in many aspects. Under similar management condition, compared to females the males grow faster, converts feed more efficiently, achieve marketable weight earlier than females, and have less carcass fat (Kalita and Sapcota, 2014). On comparison, males vary more than females within a given flock because the males are heavier. Females are usually small, medium and large in size, so also in males. Normally, the extremes are about 30 to 35 percent above and below the average weight of each sex. A flock can be called uniform, when approximately 75 % of each sex will be within 10% of the average weight of each sex for the flock (Kalita and Sapcota, 2014). Uniformity in the final body weight of the broilers as well as other economic advantages can be attained by growing flocks in single-sex population from day old age (Narahari and Kumararaj, 2008). The objective of the investigation was to evaluate the performance of the broilers and their uniformity at various weeks of age by raising each sex separately and compare them with the counterparts raised as mixed sex population.

Material and Methods

The experiment was conducted in the Instructional Poultry Farm, C.V.Sc, AAU, Khanapara, Assam (for 42 days) from the month of August to October 2015. A total numbers of 210 day-old commercial broiler chicks (Cobb-400 Y) having similar body weight from a single hatch was procured. Wing banding of the chicks were done on the1st day of arrival. The straight run commercial broiler chicks were reared from day-old to 21 days of age under standard managemental practices. Sex separation was done by observing the early appearance of comb in case of male birds. At 22 days of age, 180 birds were randomly allotted into three treatment groups viz., T0 (60 Straight run i.e. 30 males and 30 females), T1 (60 males) and T2 (60 females). Each group was divided into 3 replicates with 20 chicks each. The weight of individual bird was recorded at the start of the trial and then weekly interval up-to 6th week in the morning hour before offering any feed and water with the help of standard weighing scale. From these records, average weekly and final body weights of individual birds under each and every treatment groups were calculated. Uniformity of the body weight of broilers of different treatment groups was calculated on the basis of number of broiler within 10% above and below the mean body weight of the group. According to Narahari and Kumarraj (2008) a flock is termedas having body weight uniformity if 75% of the broilers of the flock are within 10%above and below of the mean body weight.

Data were analyzed by using standard statistical method.

Result and Discussion

The male broilers had significantly (P≤0.05) higher body weights in all the weeks of experiment compared to female (T2) and straight run (T0) groups. Table 1 recorded significantly (P≤0.05) higher mean body weight than the female (T2) group in 4th, 5th and 6th week of experiments. This could be due to the presence of only male bird in T1 group and 50% male inT0 group. This is indicative of an advantage by rearing broilers sex-separated after the end of brooding period. The female group of broiler could not grow fast as compared to the other two groups. This could be due to their genetic make-up. The male broilers usually grow faster compared to female probably because of their genetic capability (Kalita and Sapcota, 2014).

Table 1: (Mean ±SE) weekly body weight (g/bird) of broilers under different treatment groups









3rd week 855.00b ±9.04 943.16a ±7.17 861.33b ±6.73
4th week 1355.67b ±18.13 1460.17a ±11.05 1310.33c ±11.67
5th week 2087.50b ± 33.81 2254.67a ±28.13 1945.17c ±23.49
6th week 2322.11b ± 33.38 2509.17a ±22.24 2226.67c ±19.64

Means bearing different superscripts within a row differ significantly (P≤0.05)

Table 2: Anova for weekly body weight (g/bird) of broilers under different treatment groups

Weeks Sources Variation df SS MS F value
3rd week Treatment 2 290203.33 145101.66 40.61*
Error 177 632441.66 3573.11
4th week Treatment 2 708507.77 354253.88 30.16*
Error 177 2078965.00 11745.56
5th  week Treatment 2 2879874.44 1439937.22 28.95*
Error 177 8803316.67 49736.25
6th week Treatment 2 2475289.21 1237644.60 32.26*
Error 174 6676089.03 38368.32

* P≤0 .05 significant

Significantly heavier average body weight in male broilers compared to their female counterparts was also reported by Veerapen and Driver (1999), Narahari and Kumararaj (2008), Ojedapo et al. (2008), Lopez et al. (2011), Amponsah et al. (2012), Hernawan et al.(2012), Sogunle et al.(2013) and Kalita and Sapcota (2014), Beg et al. (2016). Similarly, Narahari and Kumararaj (2008) also reported that male chicks are not only capable of growing at a faster rate, but also grow well for a longer period. According to them, the growing of female broiler is slower beyond seven week of age. The uniformity of broilers at the end of 4th week of age was found to be almost similar being 90% in both T0 and T2 group and 91.6% T1 group (Table 3).

Table 3: Uniformity percentage (%) of the broilers under different treatment groups









4th week 90% 91.6% 90%
5th week 48.33% 78.33% 76.67%
6th week 70.17% 90% 80%

The similar kind of percentage (%) uniformity without much or no difference observed in all the three groups could be due to lower range of weight at 4th week of age. However, with comparatively higher rate of growth during the 5th week of age, the uniformity percentage (%) came down drastically in all the 3 groups at the end of 5th week. At 5th week of age, the highest percentage (%) of uniformity was observed in T1 (male) group (78.33%) followed by T2 (76.67%) and T0 group (48.33%) respectively. The lowest uniformity observed in T0 group at 5th and 6th week of age could be due to presence of both the sexes in the mixed-sex group, where the female birds grew comparatively slower than their male counterparts results lesser uniformity in the group. However, at the time of marketing both the sex separated groups had the highest average uniformity being 90% in T1 group and 80 % T2 group. As both the groups comprised of single sex population, these might be lesser competition for feeder space or peckorder resulting in the uniformity of body weights in both the groups (Kalita and Sapcota, 2014). Lower uniformity percentage is observed in T0 group (70.17%) was probably due to the presence of both sexes in this group, resulting competition for feeder space and peck order among the large, medium and small birds. This resulted in lower uniformity in T0 group. Less uniform final body weight at the time of marketing in mixed population could also be due to inadequate nutrient intake and lack of adequate feeder space without competition was reported by Singh and Nagra (2006). According to them, better uniformity observed in the sex separated group at the time of marketing could be due to rearing each sex separated flocks, which helps to reduce feed competition between large, medium and small sized birds. They further reported above 90% uniformity in male broiler and 85% uniformity in female broiler. Result of the study indicated that sex-separated rearing of commercial broiler is useful for uniform body weight at the time of marketing.Better uniformity is owed by maintenance of sex separated rearing was also reported by Toudic (2006), Narahari and Kumararaj (2008) and Kalita and Sapcota (2014).


At all the weeks of age, highly significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in body weight among the three experimental groups. The T1 (male) groups showed the highest body weight at of 1460.17 ± 11.05, 2254.67 ± 28.13 and 2509.17 ± 22.24 g for 4th, 5th, and 6th week respectively followed by T0 (mixed-sex) and T2 (female) group. At the age of 4th week under three different treatment groups, the highest uniformity, was found in T1 (male) (91.6 %) and lowest uniformity found in both T0 (mixed-sex) and T2 (female) groups (90%). During 5th and 6th week of age the highest uniformity was found in T1 (male) (78.33 % and 90 %) followed by T2 (female) (80 % and 76.67 %) and T0 (mixed-sex) (48.33% and 70.17%).


  1. Amponsah RO, Boniface BK and Naazie A. 2012. Age, genotype and sex effects on growth performance of local chickens kept under improved, management in Ghana. Tropical Animal Health Production, 44:29-34
  2. 2013. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi. Annual Report, 2012-2013.
  3. Azahan EA, Engku Marini AM and Noraziah M .2007. Evaluation on the effects of sex on growth and carcass characteristics of broiler. Journal of Tropical Agricultural and Food Science, 35(2):313-318
  4. Beg MAH, Saiful IKBM, Aftabuzzamam M and Mahbub ASM. 2016. Effects of separate sex growing on performance and metabolic disorders of broilers. International Journal of Animal Resources,1(1):19-26.
  5. Bogosavljevic BS, Kurcubic V, PetrovicM.D and RadovicV. 2006. The effect of sex and rearing system on carcass composition and cut yields of broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci., 51(1): 31-38.
  6. Burke WH and Sharp PJ. 1989. Sex differences in body weight of chicken embryos. Poultry Science.68:805-810.
  7. Kalita KP and Sapcota D. 2014. Sex Separate Rearing of Broiler Chickens. Poultry Punch.61-62.
  8. Khan AG, Poulouse MV and Chakraborti S. 1975. Sexual dimorpholism in the weight of chicks. British Poult. Sci., 16: 637-639.
  9. LamoreuxWF and Proudfoot FG. 1969. Effects on body weight and feed conversion of broiler chickens from three commercial crosses reared with the sexes separate or intermingled. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 49(1):23-28.
  10. Lang BJ, WM Collins, DH Palmar and WC Skoglund. 1960. Relationship of sex separation to individual variation in body weight and to experimental error. Poultry Science, 39:1578-1579.
  11. Laseinde EAO and Oluyemi JA. 1994. Effect of sex separation at the finisher phase on the comparative growth performance, carcass characteristics and breast muscle development between male and female broiler chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal production, 21:11-18
  12. Leenstra F and Cahaner, A. 1992. Effect of low, normal and high temperatures on slaughter yield of broilers from lines selected for high weight gain, favorable feed conversion and high or low fat content. Poultry Science. 71(12).
  13. Narahari D and Kumararaj R. 2008. Hand book of Applied Broiler Production. 1st , Poultry Punch Publication, New Delhi.
  14. Singh PM and Nagra SS 2006.Effect of day old chick weight and gender on the performance of commercial broiler. The Indian J. Anim. Sci., l 76 (12).
  15. Toudic C. 2006. Evaluating Uniformity in Broiler-factors affecting variation. The
Full Text Read : 3364 Downloads : 599
Previous Next

Open Access Policy